Cargando…
Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon
BACKGROUND: In the context of scaling the viral load in resource limited settings, following HIV infected patient’s adults and children with CD4+ T-lymphocyte count still very important in settings where the decentralization of treatment still has some challenges. Effective HIV monitoring in these r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-020-00309-9 |
_version_ | 1783571295749799936 |
---|---|
author | Sagnia, Bertrand Mbakop Ghomsi, Fabrice Gutierrez, Ana Sosso, Samuel Kamgaing, Rachel Nanfack, Aubin Joseph Nji, Nadesh Ambada, Georgia Lissom, Abel Tchouangueu, Thibaut Flaurant Ngu Ndengkoh, Loveline Domkam, Irenée Nchinda, Godwin Ndjolo, Alexis |
author_facet | Sagnia, Bertrand Mbakop Ghomsi, Fabrice Gutierrez, Ana Sosso, Samuel Kamgaing, Rachel Nanfack, Aubin Joseph Nji, Nadesh Ambada, Georgia Lissom, Abel Tchouangueu, Thibaut Flaurant Ngu Ndengkoh, Loveline Domkam, Irenée Nchinda, Godwin Ndjolo, Alexis |
author_sort | Sagnia, Bertrand |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the context of scaling the viral load in resource limited settings, following HIV infected patient’s adults and children with CD4+ T-lymphocyte count still very important in settings where the decentralization of treatment still has some challenges. Effective HIV monitoring in these resource-constrained settings needs affordable and reliable CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration methods. We investigated the validity of a BD FACSPresto POC which is a dedicated system for enumeration that uses immunofluorescent technologies. In this study, we have assessed the sensitivity, specificity and correlation between most representative flow cytometry instruments present in Cameroon with more than 5000 CD4 T cells tests per year including FACSCalibur, FACSCount, and PIMA POC from Becton–Dickinson and ALERE respectively. METHODS: 268 patients aged from 1 to 72 years old were enrolled and included in the study after inform consent. The BD FACSPresto POC CD4+ T cell technology was placed at CIRCB and operated by technician staff. HIV infected patients were from Chantal BIYA international reference Center (CIRCB), Centre de Sante Catholique de NKOLODOM, Centre de Sante Catholique de BIKOP and CASS de Nkolndongo—Yaounde We compared the accuracy of the BD FACSPresto and three existing reference technologies with more than 5000 tests per year like FACSCalibur, FACSCount and PIMA according to the number of CD4 test done per year and their repartition in the country. Bland–Altman method and correlation analysis were used to estimate mean bias and 95% limits of agreement and to compare the methods, including analysis by subgroup of participant gestational age. In addition sensitivity and specificity were determined. Statistical significance was set at P-value < 0.05. RESULTS: The BD FACSPresto POC system has excellent precision, accuracy and linearity for CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration. Good correlations were obtained between the BD FACSPresto poc system and other single platform methods. Bland–Altman plots showed interchangeability between two machines mean bias BD-FACSPresto vs PIMA = − 126,522(− 161,221 to − 91,822) BD-FACSPresto vs FACSCount = − 38,708 (− 58,935 to − 18,482) and FACSPresto vs FACSCALIBUR = 0.791(− 11,908 to 13,491). Mean difference with Absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte values obtained from the BD FACSPresto system correlated well with PIMA, FACSCount, and FACSCalibur method with R(2) equal to 0.88, 0.92 and 0.968 respectively with P < 0.001 for all. The mean comparison between values obtained from BD FACSPresto with PIMA, FACSCount, and FACSCalibur using paired T test give P = 0.17, P = 0.5 and P = 0.6 respectively meaning that there is no significant differences between values obtained with BD FACSPresto and PIMA, FACSCount or FACSCalibur CD4 enumeration machines. Further analysis revealed close agreement between all the three instruments with no significant difference between the forth methods (P = 0.91). CONCLUSION: This BD-FACSPresto POC system is a simple, robust and reliable system for enumeration of absolute and percentage of CD4+ T-lymphocytes especially suitable for remote areas with limited resources. Having one BD-FACSPresto POC system easy to use, should reduce the cost and thus increase and improved access to CD4 testing for HIV infected patients in resource-constrained countries. BD-FACSPresto POC CD4 will enable reduction in patient time and improve the overall quality of ART service count and may improve test access in remote areas. This technology can allow for greater decentralization and wider access to CD4 testing and ART. