Cargando…
Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of induction of labour comparing use of two methods in the outpatient setting. METHODS: An open-label feasibility RCT was conducted in two UK maternity units from October 2017 to March 2019. Women age...
Autores principales: | Bhide, Amarnath, Sedgwick, Philip, Barrett, Barbara, Cupples, Georgina, Coates, Rose, Goode, Rosie, Linton, Sandra, McCourt, Christine |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00661-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Prediction of an effective cervical ripenning in the induction of labour using vaginal dinoprostone
por: López Jiménez, Nuria, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Probit Analysis
por: White, Colin
Publicado: (1972) -
Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Ting, Ning-Shiuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients
por: Yan, Jinjing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)