Cargando…

Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that variant repeat interruptions (RIs) within the DMPK CTG repeat tract lead to milder symptoms compared with pure repeats (PRs) in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS: We evaluated motor, neurocognitive, and behavioral outcomes in a group of 6 participants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Jacob N., van der Plas, Ellen, Hamilton, Mark, Koscik, Timothy R., Gutmann, Laurie, Cumming, Sarah A., Monckton, Darren G., Nopoulos, Peggy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32851192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000504
_version_ 1783571058560860160
author Miller, Jacob N.
van der Plas, Ellen
Hamilton, Mark
Koscik, Timothy R.
Gutmann, Laurie
Cumming, Sarah A.
Monckton, Darren G.
Nopoulos, Peggy C.
author_facet Miller, Jacob N.
van der Plas, Ellen
Hamilton, Mark
Koscik, Timothy R.
Gutmann, Laurie
Cumming, Sarah A.
Monckton, Darren G.
Nopoulos, Peggy C.
author_sort Miller, Jacob N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that variant repeat interruptions (RIs) within the DMPK CTG repeat tract lead to milder symptoms compared with pure repeats (PRs) in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS: We evaluated motor, neurocognitive, and behavioral outcomes in a group of 6 participants with DM1 with RI compared with a case-matched sample of 12 participants with DM1 with PR and a case-matched sample of 12 unaffected healthy comparison participants (UA). RESULTS: In every measure, the RI participants were intermediate between UA and PR participants. For muscle strength, the RI group was significantly less impaired than the PR group. For measures of Full Scale IQ, depression, and sleepiness, all 3 groups were significantly different from each other with UA > RI > PR in order of impairment. The RI group was different from unaffected, but not significantly different from PR (UA > RI = PR) in apathy and working memory. Finally, in finger tapping and processing speed, RI did not differ from UA comparisons, but PR had significantly lower scores than the UA comparisons (UA = RI > PR). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that patients affected by DM1 with RI demonstrate a milder phenotype with the same pattern of deficits as those with PR indicating a similar disease process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7428360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74283602020-08-25 Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1 Miller, Jacob N. van der Plas, Ellen Hamilton, Mark Koscik, Timothy R. Gutmann, Laurie Cumming, Sarah A. Monckton, Darren G. Nopoulos, Peggy C. Neurol Genet Article OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that variant repeat interruptions (RIs) within the DMPK CTG repeat tract lead to milder symptoms compared with pure repeats (PRs) in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS: We evaluated motor, neurocognitive, and behavioral outcomes in a group of 6 participants with DM1 with RI compared with a case-matched sample of 12 participants with DM1 with PR and a case-matched sample of 12 unaffected healthy comparison participants (UA). RESULTS: In every measure, the RI participants were intermediate between UA and PR participants. For muscle strength, the RI group was significantly less impaired than the PR group. For measures of Full Scale IQ, depression, and sleepiness, all 3 groups were significantly different from each other with UA > RI > PR in order of impairment. The RI group was different from unaffected, but not significantly different from PR (UA > RI = PR) in apathy and working memory. Finally, in finger tapping and processing speed, RI did not differ from UA comparisons, but PR had significantly lower scores than the UA comparisons (UA = RI > PR). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that patients affected by DM1 with RI demonstrate a milder phenotype with the same pattern of deficits as those with PR indicating a similar disease process. Wolters Kluwer 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7428360/ /pubmed/32851192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000504 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Miller, Jacob N.
van der Plas, Ellen
Hamilton, Mark
Koscik, Timothy R.
Gutmann, Laurie
Cumming, Sarah A.
Monckton, Darren G.
Nopoulos, Peggy C.
Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
title Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_full Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_fullStr Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_full_unstemmed Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_short Variant repeats within the DMPK CTG expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
title_sort variant repeats within the dmpk ctg expansion protect function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32851192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000000504
work_keys_str_mv AT millerjacobn variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT vanderplasellen variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT hamiltonmark variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT kosciktimothyr variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT gutmannlaurie variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT cummingsaraha variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT moncktondarreng variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1
AT nopoulospeggyc variantrepeatswithinthedmpkctgexpansionprotectfunctioninmyotonicdystrophytype1