Cargando…
In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive and lung-protective ventilation techniques may improve outcomes for patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing airway pressures. These less invasive techniques can fail due to hyper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00329-9 |
_version_ | 1783571265913618432 |
---|---|
author | May, Alexandra G. Orizondo, Ryan A. Frankowski, Brian J. Ye, Sang-Ho Kocyildirim, Ergin Wagner, William R. D’Cunha, Jonathan Federspiel, William J. |
author_facet | May, Alexandra G. Orizondo, Ryan A. Frankowski, Brian J. Ye, Sang-Ho Kocyildirim, Ergin Wagner, William R. D’Cunha, Jonathan Federspiel, William J. |
author_sort | May, Alexandra G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-invasive and lung-protective ventilation techniques may improve outcomes for patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing airway pressures. These less invasive techniques can fail due to hypercapnia and require transitioning patients to invasive mechanical ventilation. Extracorporeal CO(2) removal devices remove CO(2) independent of the lungs thereby controlling the hypercapnia and permitting non-invasive or lung-protective ventilation techniques. We are developing the Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System as a platform technology capable of providing three levels of respiratory assist: adult and pediatric full respiratory support and adult low-flow CO(2) removal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of our device to achieve low-flow CO(2) removal. METHODS: The Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System was connected to 6 healthy sheep via a 15.5 Fr dual-lumen catheter placed in the external jugular vein. The animals were recovered and tethered within a pen while supported by the device for 7 days. The pump speed was set to achieve a targeted blood flow of 500 mL/min. The extracorporeal CO(2) removal rate was measured daily at a sweep gas independent regime. Hematological parameters were measured pre-operatively and regularly throughout the study. Histopathological samples of the end organs were taken at the end of each study. RESULTS: All animals survived the surgery and generally tolerated the device well. One animal required early termination due to a pulmonary embolism. Intra-device thrombus formation occurred in a single animal due to improper anticoagulation. The average CO(2) removal rate (normalized to an inlet pCO(2) of 45 mmHg) was 75.6 ± 4.7 mL/min and did not significantly change over the course of the study (p > 0.05). No signs of consistent hemolysis or end organ damage were observed. CONCLUSION: These in vivo results indicate positive performance of the Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System as a low-flow CO(2) removal device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7429452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74294522020-08-17 In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device May, Alexandra G. Orizondo, Ryan A. Frankowski, Brian J. Ye, Sang-Ho Kocyildirim, Ergin Wagner, William R. D’Cunha, Jonathan Federspiel, William J. Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Non-invasive and lung-protective ventilation techniques may improve outcomes for patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing airway pressures. These less invasive techniques can fail due to hypercapnia and require transitioning patients to invasive mechanical ventilation. Extracorporeal CO(2) removal devices remove CO(2) independent of the lungs thereby controlling the hypercapnia and permitting non-invasive or lung-protective ventilation techniques. We are developing the Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System as a platform technology capable of providing three levels of respiratory assist: adult and pediatric full respiratory support and adult low-flow CO(2) removal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of our device to achieve low-flow CO(2) removal. METHODS: The Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System was connected to 6 healthy sheep via a 15.5 Fr dual-lumen catheter placed in the external jugular vein. The animals were recovered and tethered within a pen while supported by the device for 7 days. The pump speed was set to achieve a targeted blood flow of 500 mL/min. The extracorporeal CO(2) removal rate was measured daily at a sweep gas independent regime. Hematological parameters were measured pre-operatively and regularly throughout the study. Histopathological samples of the end organs were taken at the end of each study. RESULTS: All animals survived the surgery and generally tolerated the device well. One animal required early termination due to a pulmonary embolism. Intra-device thrombus formation occurred in a single animal due to improper anticoagulation. The average CO(2) removal rate (normalized to an inlet pCO(2) of 45 mmHg) was 75.6 ± 4.7 mL/min and did not significantly change over the course of the study (p > 0.05). No signs of consistent hemolysis or end organ damage were observed. CONCLUSION: These in vivo results indicate positive performance of the Modular Extracorporeal Lung Assist System as a low-flow CO(2) removal device. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7429452/ /pubmed/32804310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00329-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research May, Alexandra G. Orizondo, Ryan A. Frankowski, Brian J. Ye, Sang-Ho Kocyildirim, Ergin Wagner, William R. D’Cunha, Jonathan Federspiel, William J. In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
title | In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
title_full | In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
title_fullStr | In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
title_full_unstemmed | In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
title_short | In vivo testing of the low-flow CO(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
title_sort | in vivo testing of the low-flow co(2) removal application of a compact, platform respiratory device |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00329-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayalexandrag invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT orizondoryana invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT frankowskibrianj invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT yesangho invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT kocyildirimergin invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT wagnerwilliamr invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT dcunhajonathan invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice AT federspielwilliamj invivotestingofthelowflowco2removalapplicationofacompactplatformrespiratorydevice |