Cargando…

Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study

Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wand, Saskia, Heise, Daniel, Hillmann, Nadine, Bireta, Christian, Bräuer, Anselm, von Ahsen, Nicolas, Quintel, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32795187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620946843
_version_ 1783571365934137344
author Wand, Saskia
Heise, Daniel
Hillmann, Nadine
Bireta, Christian
Bräuer, Anselm
von Ahsen, Nicolas
Quintel, Michael
author_facet Wand, Saskia
Heise, Daniel
Hillmann, Nadine
Bireta, Christian
Bräuer, Anselm
von Ahsen, Nicolas
Quintel, Michael
author_sort Wand, Saskia
collection PubMed
description Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to identify an elevated anti-factor Xa activity at different timepoints after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anti-factor Xa activity, heparin/protamine titration and the clotting time ratio of thromboelastometry in the INTEM and HEPTEM were measured at baseline (T1), after the application of protamine (T2) and after the complete application of autologous pump blood (T3). Anti-factor Xa activity decreased significantly between T2 and T3 as well did the absolute number of patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity. Receiver Operating Curve analyses were performed for both point-of-care methods. At T2 neither could identify patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity, while both methods were able to do so at T3 with high sensitivity and specificity. This difference suggests that an interference in the detection of residual heparinization with point-of-care methods exists right after the application of protamine, which seems to subside after a short time span. Nevertheless, results of point-of-care testing for residual heparinization after cardiopulmonary bypass need to be interpreted considering the protamine-heparin ratio and the timepoint of protamine administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74300712020-08-27 Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study Wand, Saskia Heise, Daniel Hillmann, Nadine Bireta, Christian Bräuer, Anselm von Ahsen, Nicolas Quintel, Michael Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Manuscript Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to identify an elevated anti-factor Xa activity at different timepoints after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anti-factor Xa activity, heparin/protamine titration and the clotting time ratio of thromboelastometry in the INTEM and HEPTEM were measured at baseline (T1), after the application of protamine (T2) and after the complete application of autologous pump blood (T3). Anti-factor Xa activity decreased significantly between T2 and T3 as well did the absolute number of patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity. Receiver Operating Curve analyses were performed for both point-of-care methods. At T2 neither could identify patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity, while both methods were able to do so at T3 with high sensitivity and specificity. This difference suggests that an interference in the detection of residual heparinization with point-of-care methods exists right after the application of protamine, which seems to subside after a short time span. Nevertheless, results of point-of-care testing for residual heparinization after cardiopulmonary bypass need to be interpreted considering the protamine-heparin ratio and the timepoint of protamine administration. SAGE Publications 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7430071/ /pubmed/32795187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620946843 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Wand, Saskia
Heise, Daniel
Hillmann, Nadine
Bireta, Christian
Bräuer, Anselm
von Ahsen, Nicolas
Quintel, Michael
Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
title Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
title_full Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
title_fullStr Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
title_short Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
title_sort is there a “blind spot” in point-of-care testing for residual heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass? a prospective, observational cohort study
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32795187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620946843
work_keys_str_mv AT wandsaskia isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT heisedaniel isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT hillmannnadine isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT biretachristian isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT braueranselm isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT vonahsennicolas isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT quintelmichael isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy