Cargando…

Mobile phone-based e-diary for assessment and enhancement of medications adherence among patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Adherence to multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is essential for realization of their optimal effectiveness and benefits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness and validity of a smartphone-based e-diary as a tool for adherence assessment as well as its effectiveness a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golan, Daniel, Sagiv, Smadar, Glass-Marmor, Lea, Miller, Ariel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217320939309
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Adherence to multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is essential for realization of their optimal effectiveness and benefits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness and validity of a smartphone-based e-diary as a tool for adherence assessment as well as its effectiveness as a promoter of adherence to DMDs. METHODS: An MS tailored e-diary (MyMS&Me) reminded patients to take their DMDs on time. DMD intake was self-recorded in the e-diary by the participants. Three methods of adherence evaluation were compared: e-diary derived, retrospective self-reported, and the medication possession rate (MPR). The proportion of patients with poor adherence to DMDs (defined as MPR <80%) among e-diary users was compared with a control group without intervention. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients downloaded the e-diary (Female: 41 (66%), Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.2 ± 2.2) and 55 controls were enrolled. The median difference between e-diary-derived adherence and the MPR was –3% (95% limits of agreement: −53% to 12%). The median difference between retrospective self-reported adherence and the MPR was 0.3% (95% limits of agreement: −20% to 42%). The proportion of participants with poor adherence to DMDs was similar in the e-diary and control groups (10% vs. 13%, p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial and clinically important disagreement between methods of medication adherence evaluation was noted. Smartphone reminders did not significantly improve the MPR of DMDs.