Cargando…
Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis
Neuropsychiatric disorders are diagnosed based on behavioral criteria, which makes the diagnosis challenging. Objective biomarkers such as neuroimaging are needed, and when coupled with machine learning, can assist the diagnostic decision and increase its reliability. Sixty-four schizophrenia, 36 au...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00965-5 |
_version_ | 1783571351892656128 |
---|---|
author | Yassin, Walid Nakatani, Hironori Zhu, Yinghan Kojima, Masaki Owada, Keiho Kuwabara, Hitoshi Gonoi, Wataru Aoki, Yuta Takao, Hidemasa Natsubori, Tatsunobu Iwashiro, Norichika Kasai, Kiyoto Kano, Yukiko Abe, Osamu Yamasue, Hidenori Koike, Shinsuke |
author_facet | Yassin, Walid Nakatani, Hironori Zhu, Yinghan Kojima, Masaki Owada, Keiho Kuwabara, Hitoshi Gonoi, Wataru Aoki, Yuta Takao, Hidemasa Natsubori, Tatsunobu Iwashiro, Norichika Kasai, Kiyoto Kano, Yukiko Abe, Osamu Yamasue, Hidenori Koike, Shinsuke |
author_sort | Yassin, Walid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuropsychiatric disorders are diagnosed based on behavioral criteria, which makes the diagnosis challenging. Objective biomarkers such as neuroimaging are needed, and when coupled with machine learning, can assist the diagnostic decision and increase its reliability. Sixty-four schizophrenia, 36 autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and 106 typically developing individuals were analyzed. FreeSurfer was used to obtain the data from the participant’s brain scans. Six classifiers were utilized to classify the subjects. Subsequently, 26 ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and 17 first-episode psychosis (FEP) subjects were run through the trained classifiers. Lastly, the classifiers’ output of the patient groups was correlated with their clinical severity. All six classifiers performed relatively well to distinguish the subject groups, especially support vector machine (SVM) and Logistic regression (LR). Cortical thickness and subcortical volume feature groups were most useful for the classification. LR and SVM were highly consistent with clinical indices of ASD. When UHR and FEP groups were run with the trained classifiers, majority of the cases were classified as schizophrenia, none as ASD. Overall, SVM and LR were the best performing classifiers. Cortical thickness and subcortical volume were most useful for the classification, compared to surface area. LR, SVM, and DT’s output were clinically informative. The trained classifiers were able to help predict the diagnostic category of both UHR and FEP Individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7429957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74299572020-08-27 Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis Yassin, Walid Nakatani, Hironori Zhu, Yinghan Kojima, Masaki Owada, Keiho Kuwabara, Hitoshi Gonoi, Wataru Aoki, Yuta Takao, Hidemasa Natsubori, Tatsunobu Iwashiro, Norichika Kasai, Kiyoto Kano, Yukiko Abe, Osamu Yamasue, Hidenori Koike, Shinsuke Transl Psychiatry Article Neuropsychiatric disorders are diagnosed based on behavioral criteria, which makes the diagnosis challenging. Objective biomarkers such as neuroimaging are needed, and when coupled with machine learning, can assist the diagnostic decision and increase its reliability. Sixty-four schizophrenia, 36 autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and 106 typically developing individuals were analyzed. FreeSurfer was used to obtain the data from the participant’s brain scans. Six classifiers were utilized to classify the subjects. Subsequently, 26 ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and 17 first-episode psychosis (FEP) subjects were run through the trained classifiers. Lastly, the classifiers’ output of the patient groups was correlated with their clinical severity. All six classifiers performed relatively well to distinguish the subject groups, especially support vector machine (SVM) and Logistic regression (LR). Cortical thickness and subcortical volume feature groups were most useful for the classification. LR and SVM were highly consistent with clinical indices of ASD. When UHR and FEP groups were run with the trained classifiers, majority of the cases were classified as schizophrenia, none as ASD. Overall, SVM and LR were the best performing classifiers. Cortical thickness and subcortical volume were most useful for the classification, compared to surface area. LR, SVM, and DT’s output were clinically informative. The trained classifiers were able to help predict the diagnostic category of both UHR and FEP Individuals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7429957/ /pubmed/32801298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00965-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Yassin, Walid Nakatani, Hironori Zhu, Yinghan Kojima, Masaki Owada, Keiho Kuwabara, Hitoshi Gonoi, Wataru Aoki, Yuta Takao, Hidemasa Natsubori, Tatsunobu Iwashiro, Norichika Kasai, Kiyoto Kano, Yukiko Abe, Osamu Yamasue, Hidenori Koike, Shinsuke Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
title | Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
title_full | Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
title_fullStr | Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
title_short | Machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
title_sort | machine-learning classification using neuroimaging data in schizophrenia, autism, ultra-high risk and first-episode psychosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00965-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yassinwalid machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT nakatanihironori machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT zhuyinghan machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT kojimamasaki machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT owadakeiho machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT kuwabarahitoshi machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT gonoiwataru machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT aokiyuta machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT takaohidemasa machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT natsuboritatsunobu machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT iwashironorichika machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT kasaikiyoto machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT kanoyukiko machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT abeosamu machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT yamasuehidenori machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis AT koikeshinsuke machinelearningclassificationusingneuroimagingdatainschizophreniaautismultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosis |