Cargando…

Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department

INTRODUCTION: Debriefing is a process of communication that takes place between a team following a clinical case. Debriefing facilitates discussion of individual and team level performance and identifies points of excellence as well as potential errors made. This helps to develop plans to improve su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilmartin, Stephen, Martin, Laura, Kenny, Siobhain, Callanan, Ian, Salter, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000913
_version_ 1783571406886273024
author Gilmartin, Stephen
Martin, Laura
Kenny, Siobhain
Callanan, Ian
Salter, Nigel
author_facet Gilmartin, Stephen
Martin, Laura
Kenny, Siobhain
Callanan, Ian
Salter, Nigel
author_sort Gilmartin, Stephen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Debriefing is a process of communication that takes place between a team following a clinical case. Debriefing facilitates discussion of individual and team level performance and identifies points of excellence as well as potential errors made. This helps to develop plans to improve subsequent performance. While the American Heart Association and the UK Resuscitation Council recommend debriefing following every cardiac arrest attended by a healthcare professional, it has not become part of everyday practice. In the emergency department (ED), this is in part attributable to time pressures and workload. Hot debriefing is a form of debriefing which should occur ‘there and then’ following a clinical event. The aim of this quality improvement project was to introduce hot debriefing to our ED following all cardiac arrests. METHODS: A hot debriefing tool was designed following simulated cardiac arrest scenarios and team feedback. This tool was then introduced to the ED for use after all cardiac arrests. The team lead was asked to complete a debrief form. These completed hot debrief forms were collated monthly and compared with the department’s cardiac arrest register. Any changes made to cardiac arrest management following hot debriefing were recorded. Qualitative feedback was obtained through questionnaires. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, 42% of all cardiac arrest cases were followed by a hot debrief. Practice changes were made to resus room equipment, practitioners’ non-technical skills and the department’s educational activities. 95% of participants felt the hot debriefing tool was of ‘just right’ duration, 100% felt the process helped with their clinical practice, and 90% felt they benefited psychologically from the process. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a hot debriefing tool in our department has led to real-world changes to cardiac arrest care. The process benefits participants’ clinical practice as well as psychological well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74303252020-08-24 Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department Gilmartin, Stephen Martin, Laura Kenny, Siobhain Callanan, Ian Salter, Nigel BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report INTRODUCTION: Debriefing is a process of communication that takes place between a team following a clinical case. Debriefing facilitates discussion of individual and team level performance and identifies points of excellence as well as potential errors made. This helps to develop plans to improve subsequent performance. While the American Heart Association and the UK Resuscitation Council recommend debriefing following every cardiac arrest attended by a healthcare professional, it has not become part of everyday practice. In the emergency department (ED), this is in part attributable to time pressures and workload. Hot debriefing is a form of debriefing which should occur ‘there and then’ following a clinical event. The aim of this quality improvement project was to introduce hot debriefing to our ED following all cardiac arrests. METHODS: A hot debriefing tool was designed following simulated cardiac arrest scenarios and team feedback. This tool was then introduced to the ED for use after all cardiac arrests. The team lead was asked to complete a debrief form. These completed hot debrief forms were collated monthly and compared with the department’s cardiac arrest register. Any changes made to cardiac arrest management following hot debriefing were recorded. Qualitative feedback was obtained through questionnaires. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, 42% of all cardiac arrest cases were followed by a hot debrief. Practice changes were made to resus room equipment, practitioners’ non-technical skills and the department’s educational activities. 95% of participants felt the hot debriefing tool was of ‘just right’ duration, 100% felt the process helped with their clinical practice, and 90% felt they benefited psychologically from the process. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a hot debriefing tool in our department has led to real-world changes to cardiac arrest care. The process benefits participants’ clinical practice as well as psychological well-being. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7430325/ /pubmed/32816864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000913 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Gilmartin, Stephen
Martin, Laura
Kenny, Siobhain
Callanan, Ian
Salter, Nigel
Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
title Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
title_full Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
title_fullStr Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
title_short Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
title_sort promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000913
work_keys_str_mv AT gilmartinstephen promotinghotdebriefinginanemergencydepartment
AT martinlaura promotinghotdebriefinginanemergencydepartment
AT kennysiobhain promotinghotdebriefinginanemergencydepartment
AT callananian promotinghotdebriefinginanemergencydepartment
AT salternigel promotinghotdebriefinginanemergencydepartment