Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of ICD placement in patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Abhinav, Wu, Jingjing, Xu, Haolin, Hernandez, Adrian, Felker, G. Michael, Al‐Khatib, Sana, Green, Jennifer, Matsouaka, Roland, Fonarow, Gregg C., Singh, Jagmeet P., Heidenreich, Paul A., Ezekowitz, Justin A., DeVore, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32476539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012405
_version_ 1783571214341505024
author Sharma, Abhinav
Wu, Jingjing
Xu, Haolin
Hernandez, Adrian
Felker, G. Michael
Al‐Khatib, Sana
Green, Jennifer
Matsouaka, Roland
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Heidenreich, Paul A.
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
DeVore, Adam
author_facet Sharma, Abhinav
Wu, Jingjing
Xu, Haolin
Hernandez, Adrian
Felker, G. Michael
Al‐Khatib, Sana
Green, Jennifer
Matsouaka, Roland
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Heidenreich, Paul A.
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
DeVore, Adam
author_sort Sharma, Abhinav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of ICD placement in patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Get With the Guidelines–Health Failure registry, linked with claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used a Cox proportional hazards model censored at 5 years with propensity score matching. Of the 17 186 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims database (6540 with diabetes mellitus; 38%), 1677 (646 with diabetes mellitus; 39%) received an ICD during their index HF hospitalization or were prescribed an ICD at discharge. Patients with diabetes mellitus and an ICD (n=646), as compared with those without an ICD (n=1031), were more likely to be younger (74 versus 78 years of age) and have coronary artery disease (68% versus 60%). After propensity matching, ICD use among patients with diabetes mellitus, as compared with those without an ICD, was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality at 5 years after HF discharge (54% versus 59%; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64–0.82; P<0.0001). Ischemic heart disease did not modify the association between ICD use and all‐cause mortality (P=0.95 for interaction). Similar results were seen in patients without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention ICD use among older patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction and diabetes mellitus was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality. Our analysis supports current guideline recommendations for implantation of primary prevention ICDs among older patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7429066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74290662020-08-18 Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Sharma, Abhinav Wu, Jingjing Xu, Haolin Hernandez, Adrian Felker, G. Michael Al‐Khatib, Sana Green, Jennifer Matsouaka, Roland Fonarow, Gregg C. Singh, Jagmeet P. Heidenreich, Paul A. Ezekowitz, Justin A. DeVore, Adam J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of ICD placement in patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Get With the Guidelines–Health Failure registry, linked with claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used a Cox proportional hazards model censored at 5 years with propensity score matching. Of the 17 186 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims database (6540 with diabetes mellitus; 38%), 1677 (646 with diabetes mellitus; 39%) received an ICD during their index HF hospitalization or were prescribed an ICD at discharge. Patients with diabetes mellitus and an ICD (n=646), as compared with those without an ICD (n=1031), were more likely to be younger (74 versus 78 years of age) and have coronary artery disease (68% versus 60%). After propensity matching, ICD use among patients with diabetes mellitus, as compared with those without an ICD, was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality at 5 years after HF discharge (54% versus 59%; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64–0.82; P<0.0001). Ischemic heart disease did not modify the association between ICD use and all‐cause mortality (P=0.95 for interaction). Similar results were seen in patients without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention ICD use among older patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction and diabetes mellitus was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality. Our analysis supports current guideline recommendations for implantation of primary prevention ICDs among older patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7429066/ /pubmed/32476539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012405 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sharma, Abhinav
Wu, Jingjing
Xu, Haolin
Hernandez, Adrian
Felker, G. Michael
Al‐Khatib, Sana
Green, Jennifer
Matsouaka, Roland
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Heidenreich, Paul A.
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
DeVore, Adam
Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
title Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort comparative effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators in older heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32476539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012405
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaabhinav comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT wujingjing comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT xuhaolin comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT hernandezadrian comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT felkergmichael comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT alkhatibsana comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT greenjennifer comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT matsouakaroland comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT fonarowgreggc comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT singhjagmeetp comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT heidenreichpaula comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT ezekowitzjustina comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus
AT devoreadam comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus