Cargando…

Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions

The purpose of this theoretical study was to estimate the effects of body size and countermeasure (CM) exercise in an all-male crew composed of individuals drawn from a height range representative of current space agency requirements upon total energy expenditure (TEE), oxygen (O(2)) consumption, ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Jonathan P. R., Green, David A., Weerts, Guillaume, Cheuvront, Samuel N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70054-6
_version_ 1783571333457641472
author Scott, Jonathan P. R.
Green, David A.
Weerts, Guillaume
Cheuvront, Samuel N.
author_facet Scott, Jonathan P. R.
Green, David A.
Weerts, Guillaume
Cheuvront, Samuel N.
author_sort Scott, Jonathan P. R.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this theoretical study was to estimate the effects of body size and countermeasure (CM) exercise in an all-male crew composed of individuals drawn from a height range representative of current space agency requirements upon total energy expenditure (TEE), oxygen (O(2)) consumption, carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and metabolic heat (H(prod)) production, and water requirements for hydration, during space exploration missions. Using a height range of 1.50- to 1.90-m, and assuming geometric similarity across this range, estimates were derived for a four-person male crew (age: 40-years; BMI: 26.5-kg/m(2); resting VO(2) and VO(2max): 3.3- and 43.4-mL/kg/min) on 30- to 1,080-d missions, without and with, ISS-like CM exercise (modelled as 2 × 30-min aerobic exercise at 75% VO(2max), 6-d/week). Where spaceflight-specific data/equations were not available, terrestrial data/equations were used. Body size alone increased 24-h TEE (+ 44%), O(2) consumption (+ 60%), CO(2) (+ 60%) and H(prod) (+ 60%) production, and water requirements (+ 19%). With CM exercise, the increases were + 29 to 32%, + 31%, + 35%, + 42% and + 23 to 33% respectively, across the height range. Compared with a ‘small-sized’ (1.50-m) crew without CM exercise, a ‘large-sized’ (1.90-m) crew exercising would require an additional 996-MJ of energy, 52.5 × 10(3)-L of O(2) and 183.6-L of water, and produce an additional 44.0 × 10(3)-L of CO(2) and 874-MJ of heat each month. This study provides the first insight into the potential implications of body size and the use of ISS-like CM exercise upon the provision of life-support during exploration missions. Whilst closed-loop life-support (O(2), water and CO(2)) systems may be possible, strategies to minimize and meet crew metabolic energy needs, estimated in this study to increase by 996-MJ per month with body size and CM exercise, are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7429865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74298652020-08-18 Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions Scott, Jonathan P. R. Green, David A. Weerts, Guillaume Cheuvront, Samuel N. Sci Rep Article The purpose of this theoretical study was to estimate the effects of body size and countermeasure (CM) exercise in an all-male crew composed of individuals drawn from a height range representative of current space agency requirements upon total energy expenditure (TEE), oxygen (O(2)) consumption, carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and metabolic heat (H(prod)) production, and water requirements for hydration, during space exploration missions. Using a height range of 1.50- to 1.90-m, and assuming geometric similarity across this range, estimates were derived for a four-person male crew (age: 40-years; BMI: 26.5-kg/m(2); resting VO(2) and VO(2max): 3.3- and 43.4-mL/kg/min) on 30- to 1,080-d missions, without and with, ISS-like CM exercise (modelled as 2 × 30-min aerobic exercise at 75% VO(2max), 6-d/week). Where spaceflight-specific data/equations were not available, terrestrial data/equations were used. Body size alone increased 24-h TEE (+ 44%), O(2) consumption (+ 60%), CO(2) (+ 60%) and H(prod) (+ 60%) production, and water requirements (+ 19%). With CM exercise, the increases were + 29 to 32%, + 31%, + 35%, + 42% and + 23 to 33% respectively, across the height range. Compared with a ‘small-sized’ (1.50-m) crew without CM exercise, a ‘large-sized’ (1.90-m) crew exercising would require an additional 996-MJ of energy, 52.5 × 10(3)-L of O(2) and 183.6-L of water, and produce an additional 44.0 × 10(3)-L of CO(2) and 874-MJ of heat each month. This study provides the first insight into the potential implications of body size and the use of ISS-like CM exercise upon the provision of life-support during exploration missions. Whilst closed-loop life-support (O(2), water and CO(2)) systems may be possible, strategies to minimize and meet crew metabolic energy needs, estimated in this study to increase by 996-MJ per month with body size and CM exercise, are required. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7429865/ /pubmed/32796944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70054-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Scott, Jonathan P. R.
Green, David A.
Weerts, Guillaume
Cheuvront, Samuel N.
Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
title Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
title_full Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
title_fullStr Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
title_full_unstemmed Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
title_short Body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
title_sort body size and its implications upon resource utilization during human space exploration missions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70054-6
work_keys_str_mv AT scottjonathanpr bodysizeanditsimplicationsuponresourceutilizationduringhumanspaceexplorationmissions
AT greendavida bodysizeanditsimplicationsuponresourceutilizationduringhumanspaceexplorationmissions
AT weertsguillaume bodysizeanditsimplicationsuponresourceutilizationduringhumanspaceexplorationmissions
AT cheuvrontsamueln bodysizeanditsimplicationsuponresourceutilizationduringhumanspaceexplorationmissions