Cargando…
Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32795187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620946843 |
_version_ | 1783571365934137344 |
---|---|
author | Wand, Saskia Heise, Daniel Hillmann, Nadine Bireta, Christian Bräuer, Anselm von Ahsen, Nicolas Quintel, Michael |
author_facet | Wand, Saskia Heise, Daniel Hillmann, Nadine Bireta, Christian Bräuer, Anselm von Ahsen, Nicolas Quintel, Michael |
author_sort | Wand, Saskia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to identify an elevated anti-factor Xa activity at different timepoints after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anti-factor Xa activity, heparin/protamine titration and the clotting time ratio of thromboelastometry in the INTEM and HEPTEM were measured at baseline (T1), after the application of protamine (T2) and after the complete application of autologous pump blood (T3). Anti-factor Xa activity decreased significantly between T2 and T3 as well did the absolute number of patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity. Receiver Operating Curve analyses were performed for both point-of-care methods. At T2 neither could identify patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity, while both methods were able to do so at T3 with high sensitivity and specificity. This difference suggests that an interference in the detection of residual heparinization with point-of-care methods exists right after the application of protamine, which seems to subside after a short time span. Nevertheless, results of point-of-care testing for residual heparinization after cardiopulmonary bypass need to be interpreted considering the protamine-heparin ratio and the timepoint of protamine administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7430071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74300712020-08-27 Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study Wand, Saskia Heise, Daniel Hillmann, Nadine Bireta, Christian Bräuer, Anselm von Ahsen, Nicolas Quintel, Michael Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Manuscript Identifying the cause of a bleeding complication after cardiac surgery can be crucial. This study sought to clarify whether the application of unprocessed autologous pump blood influences anti-factor Xa activity after cardiac surgery and evaluated 2 point-of-care methods regarding their ability to identify an elevated anti-factor Xa activity at different timepoints after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anti-factor Xa activity, heparin/protamine titration and the clotting time ratio of thromboelastometry in the INTEM and HEPTEM were measured at baseline (T1), after the application of protamine (T2) and after the complete application of autologous pump blood (T3). Anti-factor Xa activity decreased significantly between T2 and T3 as well did the absolute number of patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity. Receiver Operating Curve analyses were performed for both point-of-care methods. At T2 neither could identify patients with an elevated anti-factor Xa activity, while both methods were able to do so at T3 with high sensitivity and specificity. This difference suggests that an interference in the detection of residual heparinization with point-of-care methods exists right after the application of protamine, which seems to subside after a short time span. Nevertheless, results of point-of-care testing for residual heparinization after cardiopulmonary bypass need to be interpreted considering the protamine-heparin ratio and the timepoint of protamine administration. SAGE Publications 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7430071/ /pubmed/32795187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620946843 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Wand, Saskia Heise, Daniel Hillmann, Nadine Bireta, Christian Bräuer, Anselm von Ahsen, Nicolas Quintel, Michael Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study |
title | Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study |
title_full | Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study |
title_short | Is There a “Blind Spot” in Point-of-Care Testing for Residual Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study |
title_sort | is there a “blind spot” in point-of-care testing for residual heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass? a prospective, observational cohort study |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32795187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620946843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wandsaskia isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT heisedaniel isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT hillmannnadine isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT biretachristian isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT braueranselm isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT vonahsennicolas isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT quintelmichael isthereablindspotinpointofcaretestingforresidualheparinaftercardiopulmonarybypassaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy |