Cargando…
Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
BACKGROUND: Significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is associated with higher risk of strokes. While the prevalence of moderate and severe ACS is low in the general population, prediction models may allow identification of individuals at increased risk, thereby enabling targeted screening. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014766 |
_version_ | 1783571090084200448 |
---|---|
author | Poorthuis, Michiel H. F. Halliday, Alison Massa, M. Sofia Sherliker, Paul Clack, Rachel Morris, Dylan R. Clarke, Robert de Borst, Gert J. Bulbulia, Richard Lewington, Sarah |
author_facet | Poorthuis, Michiel H. F. Halliday, Alison Massa, M. Sofia Sherliker, Paul Clack, Rachel Morris, Dylan R. Clarke, Robert de Borst, Gert J. Bulbulia, Richard Lewington, Sarah |
author_sort | Poorthuis, Michiel H. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is associated with higher risk of strokes. While the prevalence of moderate and severe ACS is low in the general population, prediction models may allow identification of individuals at increased risk, thereby enabling targeted screening. We identified established prediction models for ACS and externally validated them in a large screening population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prediction models for prevalent cases with ≥50% ACS were identified in a systematic review (975 studies reviewed and 6 prediction models identified [3 for moderate and 3 for severe ACS]) and then validated using data from 596 469 individuals who attended commercial vascular screening clinics in the United States and United Kingdom. We assessed discrimination and calibration. In the validation cohort, 11 178 (1.87%) participants had ≥50% ACS and 2033 (0.34%) had ≥70% ACS. The best model included age, sex, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, vascular and cerebrovascular disease, measured blood pressure, and blood lipids. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.75) for ≥50% ACS and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77–0.79) for ≥70% ACS. The prevalence of ≥50% ACS in the highest decile of risk was 6.51%, and 1.42% for ≥70% ACS. Targeted screening of the 10% highest risk identified 35% of cases with ≥50% ACS and 42% of cases with ≥70% ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at high risk of significant ACS can be selected reliably using a prediction model. The best‐performing prediction models identified over one third of all cases by targeted screening of individuals in the highest decile of risk only. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7428515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74285152020-08-17 Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Poorthuis, Michiel H. F. Halliday, Alison Massa, M. Sofia Sherliker, Paul Clack, Rachel Morris, Dylan R. Clarke, Robert de Borst, Gert J. Bulbulia, Richard Lewington, Sarah J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is associated with higher risk of strokes. While the prevalence of moderate and severe ACS is low in the general population, prediction models may allow identification of individuals at increased risk, thereby enabling targeted screening. We identified established prediction models for ACS and externally validated them in a large screening population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prediction models for prevalent cases with ≥50% ACS were identified in a systematic review (975 studies reviewed and 6 prediction models identified [3 for moderate and 3 for severe ACS]) and then validated using data from 596 469 individuals who attended commercial vascular screening clinics in the United States and United Kingdom. We assessed discrimination and calibration. In the validation cohort, 11 178 (1.87%) participants had ≥50% ACS and 2033 (0.34%) had ≥70% ACS. The best model included age, sex, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, vascular and cerebrovascular disease, measured blood pressure, and blood lipids. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.75) for ≥50% ACS and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77–0.79) for ≥70% ACS. The prevalence of ≥50% ACS in the highest decile of risk was 6.51%, and 1.42% for ≥70% ACS. Targeted screening of the 10% highest risk identified 35% of cases with ≥50% ACS and 42% of cases with ≥70% ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at high risk of significant ACS can be selected reliably using a prediction model. The best‐performing prediction models identified over one third of all cases by targeted screening of individuals in the highest decile of risk only. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7428515/ /pubmed/32310014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014766 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Poorthuis, Michiel H. F. Halliday, Alison Massa, M. Sofia Sherliker, Paul Clack, Rachel Morris, Dylan R. Clarke, Robert de Borst, Gert J. Bulbulia, Richard Lewington, Sarah Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis |
title | Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis |
title_full | Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis |
title_fullStr | Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis |
title_short | Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis |
title_sort | validation of risk prediction models to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poorthuismichielhf validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT hallidayalison validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT massamsofia validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT sherlikerpaul validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT clackrachel validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT morrisdylanr validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT clarkerobert validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT deborstgertj validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT bulbuliarichard validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT lewingtonsarah validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis |