A Comparison of Three Methods of Height Estimation and Their Impact on Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in a Mixed Ethnicity Intensive Care Unit: A Real-World Experience

Background Height measurement is crucial for calculating predicted body weight (PBW) and establishing low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV). However, standing height is usually unavailable in critically ill patients and supine height may be difficult to obtain. Objective We investigated whether there were any significant differences in tidal volumes (VT) obtained using PBW derived from supine, forearm, and lower leg lengths in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Methods Supine, forearm and lower leg lengths were measured in 100 mechanically ventilated patients. Limb lengths were converted to height and PBW calculated using published formulae. The 6 mL/kg VT for the supine (sVT), forearm (fVT), and lower leg (lVT) methods were compared to each other and to visually estimated VT (estVT). Results Forearm length produced the greatest height estimate, leading to a significantly greater tidal volume fVT (437.6 ± 62.1 mL) compared with sVT (385.5 ± 63.8 mL) and lVT (369.1 ± 66.4 mL), (p < .001). There was no significant difference between lVT and sVT, (p = .169). On Bland Altman analysis, the lowest bias was found between lVT and sVT (−16.4 ± 36.0 mL, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) [−86.9, 54.1]), whereas fVT had a bias of 52.1 ± 41.5 mL, 95% LOA [−29.1, 133.4] compared to sVT. The fVT was significantly greater than sVT and lVT in all sexes and ethnic groups (p < .05). Conclusion Lower leg length may be a suitable alternative to supine height to facilitate the application of LTVV in an ICU setting.