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7429678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74296782020-08-18 Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon Sagnia, Bertrand Mbakop Ghomsi, Fabrice Gutierrez, Ana Sosso, Samuel Kamgaing, Rachel Nanfack, Aubin Joseph Nji, Nadesh Ambada, Georgia Lissom, Abel Tchouangueu, Thibaut Flaurant Ngu Ndengkoh, Loveline Domkam, Irenée Nchinda, Godwin Ndjolo, Alexis AIDS Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: In the context of scaling the viral load in resource limited settings, following HIV infected patient’s adults and children with CD4+ T-lymphocyte count still very important in settings where the decentralization of treatment still has some challenges. Effective HIV monitoring in these resource-constrained settings needs affordable and reliable CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration methods. We investigated the validity of a BD FACSPresto POC which is a dedicated system for enumeration that uses immunofluorescent technologies. In this study, we have assessed the sensitivity, specificity and correlation between most representative flow cytometry instruments present in Cameroon with more than 5000 CD4 T cells tests per year including FACSCalibur, FACSCount, and PIMA POC from Becton–Dickinson and ALERE respectively. METHODS: 268 patients aged from 1 to 72 years old were enrolled and included in the study after inform consent. The BD FACSPresto POC CD4+ T cell technology was placed at CIRCB and operated by technician staff. HIV infected patients were from Chantal BIYA international reference Center (CIRCB), Centre de Sante Catholique de NKOLODOM, Centre de Sante Catholique de BIKOP and CASS de Nkolndongo—Yaounde We compared the accuracy of the BD FACSPresto and three existing reference technologies with more than 5000 tests per year like FACSCalibur, FACSCount and PIMA according to the number of CD4 test done per year and their repartition in the country. Bland–Altman method and correlation analysis were used to estimate mean bias and 95% limits of agreement and to compare the methods, including analysis by subgroup of participant gestational age. In addition sensitivity and specificity were determined. Statistical significance was set at P-value < 0.05. RESULTS: The BD FACSPresto POC system has excellent precision, accuracy and linearity for CD4+ T lymphocytes enumeration. Good correlations were obtained between the BD FACSPresto poc system and other single platform methods. Bland–Altman plots showed interchangeability between two machines mean bias BD-FACSPresto vs PIMA = − 126,522(− 161,221 to − 91,822) BD-FACSPresto vs FACSCount = − 38,708 (− 58,935 to − 18,482) and FACSPresto vs FACSCALIBUR = 0.791(− 11,908 to 13,491). Mean difference with Absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte values obtained from the BD FACSPresto system correlated well with PIMA, FACSCount, and FACSCalibur method with R(2) equal to 0.88, 0.92 and 0.968 respectively with P < 0.001 for all. The mean comparison between values obtained from BD FACSPresto with PIMA, FACSCount, and FACSCalibur using paired T test give P = 0.17, P = 0.5 and P = 0.6 respectively meaning that there is no significant differences between values obtained with BD FACSPresto and PIMA, FACSCount or FACSCalibur CD4 enumeration machines. Further analysis revealed close agreement between all the three instruments with no significant difference between the forth methods (P = 0.91). CONCLUSION: This BD-FACSPresto POC system is a simple, robust and reliable system for enumeration of absolute and percentage of CD4+ T-lymphocytes especially suitable for remote areas with limited resources. Having one BD-FACSPresto POC system easy to use, should reduce the cost and thus increase and improved access to CD4 testing for HIV infected patients in resource-constrained countries. BD-FACSPresto POC CD4 will enable reduction in patient time and improve the overall quality of ART service count and may improve test access in remote areas. This technology can allow for greater decentralization and wider access to CD4 testing and ART. BioMed Central 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7429678/ /pubmed/32799909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-020-00309-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sagnia, Bertrand Mbakop Ghomsi, Fabrice Gutierrez, Ana Sosso, Samuel Kamgaing, Rachel Nanfack, Aubin Joseph Nji, Nadesh Ambada, Georgia Lissom, Abel Tchouangueu, Thibaut Flaurant Ngu Ndengkoh, Loveline Domkam, Irenée Nchinda, Godwin Ndjolo, Alexis Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon |
title | Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon |
title_full | Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon |
title_fullStr | Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon |
title_short | Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon |
title_sort | performance of the bd facspresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional cd4 instruments in cameroon |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-020-00309-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagniabertrand performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT mbakopghomsifabrice performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT gutierrezana performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT sossosamuel performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT kamgaingrachel performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT nanfackaubinjoseph performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT njinadesh performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT ambadageorgia performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT lissomabel performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT tchouangueuthibautflaurant performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT ngundengkohloveline performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT domkamirenee performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT nchindagodwin performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon AT ndjoloalexis performanceofthebdfacsprestoneartopatientanalyzerincomparisonwithrepresentativeconventionalcd4instrumentsincameroon |