Cargando…
Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) programme ‘Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence' (SCORE) aims to generate confidence scores for a large number of research claims from empirical studies in the social and behavioural sciences. The confidence scores will pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200566 |
_version_ | 1783571032307662848 |
---|---|
author | Gordon, Michael Viganola, Domenico Bishop, Michael Chen, Yiling Dreber, Anna Goldfedder, Brandon Holzmeister, Felix Johannesson, Magnus Liu, Yang Twardy, Charles Wang, Juntao Pfeiffer, Thomas |
author_facet | Gordon, Michael Viganola, Domenico Bishop, Michael Chen, Yiling Dreber, Anna Goldfedder, Brandon Holzmeister, Felix Johannesson, Magnus Liu, Yang Twardy, Charles Wang, Juntao Pfeiffer, Thomas |
author_sort | Gordon, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) programme ‘Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence' (SCORE) aims to generate confidence scores for a large number of research claims from empirical studies in the social and behavioural sciences. The confidence scores will provide a quantitative assessment of how likely a claim will hold up in an independent replication. To create the scores, we follow earlier approaches and use prediction markets and surveys to forecast replication outcomes. Based on an initial set of forecasts for the overall replication rate in SCORE and its dependence on the academic discipline and the time of publication, we show that participants expect replication rates to increase over time. Moreover, they expect replication rates to differ between fields, with the highest replication rate in economics (average survey response 58%), and the lowest in psychology and in education (average survey response of 42% for both fields). These results reveal insights into the academic community's views of the replication crisis, including for research fields for which no large-scale replication studies have been undertaken yet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7428244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74282442020-08-31 Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme Gordon, Michael Viganola, Domenico Bishop, Michael Chen, Yiling Dreber, Anna Goldfedder, Brandon Holzmeister, Felix Johannesson, Magnus Liu, Yang Twardy, Charles Wang, Juntao Pfeiffer, Thomas R Soc Open Sci Mathematics The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) programme ‘Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence' (SCORE) aims to generate confidence scores for a large number of research claims from empirical studies in the social and behavioural sciences. The confidence scores will provide a quantitative assessment of how likely a claim will hold up in an independent replication. To create the scores, we follow earlier approaches and use prediction markets and surveys to forecast replication outcomes. Based on an initial set of forecasts for the overall replication rate in SCORE and its dependence on the academic discipline and the time of publication, we show that participants expect replication rates to increase over time. Moreover, they expect replication rates to differ between fields, with the highest replication rate in economics (average survey response 58%), and the lowest in psychology and in education (average survey response of 42% for both fields). These results reveal insights into the academic community's views of the replication crisis, including for research fields for which no large-scale replication studies have been undertaken yet. The Royal Society 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7428244/ /pubmed/32874648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200566 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Mathematics Gordon, Michael Viganola, Domenico Bishop, Michael Chen, Yiling Dreber, Anna Goldfedder, Brandon Holzmeister, Felix Johannesson, Magnus Liu, Yang Twardy, Charles Wang, Juntao Pfeiffer, Thomas Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
title | Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
title_full | Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
title_fullStr | Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
title_short | Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme |
title_sort | are replication rates the same across academic fields? community forecasts from the darpa score programme |
topic | Mathematics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gordonmichael arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT viganoladomenico arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT bishopmichael arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT chenyiling arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT dreberanna arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT goldfedderbrandon arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT holzmeisterfelix arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT johannessonmagnus arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT liuyang arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT twardycharles arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT wangjuntao arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme AT pfeifferthomas arereplicationratesthesameacrossacademicfieldscommunityforecastsfromthedarpascoreprogramme |