Cargando…

Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management

Rhinophyma is an advanced stage of rosacea affecting the nasal soft tissues and resulting in disruption of the nasal architecture, airway obstruction, and disfigurement of the nasal aesthetic units. Rhinophyma presents with hypertrophy of the nasal soft tissues, erythema, telangiectasias, nodules, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chauhan, Ruvi, Loewenstein, Scott N, Hassanein, Aladdin H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848439
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S201290
_version_ 1783571223469359104
author Chauhan, Ruvi
Loewenstein, Scott N
Hassanein, Aladdin H
author_facet Chauhan, Ruvi
Loewenstein, Scott N
Hassanein, Aladdin H
author_sort Chauhan, Ruvi
collection PubMed
description Rhinophyma is an advanced stage of rosacea affecting the nasal soft tissues and resulting in disruption of the nasal architecture, airway obstruction, and disfigurement of the nasal aesthetic units. Rhinophyma presents with hypertrophy of the nasal soft tissues, erythema, telangiectasias, nodules, and lobules with a bulbous appearance. Significant psychosocial morbidity is associated with the disease. Understanding of this disease has improved and multiple treatment options exist. The article is a review of the literature to evaluate the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and epidemiology of keywords “rhinophyma” and “rosacea” using an OVID Medline and PubMed search along with a systematic review of outcomes pertaining to treatment of rhinophyma with laser therapy, scalpel excision, and the subunit method using an OVID Medline search. The subunit method has the highest complication and revision rates followed by carbon dioxide laser therapy. Outcomes between carbon dioxide laser and scalpel therapy and electrocautery are equivalent. Scalpel excision is a more cost-effective treatment modality with less post-operative complications; however, it risks poor hemostasis intraoperatively. Patient satisfaction is common post-therapy regardless of the treatment method. Over 89% of patients would recommend undergoing treatment for rhinophyma irrespective of treatment type. Treatment options vary, and choice of treatment can be dependent on practitioner and patients’ treatment goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7429105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74291052020-08-25 Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management Chauhan, Ruvi Loewenstein, Scott N Hassanein, Aladdin H Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Review Rhinophyma is an advanced stage of rosacea affecting the nasal soft tissues and resulting in disruption of the nasal architecture, airway obstruction, and disfigurement of the nasal aesthetic units. Rhinophyma presents with hypertrophy of the nasal soft tissues, erythema, telangiectasias, nodules, and lobules with a bulbous appearance. Significant psychosocial morbidity is associated with the disease. Understanding of this disease has improved and multiple treatment options exist. The article is a review of the literature to evaluate the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and epidemiology of keywords “rhinophyma” and “rosacea” using an OVID Medline and PubMed search along with a systematic review of outcomes pertaining to treatment of rhinophyma with laser therapy, scalpel excision, and the subunit method using an OVID Medline search. The subunit method has the highest complication and revision rates followed by carbon dioxide laser therapy. Outcomes between carbon dioxide laser and scalpel therapy and electrocautery are equivalent. Scalpel excision is a more cost-effective treatment modality with less post-operative complications; however, it risks poor hemostasis intraoperatively. Patient satisfaction is common post-therapy regardless of the treatment method. Over 89% of patients would recommend undergoing treatment for rhinophyma irrespective of treatment type. Treatment options vary, and choice of treatment can be dependent on practitioner and patients’ treatment goals. Dove 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7429105/ /pubmed/32848439 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S201290 Text en © 2020 Chauhan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Chauhan, Ruvi
Loewenstein, Scott N
Hassanein, Aladdin H
Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management
title Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management
title_full Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management
title_fullStr Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management
title_full_unstemmed Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management
title_short Rhinophyma: Prevalence, Severity, Impact and Management
title_sort rhinophyma: prevalence, severity, impact and management
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848439
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S201290
work_keys_str_mv AT chauhanruvi rhinophymaprevalenceseverityimpactandmanagement
AT loewensteinscottn rhinophymaprevalenceseverityimpactandmanagement
AT hassaneinaladdinh rhinophymaprevalenceseverityimpactandmanagement