Cargando…

Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

BACKGROUND: Significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is associated with higher risk of strokes. While the prevalence of moderate and severe ACS is low in the general population, prediction models may allow identification of individuals at increased risk, thereby enabling targeted screening. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poorthuis, Michiel H. F., Halliday, Alison, Massa, M. Sofia, Sherliker, Paul, Clack, Rachel, Morris, Dylan R., Clarke, Robert, de Borst, Gert J., Bulbulia, Richard, Lewington, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014766
_version_ 1783571090084200448
author Poorthuis, Michiel H. F.
Halliday, Alison
Massa, M. Sofia
Sherliker, Paul
Clack, Rachel
Morris, Dylan R.
Clarke, Robert
de Borst, Gert J.
Bulbulia, Richard
Lewington, Sarah
author_facet Poorthuis, Michiel H. F.
Halliday, Alison
Massa, M. Sofia
Sherliker, Paul
Clack, Rachel
Morris, Dylan R.
Clarke, Robert
de Borst, Gert J.
Bulbulia, Richard
Lewington, Sarah
author_sort Poorthuis, Michiel H. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is associated with higher risk of strokes. While the prevalence of moderate and severe ACS is low in the general population, prediction models may allow identification of individuals at increased risk, thereby enabling targeted screening. We identified established prediction models for ACS and externally validated them in a large screening population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prediction models for prevalent cases with ≥50% ACS were identified in a systematic review (975 studies reviewed and 6 prediction models identified [3 for moderate and 3 for severe ACS]) and then validated using data from 596 469 individuals who attended commercial vascular screening clinics in the United States and United Kingdom. We assessed discrimination and calibration. In the validation cohort, 11 178 (1.87%) participants had ≥50% ACS and 2033 (0.34%) had ≥70% ACS. The best model included age, sex, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, vascular and cerebrovascular disease, measured blood pressure, and blood lipids. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.75) for ≥50% ACS and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77–0.79) for ≥70% ACS. The prevalence of ≥50% ACS in the highest decile of risk was 6.51%, and 1.42% for ≥70% ACS. Targeted screening of the 10% highest risk identified 35% of cases with ≥50% ACS and 42% of cases with ≥70% ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at high risk of significant ACS can be selected reliably using a prediction model. The best‐performing prediction models identified over one third of all cases by targeted screening of individuals in the highest decile of risk only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7428515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74285152020-08-17 Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Poorthuis, Michiel H. F. Halliday, Alison Massa, M. Sofia Sherliker, Paul Clack, Rachel Morris, Dylan R. Clarke, Robert de Borst, Gert J. Bulbulia, Richard Lewington, Sarah J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is associated with higher risk of strokes. While the prevalence of moderate and severe ACS is low in the general population, prediction models may allow identification of individuals at increased risk, thereby enabling targeted screening. We identified established prediction models for ACS and externally validated them in a large screening population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prediction models for prevalent cases with ≥50% ACS were identified in a systematic review (975 studies reviewed and 6 prediction models identified [3 for moderate and 3 for severe ACS]) and then validated using data from 596 469 individuals who attended commercial vascular screening clinics in the United States and United Kingdom. We assessed discrimination and calibration. In the validation cohort, 11 178 (1.87%) participants had ≥50% ACS and 2033 (0.34%) had ≥70% ACS. The best model included age, sex, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, vascular and cerebrovascular disease, measured blood pressure, and blood lipids. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.75) for ≥50% ACS and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77–0.79) for ≥70% ACS. The prevalence of ≥50% ACS in the highest decile of risk was 6.51%, and 1.42% for ≥70% ACS. Targeted screening of the 10% highest risk identified 35% of cases with ≥50% ACS and 42% of cases with ≥70% ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at high risk of significant ACS can be selected reliably using a prediction model. The best‐performing prediction models identified over one third of all cases by targeted screening of individuals in the highest decile of risk only. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7428515/ /pubmed/32310014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014766 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Poorthuis, Michiel H. F.
Halliday, Alison
Massa, M. Sofia
Sherliker, Paul
Clack, Rachel
Morris, Dylan R.
Clarke, Robert
de Borst, Gert J.
Bulbulia, Richard
Lewington, Sarah
Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_full Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_fullStr Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_short Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
title_sort validation of risk prediction models to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014766
work_keys_str_mv AT poorthuismichielhf validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT hallidayalison validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT massamsofia validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT sherlikerpaul validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT clackrachel validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT morrisdylanr validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT clarkerobert validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT deborstgertj validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT bulbuliarichard validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis
AT lewingtonsarah validationofriskpredictionmodelstodetectasymptomaticcarotidstenosis