Cargando…

Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies are often associated with high perinatal morbidity and mortality, some of which are severe enough to require a gestational reduction surgery to improve fetal survival and reduce disabilities. While radiofrequency ablation is currently the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Jialei, Cheng, Ziyi, Wu, Tianchen, Wei, Yuan, Wang, Xiaoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034995
_version_ 1783571431155564544
author Xie, Jialei
Cheng, Ziyi
Wu, Tianchen
Wei, Yuan
Wang, Xiaoli
author_facet Xie, Jialei
Cheng, Ziyi
Wu, Tianchen
Wei, Yuan
Wang, Xiaoli
author_sort Xie, Jialei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies are often associated with high perinatal morbidity and mortality, some of which are severe enough to require a gestational reduction surgery to improve fetal survival and reduce disabilities. While radiofrequency ablation is currently the most commonly used procedure with higher fetal survival and fewer maternal and fetal complications compared with other surgical methods, the therapeutic effect of microwave ablation (MWA) is reported to be better, presumably due to the higher thermal effect and fewer restrictions. Currently there is limited evidence to prove the feasibility of MWA for selective reduction. The aim of this pilot study is to explore the feasibility, efficacy and safety of MWA reduction for severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies and may provide evidence for using the MWA in intrauterine surgeries extensively. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a study protocol for a parallel-design pilot randomised controlled trial. 60 eligible patients with severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies will be randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to MWA group and radiofrequency group. Patients will be followed up until 6 months of age of the retained fetal. The primary analysis will compare the rates of neonatal survival at 28 days to evaluate the effect of MWA. The study will also evaluate the safety profile of MWA including the occurrence of postoperative adverse events and maternal and fetal complications. Additional secondary outcomes to be explored include the condition of neonatal asphyxia and the growth of surviving fetus at 6 months. Outcomes will be analysed by both a frequentist and the Bayesian statistical approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Peking University Third Hospital (Beijing, China). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04014452; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74304512020-08-24 Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial Xie, Jialei Cheng, Ziyi Wu, Tianchen Wei, Yuan Wang, Xiaoli BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies are often associated with high perinatal morbidity and mortality, some of which are severe enough to require a gestational reduction surgery to improve fetal survival and reduce disabilities. While radiofrequency ablation is currently the most commonly used procedure with higher fetal survival and fewer maternal and fetal complications compared with other surgical methods, the therapeutic effect of microwave ablation (MWA) is reported to be better, presumably due to the higher thermal effect and fewer restrictions. Currently there is limited evidence to prove the feasibility of MWA for selective reduction. The aim of this pilot study is to explore the feasibility, efficacy and safety of MWA reduction for severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies and may provide evidence for using the MWA in intrauterine surgeries extensively. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a study protocol for a parallel-design pilot randomised controlled trial. 60 eligible patients with severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies will be randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to MWA group and radiofrequency group. Patients will be followed up until 6 months of age of the retained fetal. The primary analysis will compare the rates of neonatal survival at 28 days to evaluate the effect of MWA. The study will also evaluate the safety profile of MWA including the occurrence of postoperative adverse events and maternal and fetal complications. Additional secondary outcomes to be explored include the condition of neonatal asphyxia and the growth of surviving fetus at 6 months. Outcomes will be analysed by both a frequentist and the Bayesian statistical approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Peking University Third Hospital (Beijing, China). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04014452; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7430451/ /pubmed/32792427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034995 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Xie, Jialei
Cheng, Ziyi
Wu, Tianchen
Wei, Yuan
Wang, Xiaoli
Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in china:protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034995
work_keys_str_mv AT xiejialei microwaveablationversusradiofrequencyablationforthetreatmentofseverecomplicatedmonochorionicpregnanciesinchinaprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chengziyi microwaveablationversusradiofrequencyablationforthetreatmentofseverecomplicatedmonochorionicpregnanciesinchinaprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wutianchen microwaveablationversusradiofrequencyablationforthetreatmentofseverecomplicatedmonochorionicpregnanciesinchinaprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weiyuan microwaveablationversusradiofrequencyablationforthetreatmentofseverecomplicatedmonochorionicpregnanciesinchinaprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangxiaoli microwaveablationversusradiofrequencyablationforthetreatmentofseverecomplicatedmonochorionicpregnanciesinchinaprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial