Cargando…
Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons
BACKGROUND: Correct sizing is challenging in radial head replacement and no consensus exists on the implant’s optimal height and width to avoid elbow stiffness and instability. Studies exists, suggesting how to appropriately choose the implant size, but the manner by which the fracture pattern influ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer India
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00039-0 |
_version_ | 1783571293369532416 |
---|---|
author | Cucchi, Davide Luceri, Francesco Celli, Andrea Menon, Alessandra Barco, Raul Wegmann, Kilian Randelli, Pietro Eygendaal, Denise Arrigoni, Paolo |
author_facet | Cucchi, Davide Luceri, Francesco Celli, Andrea Menon, Alessandra Barco, Raul Wegmann, Kilian Randelli, Pietro Eygendaal, Denise Arrigoni, Paolo |
author_sort | Cucchi, Davide |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Correct sizing is challenging in radial head replacement and no consensus exists on the implant’s optimal height and width to avoid elbow stiffness and instability. Studies exists, suggesting how to appropriately choose the implant size, but the manner by which the fracture pattern influences the surgeons’ operative choices was not investigated. METHODS: The radial heads of four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were excised, measured, and fractured to simulate four patterns: three fragments (A); four fragments (B); comminuted (C); comminuted with bone loss (D). Nine examiners were asked to indicate first the maximum diameter of the radial heads with the help of dedicated sizing dishes and then the appropriate implant size with trial implants. Accuracy and precision were determined. A coefficient of variation was calculated and agreement was evaluated with the Bland–Altman method. RESULTS: Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with dedicated sizing dish were 96.73% and 93.64%, (best pattern, D; worst, C). Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with trial implants were 99.71% and 90.66% (best pattern, A; worst, D). Frequent modifications occurred between the initial radial head size proposal based on the sizing dish and the radial head size chosen after use of the trial implants (47.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Diameter estimation of radial heads with dedicated sizing dishes may be underestimated in comminuted fractures; when bone loss is present, this may lead to an overestimation, especially when using trial implants. Care is essential to determine the optimal size of the implant and to avoid overlenghtening and oversizing, which can be responsible for implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the manner by which the fracture pattern influences radial head replacement size estimation can help preventing overlenghtening and oversizing during this procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7429655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer India |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74296552020-08-24 Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons Cucchi, Davide Luceri, Francesco Celli, Andrea Menon, Alessandra Barco, Raul Wegmann, Kilian Randelli, Pietro Eygendaal, Denise Arrigoni, Paolo Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Correct sizing is challenging in radial head replacement and no consensus exists on the implant’s optimal height and width to avoid elbow stiffness and instability. Studies exists, suggesting how to appropriately choose the implant size, but the manner by which the fracture pattern influences the surgeons’ operative choices was not investigated. METHODS: The radial heads of four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were excised, measured, and fractured to simulate four patterns: three fragments (A); four fragments (B); comminuted (C); comminuted with bone loss (D). Nine examiners were asked to indicate first the maximum diameter of the radial heads with the help of dedicated sizing dishes and then the appropriate implant size with trial implants. Accuracy and precision were determined. A coefficient of variation was calculated and agreement was evaluated with the Bland–Altman method. RESULTS: Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with dedicated sizing dish were 96.73% and 93.64%, (best pattern, D; worst, C). Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with trial implants were 99.71% and 90.66% (best pattern, A; worst, D). Frequent modifications occurred between the initial radial head size proposal based on the sizing dish and the radial head size chosen after use of the trial implants (47.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Diameter estimation of radial heads with dedicated sizing dishes may be underestimated in comminuted fractures; when bone loss is present, this may lead to an overestimation, especially when using trial implants. Care is essential to determine the optimal size of the implant and to avoid overlenghtening and oversizing, which can be responsible for implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the manner by which the fracture pattern influences radial head replacement size estimation can help preventing overlenghtening and oversizing during this procedure. Springer India 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7429655/ /pubmed/32843951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00039-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cucchi, Davide Luceri, Francesco Celli, Andrea Menon, Alessandra Barco, Raul Wegmann, Kilian Randelli, Pietro Eygendaal, Denise Arrigoni, Paolo Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons |
title | Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons |
title_full | Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons |
title_fullStr | Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons |
title_full_unstemmed | Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons |
title_short | Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons |
title_sort | fracture pattern influences radial head replacement size determination among experienced elbow surgeons |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00039-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cucchidavide fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT lucerifrancesco fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT celliandrea fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT menonalessandra fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT barcoraul fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT wegmannkilian fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT randellipietro fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT eygendaaldenise fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT arrigonipaolo fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons AT fracturepatterninfluencesradialheadreplacementsizedeterminationamongexperiencedelbowsurgeons |