Cargando…
Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
BACKGROUND: Concurrent presence of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is termed mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD). Although multiple articles have addressed patients with “isolated” aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation, the natural history, impact, and outcomes of MAVD are not well defined....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014591 |
_version_ | 1783571119949742080 |
---|---|
author | Isaza, Nicolas Desai, Milind Y. Kapadia, Samir R. Krishnaswamy, Amar Rodriguez, L. Leonardo Grimm, Richard A. Conic, Julijana Z. Saijo, Yoshihito Roselli, Eric E. Gillinov, A. Marc Johnston, Douglas R. Svensson, Lars G. Griffin, Brian P. Popović, Zoran B. |
author_facet | Isaza, Nicolas Desai, Milind Y. Kapadia, Samir R. Krishnaswamy, Amar Rodriguez, L. Leonardo Grimm, Richard A. Conic, Julijana Z. Saijo, Yoshihito Roselli, Eric E. Gillinov, A. Marc Johnston, Douglas R. Svensson, Lars G. Griffin, Brian P. Popović, Zoran B. |
author_sort | Isaza, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concurrent presence of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is termed mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD). Although multiple articles have addressed patients with “isolated” aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation, the natural history, impact, and outcomes of MAVD are not well defined. Here, we evaluate long‐term outcomes in patients with MAVD and cardiovascular adaptations to chronic MAVD. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational cohort study evaluated 862 adult patients (56.8% male) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and at least moderate aortic regurgitation and moderate aortic stenosis. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was based on treatment modality (aortic valve replacement [AVR] versus medical management). A regression analysis of longitudinal echocardiographic parameters was performed to assess the natural history of MAVD. Mean age was 68±15 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±5%. At 4.6 years (25th–75th percentile range, 1.0–8.7), 58.6% of patients underwent an AVR and 48.8% patients died. In both unadjusted and adjusted Cox survival analysis, AVR was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.34–0.51, P<0.001). Impact of AVR persisted when stratifying the cohort by symptom status and baseline aortic valve area (log rank, P<0.001 for both) and after propensity‐score matching (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32–0.50; P<0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, there were statistically significant changes over time in aortic valve peak gradient (P<0.001) and aortic valve area (P<0.001) and only mild increases in left ventricular end‐diastolic (P<0.007) and ‐systolic (P<0.001) volumes. CONCLUSIONS: MAVD confers a high risk of all‐cause mortality. However, AVR significantly reduces this risk independent of aortic valve area, symptom status, and after controlling for confounding variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7428636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74286362020-08-17 Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Isaza, Nicolas Desai, Milind Y. Kapadia, Samir R. Krishnaswamy, Amar Rodriguez, L. Leonardo Grimm, Richard A. Conic, Julijana Z. Saijo, Yoshihito Roselli, Eric E. Gillinov, A. Marc Johnston, Douglas R. Svensson, Lars G. Griffin, Brian P. Popović, Zoran B. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Concurrent presence of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is termed mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD). Although multiple articles have addressed patients with “isolated” aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation, the natural history, impact, and outcomes of MAVD are not well defined. Here, we evaluate long‐term outcomes in patients with MAVD and cardiovascular adaptations to chronic MAVD. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational cohort study evaluated 862 adult patients (56.8% male) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and at least moderate aortic regurgitation and moderate aortic stenosis. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was based on treatment modality (aortic valve replacement [AVR] versus medical management). A regression analysis of longitudinal echocardiographic parameters was performed to assess the natural history of MAVD. Mean age was 68±15 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±5%. At 4.6 years (25th–75th percentile range, 1.0–8.7), 58.6% of patients underwent an AVR and 48.8% patients died. In both unadjusted and adjusted Cox survival analysis, AVR was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.34–0.51, P<0.001). Impact of AVR persisted when stratifying the cohort by symptom status and baseline aortic valve area (log rank, P<0.001 for both) and after propensity‐score matching (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32–0.50; P<0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, there were statistically significant changes over time in aortic valve peak gradient (P<0.001) and aortic valve area (P<0.001) and only mild increases in left ventricular end‐diastolic (P<0.007) and ‐systolic (P<0.001) volumes. CONCLUSIONS: MAVD confers a high risk of all‐cause mortality. However, AVR significantly reduces this risk independent of aortic valve area, symptom status, and after controlling for confounding variables. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7428636/ /pubmed/32204665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014591 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Isaza, Nicolas Desai, Milind Y. Kapadia, Samir R. Krishnaswamy, Amar Rodriguez, L. Leonardo Grimm, Richard A. Conic, Julijana Z. Saijo, Yoshihito Roselli, Eric E. Gillinov, A. Marc Johnston, Douglas R. Svensson, Lars G. Griffin, Brian P. Popović, Zoran B. Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction |
title | Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction |
title_full | Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction |
title_fullStr | Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction |
title_short | Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction |
title_sort | long‐term outcomes in patients with mixed aortic valve disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isazanicolas longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT desaimilindy longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT kapadiasamirr longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT krishnaswamyamar longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT rodriguezlleonardo longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT grimmricharda longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT conicjulijanaz longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT saijoyoshihito longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT rosellierice longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT gillinovamarc longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT johnstondouglasr longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT svenssonlarsg longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT griffinbrianp longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction AT popoviczoranb longtermoutcomesinpatientswithmixedaorticvalvediseaseandpreservedleftventricularejectionfraction |