Cargando…
Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Ischemia–reperfusion injury is harmful in partial nephrectomy (PN) in renal cell carcinoma. Choosing an appropriate surgical method is important to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of segmental artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w |
_version_ | 1783571340123439104 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Jinhong Xu, Shuxiong Yao, Biao Xu, Run Xu, Yuangao Sun, Fa Qiu, Qian Shi, Hua |
author_facet | Xu, Jinhong Xu, Shuxiong Yao, Biao Xu, Run Xu, Yuangao Sun, Fa Qiu, Qian Shi, Hua |
author_sort | Xu, Jinhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Ischemia–reperfusion injury is harmful in partial nephrectomy (PN) in renal cell carcinoma. Choosing an appropriate surgical method is important to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of segmental artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping (MAC) on patients who underwent PN. METHODS: Studies from January 2008 to November 2019 were identified by an electronic search of English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese National Knowledge Internet, without language restriction. Two reviewers were involved in the trial. The effects on operation time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), length of hospital stay (LOS), blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and positive surgery margin (PSM) were evaluated using Stata software. Standardized mean difference (SMD, for continuous data) and pooled odds ratios (for count data) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included. SAC decreased the 1-week (SMD = − 0.973; 95% CI = − 1.414, − 0.532; P = 0.000), 1-month (SMD = − 0.411; 95% CI = − 0.769, − 0.053; P = 0.025), and 3-month (affected kidney: SMD = − 0.914; 95% CI = − 1.662, − 0.617; P = 0.000) percentages of postoperative changes in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) between the SAC and MAC groups. Sub-group analysis showed that the SAC group had longer OT (SMD = 0.562; 95% CI = 0.252, 0.871; P = 0.000) than the MAC group. However, no differences were observed in the OT, WIT, LOS, blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and PSM between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SAC is superior to MAC in terms of short-term postoperative renal function recovery. The use of SAC or MAC depends on tumor size, location, surgical modality, and surgeon’s judgments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7429898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74298982020-08-18 Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis Xu, Jinhong Xu, Shuxiong Yao, Biao Xu, Run Xu, Yuangao Sun, Fa Qiu, Qian Shi, Hua World J Surg Oncol Research OBJECTIVES: Ischemia–reperfusion injury is harmful in partial nephrectomy (PN) in renal cell carcinoma. Choosing an appropriate surgical method is important to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of segmental artery clamping (SAC) and main renal artery clamping (MAC) on patients who underwent PN. METHODS: Studies from January 2008 to November 2019 were identified by an electronic search of English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese National Knowledge Internet, without language restriction. Two reviewers were involved in the trial. The effects on operation time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), length of hospital stay (LOS), blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and positive surgery margin (PSM) were evaluated using Stata software. Standardized mean difference (SMD, for continuous data) and pooled odds ratios (for count data) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included. SAC decreased the 1-week (SMD = − 0.973; 95% CI = − 1.414, − 0.532; P = 0.000), 1-month (SMD = − 0.411; 95% CI = − 0.769, − 0.053; P = 0.025), and 3-month (affected kidney: SMD = − 0.914; 95% CI = − 1.662, − 0.617; P = 0.000) percentages of postoperative changes in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) between the SAC and MAC groups. Sub-group analysis showed that the SAC group had longer OT (SMD = 0.562; 95% CI = 0.252, 0.871; P = 0.000) than the MAC group. However, no differences were observed in the OT, WIT, LOS, blood transfusion rate, postoperative complication rate, Clavien classification (≥ 3), and PSM between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SAC is superior to MAC in terms of short-term postoperative renal function recovery. The use of SAC or MAC depends on tumor size, location, surgical modality, and surgeon’s judgments. BioMed Central 2020-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7429898/ /pubmed/32799867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Xu, Jinhong Xu, Shuxiong Yao, Biao Xu, Run Xu, Yuangao Sun, Fa Qiu, Qian Shi, Hua Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
title | Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
title_full | Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
title_short | Segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
title_sort | segmental artery clamping versus main renal artery clamping in nephron-sparing surgery: updated meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32799867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01990-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujinhong segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT xushuxiong segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT yaobiao segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT xurun segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT xuyuangao segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT sunfa segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT qiuqian segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis AT shihua segmentalarteryclampingversusmainrenalarteryclampinginnephronsparingsurgeryupdatedmetaanalysis |