Cargando…

Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed trials comparing different reperfusion strategies for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and used multivariate network meta‐analysis to compare outcomes across these strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 31 contemporary trials in which patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fazel, Reza, Joseph, Timothy I., Sankardas, Mullasari A., Pinto, Duane S., Yeh, Robert W., Kumbhani, Dharam J., Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015186
_version_ 1783571213866500096
author Fazel, Reza
Joseph, Timothy I.
Sankardas, Mullasari A.
Pinto, Duane S.
Yeh, Robert W.
Kumbhani, Dharam J.
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
author_facet Fazel, Reza
Joseph, Timothy I.
Sankardas, Mullasari A.
Pinto, Duane S.
Yeh, Robert W.
Kumbhani, Dharam J.
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
author_sort Fazel, Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed trials comparing different reperfusion strategies for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and used multivariate network meta‐analysis to compare outcomes across these strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 31 contemporary trials in which patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to ≥2 of the following strategies: fibrinolytic therapy (n=4212), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=6139), or fibrinolysis followed by routine early PCI (n=5006). We categorized the last approach as “facilitated PCI” when the median time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI was <2 hours (n=2259) and as a “pharmacoinvasive approach” when this interval was ≥2 hours (n=2747). We evaluated outcomes of death, nonfatal reinfarction, stroke, and major bleeding using a multivariate network meta‐analysis and a Bayesian analysis. Among the strategies evaluated, primary PCI was associated with the lowest risk of mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, and stroke. For mortality, primary PCI had an odds ratio of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61–0.89) when compared with fibrinolytic therapy. Of the remaining strategies, the pharmacoinvasive approach was the next most favorable with an odds ratio for death of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.59–1.08) compared with fibrinolytic therapy. The Bayesian model indicated that when the 2 strategies examining routine early invasive therapy following fibrinolysis were directly compared, the probability of adverse outcomes was lower for the pharmacoinvasive approach relative to facilitated PCI. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacoinvasive approach is safer and more effective than facilitated PCI and fibrinolytic therapy alone. This has significant implications for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction care in settings where timely access to primary PCI, the preferred treatment for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, is not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7429064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74290642020-08-18 Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis Fazel, Reza Joseph, Timothy I. Sankardas, Mullasari A. Pinto, Duane S. Yeh, Robert W. Kumbhani, Dharam J. Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed trials comparing different reperfusion strategies for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and used multivariate network meta‐analysis to compare outcomes across these strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 31 contemporary trials in which patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to ≥2 of the following strategies: fibrinolytic therapy (n=4212), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=6139), or fibrinolysis followed by routine early PCI (n=5006). We categorized the last approach as “facilitated PCI” when the median time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI was <2 hours (n=2259) and as a “pharmacoinvasive approach” when this interval was ≥2 hours (n=2747). We evaluated outcomes of death, nonfatal reinfarction, stroke, and major bleeding using a multivariate network meta‐analysis and a Bayesian analysis. Among the strategies evaluated, primary PCI was associated with the lowest risk of mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, and stroke. For mortality, primary PCI had an odds ratio of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61–0.89) when compared with fibrinolytic therapy. Of the remaining strategies, the pharmacoinvasive approach was the next most favorable with an odds ratio for death of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.59–1.08) compared with fibrinolytic therapy. The Bayesian model indicated that when the 2 strategies examining routine early invasive therapy following fibrinolysis were directly compared, the probability of adverse outcomes was lower for the pharmacoinvasive approach relative to facilitated PCI. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacoinvasive approach is safer and more effective than facilitated PCI and fibrinolytic therapy alone. This has significant implications for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction care in settings where timely access to primary PCI, the preferred treatment for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, is not available. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7429064/ /pubmed/32500800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015186 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Fazel, Reza
Joseph, Timothy I.
Sankardas, Mullasari A.
Pinto, Duane S.
Yeh, Robert W.
Kumbhani, Dharam J.
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis
title Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis
title_full Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis
title_short Comparison of Reperfusion Strategies for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multivariate Network Meta‐analysis
title_sort comparison of reperfusion strategies for st‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction: a multivariate network meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015186
work_keys_str_mv AT fazelreza comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis
AT josephtimothyi comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis
AT sankardasmullasaria comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis
AT pintoduanes comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis
AT yehrobertw comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis
AT kumbhanidharamj comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis
AT nallamothubrahmajeek comparisonofreperfusionstrategiesforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamultivariatenetworkmetaanalysis