Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of ICD placement in patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32476539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012405 |
_version_ | 1783571214341505024 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Abhinav Wu, Jingjing Xu, Haolin Hernandez, Adrian Felker, G. Michael Al‐Khatib, Sana Green, Jennifer Matsouaka, Roland Fonarow, Gregg C. Singh, Jagmeet P. Heidenreich, Paul A. Ezekowitz, Justin A. DeVore, Adam |
author_facet | Sharma, Abhinav Wu, Jingjing Xu, Haolin Hernandez, Adrian Felker, G. Michael Al‐Khatib, Sana Green, Jennifer Matsouaka, Roland Fonarow, Gregg C. Singh, Jagmeet P. Heidenreich, Paul A. Ezekowitz, Justin A. DeVore, Adam |
author_sort | Sharma, Abhinav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of ICD placement in patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Get With the Guidelines–Health Failure registry, linked with claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used a Cox proportional hazards model censored at 5 years with propensity score matching. Of the 17 186 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims database (6540 with diabetes mellitus; 38%), 1677 (646 with diabetes mellitus; 39%) received an ICD during their index HF hospitalization or were prescribed an ICD at discharge. Patients with diabetes mellitus and an ICD (n=646), as compared with those without an ICD (n=1031), were more likely to be younger (74 versus 78 years of age) and have coronary artery disease (68% versus 60%). After propensity matching, ICD use among patients with diabetes mellitus, as compared with those without an ICD, was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality at 5 years after HF discharge (54% versus 59%; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64–0.82; P<0.0001). Ischemic heart disease did not modify the association between ICD use and all‐cause mortality (P=0.95 for interaction). Similar results were seen in patients without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention ICD use among older patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction and diabetes mellitus was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality. Our analysis supports current guideline recommendations for implantation of primary prevention ICDs among older patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7429066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74290662020-08-18 Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Sharma, Abhinav Wu, Jingjing Xu, Haolin Hernandez, Adrian Felker, G. Michael Al‐Khatib, Sana Green, Jennifer Matsouaka, Roland Fonarow, Gregg C. Singh, Jagmeet P. Heidenreich, Paul A. Ezekowitz, Justin A. DeVore, Adam J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of ICD placement in patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from the Get With the Guidelines–Health Failure registry, linked with claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used a Cox proportional hazards model censored at 5 years with propensity score matching. Of the 17 186 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims database (6540 with diabetes mellitus; 38%), 1677 (646 with diabetes mellitus; 39%) received an ICD during their index HF hospitalization or were prescribed an ICD at discharge. Patients with diabetes mellitus and an ICD (n=646), as compared with those without an ICD (n=1031), were more likely to be younger (74 versus 78 years of age) and have coronary artery disease (68% versus 60%). After propensity matching, ICD use among patients with diabetes mellitus, as compared with those without an ICD, was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality at 5 years after HF discharge (54% versus 59%; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64–0.82; P<0.0001). Ischemic heart disease did not modify the association between ICD use and all‐cause mortality (P=0.95 for interaction). Similar results were seen in patients without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention ICD use among older patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction and diabetes mellitus was associated with a reduced risk of all‐cause mortality. Our analysis supports current guideline recommendations for implantation of primary prevention ICDs among older patients with diabetes mellitus and HF with reduced ejection fraction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7429066/ /pubmed/32476539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012405 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sharma, Abhinav Wu, Jingjing Xu, Haolin Hernandez, Adrian Felker, G. Michael Al‐Khatib, Sana Green, Jennifer Matsouaka, Roland Fonarow, Gregg C. Singh, Jagmeet P. Heidenreich, Paul A. Ezekowitz, Justin A. DeVore, Adam Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Older Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Mellitus |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators in older heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32476539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaabhinav comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT wujingjing comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT xuhaolin comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT hernandezadrian comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT felkergmichael comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT alkhatibsana comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT greenjennifer comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT matsouakaroland comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT fonarowgreggc comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT singhjagmeetp comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT heidenreichpaula comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT ezekowitzjustina comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus AT devoreadam comparativeeffectivenessofprimarypreventionimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsinolderheartfailurepatientswithdiabetesmellitus |