Cargando…

Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Ischemia–reperfusion injury is harmful in partial nephrectomy (PN) in renal cell carcinoma. Choosing an appropriate surgical method is important to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of segmental artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jinhong, Xu, Shuxiong, Yao, Biao, Xu, Run, Xu, Yuangao, Sun, Fa, Qiu, Qian, Shi, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w
_version_ 1783571340123439104
author Xu, Jinhong
Xu, Shuxiong
Yao, Biao
Xu, Run
Xu, Yuangao
Sun, Fa
Qiu, Qian
Shi, Hua
author_facet Xu, Jinhong
Xu, Shuxiong
Yao, Biao
Xu, Run
Xu, Yuangao
Sun, Fa
Qiu, Qian
Shi, Hua
author_sort Xu, Jinhong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ischemia–reperfusion injury is harmful in partial nephrectomy (PN) in renal cell carcinoma. Choosing an appropriate surgical method is important to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of segmental artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping (MAC) on patients who underwent PN. METHODS: Studies from January 2008 to November 2019 were identified by an electronic search of English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese National Knowledge Internet, without language restriction. Two reviewers were involved in the trial. The effects on operation time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), length of hospital stay (LOS), blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and positive surgery margin (PSM) were evaluated using Stata software. Standardized mean difference (SMD, for continuous data) and pooled odds ratios (for count data) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included. SAC decreased the 1-week (SMD = − 0.973; 95% CI = − 1.414, − 0.532; P = 0.000), 1-month (SMD = − 0.411; 95% CI = − 0.769, − 0.053; P = 0.025), and 3-month (affected kidney: SMD = − 0.914; 95% CI = − 1.662, − 0.617; P = 0.000) percentages of postoperative changes in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) between the SAC and MAC groups. Sub-group analysis showed that the SAC group had longer OT (SMD = 0.562; 95% CI = 0.252, 0.871; P = 0.000) than the MAC group. However, no differences were observed in the OT, WIT, LOS, blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and PSM between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SAC is superior to MAC in terms of short-term postoperative renal function recovery. The use of SAC or MAC depends on tumor size, location, surgical modality, and surgeon’s judgments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7429898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74298982020-08-18 Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis Xu, Jinhong Xu, Shuxiong Yao, Biao Xu, Run Xu, Yuangao Sun, Fa Qiu, Qian Shi, Hua World J Surg Oncol Research OBJECTIVES: Ischemia–reperfusion injury is harmful in partial nephrectomy (PN) in renal cell carcinoma. Choosing an appropriate surgical method is important to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of segmental artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping (MAC) on patients who underwent PN. METHODS: Studies from January 2008 to November 2019 were identified by an electronic search of English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese National Knowledge Internet, without language restriction. Two reviewers were involved in the trial. The effects on operation time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), length of hospital stay (LOS), blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and positive surgery margin (PSM) were evaluated using Stata software. Standardized mean difference (SMD, for continuous data) and pooled odds ratios (for count data) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included. SAC decreased the 1-week (SMD = − 0.973; 95% CI = − 1.414, − 0.532; P = 0.000), 1-month (SMD = − 0.411; 95% CI = − 0.769, − 0.053; P = 0.025), and 3-month (affected kidney: SMD = − 0.914; 95% CI = − 1.662, − 0.617; P = 0.000) percentages of postoperative changes in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) between the SAC and MAC groups. Sub-group analysis showed that the SAC group had longer OT (SMD = 0.562; 95% CI = 0.252, 0.871; P = 0.000) than the MAC group. However, no differences were observed in the OT, WIT, LOS, blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and PSM between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SAC is superior to MAC in terms of short-term postoperative renal function recovery. The use of SAC or MAC depends on tumor size, location, surgical modality, and surgeon’s judgments. BioMed Central 2020-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7429898/ /pubmed/32799867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Jinhong
Xu, Shuxiong
Yao, Biao
Xu, Run
Xu, Yuangao
Sun, Fa
Qiu, Qian
Shi, Hua
Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
title Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
title_full Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
title_fullStr Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
title_short Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
title_sort segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w
work_keys_str_mv AT xujinhong segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT xushuxiong segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT yaobiao segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT xurun segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT xuyuangao segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT sunfa segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT qiuqian segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis
AT shihua segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis