Cargando…

Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study

BACKGROUND: There is no available evidence for the prevalence of early labour admission to hospital or its association with rates of intervention and clinical outcomes in Australia. The objectives of this study were to: estimate the prevalence of early labour admission in one hospital in Australia;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Yvette D., Armanasco, Ashleigh A., McCosker, Laura, Thompson, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03149-7
_version_ 1783571376424091648
author Miller, Yvette D.
Armanasco, Ashleigh A.
McCosker, Laura
Thompson, Rachel
author_facet Miller, Yvette D.
Armanasco, Ashleigh A.
McCosker, Laura
Thompson, Rachel
author_sort Miller, Yvette D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no available evidence for the prevalence of early labour admission to hospital or its association with rates of intervention and clinical outcomes in Australia. The objectives of this study were to: estimate the prevalence of early labour admission in one hospital in Australia; compare rates of clinical intervention, length of hospital stay and clinical outcomes for women admitted in early (< 4 cm cervical dilatation) or active (≥4 cm) labour; and determine the impact of recent recommendations to define early labour as < 5 cm on the findings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical record data from a random sample of 1223 women from live singleton births recorded between July 2013 and December 2015. Analyses included women who had spontaneous onset of labour at ≥37 weeks gestation whilst not a hospital inpatient, who had not scheduled a caesarean section before labour onset or delivered prior to hospital admission. Associations between timing of hospital admission in labour and clinical intervention, outcomes and hospital stay were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Between 32.4% (< 4 cm) and 52.9% (< 5 cm) of eligible women (N = 697) were admitted to hospital in early labour. After adjustment for potential confounders, women admitted in early labour (< 4 cm) were more likely to have their labour augmented by oxytocin (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI 2.39–5.34), an epidural (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.51–3.41), a caesarean birth (AOR = 3.50, 95% CI 2.10–5.83), more vaginal examinations (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.53–1.95), and their baby admitted to special care nursery (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.01–2.35). Defining early labour as < 5 cm cervical dilatation produced additional significant associations with artificial rupture of membranes (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.02–1.95), assisted vaginal birth (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.12–3.41) neonatal resuscitation (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.01–2.99) and longer maternal hospital stay (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04–1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide preliminary evidence that a notable proportion of labouring women are admitted in early labour and are more likely to experience several medical procedures, neonatal resuscitation and admission to special care nursery, and longer hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74301172020-08-18 Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study Miller, Yvette D. Armanasco, Ashleigh A. McCosker, Laura Thompson, Rachel BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no available evidence for the prevalence of early labour admission to hospital or its association with rates of intervention and clinical outcomes in Australia. The objectives of this study were to: estimate the prevalence of early labour admission in one hospital in Australia; compare rates of clinical intervention, length of hospital stay and clinical outcomes for women admitted in early (< 4 cm cervical dilatation) or active (≥4 cm) labour; and determine the impact of recent recommendations to define early labour as < 5 cm on the findings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical record data from a random sample of 1223 women from live singleton births recorded between July 2013 and December 2015. Analyses included women who had spontaneous onset of labour at ≥37 weeks gestation whilst not a hospital inpatient, who had not scheduled a caesarean section before labour onset or delivered prior to hospital admission. Associations between timing of hospital admission in labour and clinical intervention, outcomes and hospital stay were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Between 32.4% (< 4 cm) and 52.9% (< 5 cm) of eligible women (N = 697) were admitted to hospital in early labour. After adjustment for potential confounders, women admitted in early labour (< 4 cm) were more likely to have their labour augmented by oxytocin (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI 2.39–5.34), an epidural (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.51–3.41), a caesarean birth (AOR = 3.50, 95% CI 2.10–5.83), more vaginal examinations (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.53–1.95), and their baby admitted to special care nursery (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.01–2.35). Defining early labour as < 5 cm cervical dilatation produced additional significant associations with artificial rupture of membranes (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.02–1.95), assisted vaginal birth (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.12–3.41) neonatal resuscitation (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.01–2.99) and longer maternal hospital stay (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04–1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide preliminary evidence that a notable proportion of labouring women are admitted in early labour and are more likely to experience several medical procedures, neonatal resuscitation and admission to special care nursery, and longer hospital stay. BioMed Central 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7430117/ /pubmed/32807137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03149-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miller, Yvette D.
Armanasco, Ashleigh A.
McCosker, Laura
Thompson, Rachel
Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
title Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
title_full Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
title_fullStr Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
title_short Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
title_sort variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03149-7
work_keys_str_mv AT milleryvetted variationsinoutcomesforwomenadmittedtohospitalinearlyversusactivelabouranobservationalstudy
AT armanascoashleigha variationsinoutcomesforwomenadmittedtohospitalinearlyversusactivelabouranobservationalstudy
AT mccoskerlaura variationsinoutcomesforwomenadmittedtohospitalinearlyversusactivelabouranobservationalstudy
AT thompsonrachel variationsinoutcomesforwomenadmittedtohospitalinearlyversusactivelabouranobservationalstudy