Cargando…

Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study

OBJECTIVE: Infants enter care at varying rates across local authorities (LAs) in England, but evidence is lacking on what is driving these differences. With this ecological study, we aimed to explore the extent to which adversity indicated within women’s hospitalisation histories, predelivery, expla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Rachel Jane, Jay, Matthew Alexander, Wijlaars, Linda Petronella Martina Maria, De Stavola, Bianca, Syed, Shabeer, Bedston, Stuart John, Gilbert, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036564
_version_ 1783571437272956928
author Pearson, Rachel Jane
Jay, Matthew Alexander
Wijlaars, Linda Petronella Martina Maria
De Stavola, Bianca
Syed, Shabeer
Bedston, Stuart John
Gilbert, Ruth
author_facet Pearson, Rachel Jane
Jay, Matthew Alexander
Wijlaars, Linda Petronella Martina Maria
De Stavola, Bianca
Syed, Shabeer
Bedston, Stuart John
Gilbert, Ruth
author_sort Pearson, Rachel Jane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Infants enter care at varying rates across local authorities (LAs) in England, but evidence is lacking on what is driving these differences. With this ecological study, we aimed to explore the extent to which adversity indicated within women’s hospitalisation histories, predelivery, explained the rate of infant entry into care. METHODS: We used two longitudinal person-level data sets on hospitalisations and entries to care to create annual measures for 131 English LAs, between 2006/2007 and 2013/2014 (April–March). We combined these measures by LA and financial year, along with other publicly available data on LA characteristics. We used linear mixed-effects models to analyse the relationship between the outcome—LA-specific rate of infant entry into care (per 10 000 infants in the LA population) — and LA-specific percentage of live births with maternal history of adversity-related hospital admissions (ie, substance misuse, mental health problems or violence-related admissions in the 3 years before delivery), adjusted for other predictors of entry into care. RESULTS: Rate of infant entry into care (mean: 85.16 per 10 000, SD: 41.07) and percentage of live births with maternal history of adversity-related hospital admissions (4.62%, 2.44%) varied greatly by LA. The prevalence of maternal adversity accounted for 24% of the variation in rate of entry (95% CI 14% to 35%). After adjustment, a percentage point increase in prevalence of maternal adversity—both within and between LAs—was associated with an estimated 2.56 (per 10 000) more infants entering care (1.31–3.82). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of maternal adversity before birth helped to explain the variation in LA rates of infant entry into care. Preventive interventions are needed to improve maternal well-being before and during pregnancy, and potentially reduce risk of child maltreatment and therefore entries to care. Evidence on who to target and data to evaluate change require linkage between parent–child healthcare data and administrative data from children’s social care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74304892020-08-24 Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study Pearson, Rachel Jane Jay, Matthew Alexander Wijlaars, Linda Petronella Martina Maria De Stavola, Bianca Syed, Shabeer Bedston, Stuart John Gilbert, Ruth BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: Infants enter care at varying rates across local authorities (LAs) in England, but evidence is lacking on what is driving these differences. With this ecological study, we aimed to explore the extent to which adversity indicated within women’s hospitalisation histories, predelivery, explained the rate of infant entry into care. METHODS: We used two longitudinal person-level data sets on hospitalisations and entries to care to create annual measures for 131 English LAs, between 2006/2007 and 2013/2014 (April–March). We combined these measures by LA and financial year, along with other publicly available data on LA characteristics. We used linear mixed-effects models to analyse the relationship between the outcome—LA-specific rate of infant entry into care (per 10 000 infants in the LA population) — and LA-specific percentage of live births with maternal history of adversity-related hospital admissions (ie, substance misuse, mental health problems or violence-related admissions in the 3 years before delivery), adjusted for other predictors of entry into care. RESULTS: Rate of infant entry into care (mean: 85.16 per 10 000, SD: 41.07) and percentage of live births with maternal history of adversity-related hospital admissions (4.62%, 2.44%) varied greatly by LA. The prevalence of maternal adversity accounted for 24% of the variation in rate of entry (95% CI 14% to 35%). After adjustment, a percentage point increase in prevalence of maternal adversity—both within and between LAs—was associated with an estimated 2.56 (per 10 000) more infants entering care (1.31–3.82). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of maternal adversity before birth helped to explain the variation in LA rates of infant entry into care. Preventive interventions are needed to improve maternal well-being before and during pregnancy, and potentially reduce risk of child maltreatment and therefore entries to care. Evidence on who to target and data to evaluate change require linkage between parent–child healthcare data and administrative data from children’s social care. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7430489/ /pubmed/32792438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036564 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Pearson, Rachel Jane
Jay, Matthew Alexander
Wijlaars, Linda Petronella Martina Maria
De Stavola, Bianca
Syed, Shabeer
Bedston, Stuart John
Gilbert, Ruth
Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study
title Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study
title_full Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study
title_fullStr Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study
title_full_unstemmed Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study
title_short Association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in England: a longitudinal ecological study
title_sort association between health indicators of maternal adversity and the rate of infant entry to local authority care in england: a longitudinal ecological study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036564
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonracheljane associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy
AT jaymatthewalexander associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy
AT wijlaarslindapetronellamartinamaria associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy
AT destavolabianca associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy
AT syedshabeer associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy
AT bedstonstuartjohn associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy
AT gilbertruth associationbetweenhealthindicatorsofmaternaladversityandtherateofinfantentrytolocalauthoritycareinenglandalongitudinalecologicalstudy