Cargando…

Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates

Significant progress has already been made in development and testing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and Phase III clinical trials have begun for 6 novel vaccine candidates to date. These Phase III trials seek to demonstrate direct benefits of a vaccine on vaccine recipients. However, vaccination is also k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallagher, Molly E., Sieben, Andrew J., Nelson, Kristin N., Kraay, Alicia N. M., Lopman, Ben, Handel, Andreas, Koelle, Katia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.20170456
_version_ 1783571452059975680
author Gallagher, Molly E.
Sieben, Andrew J.
Nelson, Kristin N.
Kraay, Alicia N. M.
Lopman, Ben
Handel, Andreas
Koelle, Katia
author_facet Gallagher, Molly E.
Sieben, Andrew J.
Nelson, Kristin N.
Kraay, Alicia N. M.
Lopman, Ben
Handel, Andreas
Koelle, Katia
author_sort Gallagher, Molly E.
collection PubMed
description Significant progress has already been made in development and testing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and Phase III clinical trials have begun for 6 novel vaccine candidates to date. These Phase III trials seek to demonstrate direct benefits of a vaccine on vaccine recipients. However, vaccination is also known to bring about indirect benefits to a population through the reduction of virus circulation. The indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can play a key role in reducing case counts and COVID-19 deaths. To illustrate this point, we show through simulation that a vaccine with strong indirect effects has the potential to reduce SARS-CoV-2 circulation and COVID-19 deaths to a greater extent than an alternative vaccine with stronger direct effects but weaker indirect effects. Protection via indirect effects may be of particular importance in the context of this virus, because elderly individuals are at an elevated risk of death but are also less likely to be directly protected by vaccination due to immune senescence. We therefore encourage ongoing data collection and model development aimed at evaluating the indirect effects of forthcoming SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74306022020-08-18 Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates Gallagher, Molly E. Sieben, Andrew J. Nelson, Kristin N. Kraay, Alicia N. M. Lopman, Ben Handel, Andreas Koelle, Katia medRxiv Article Significant progress has already been made in development and testing of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and Phase III clinical trials have begun for 6 novel vaccine candidates to date. These Phase III trials seek to demonstrate direct benefits of a vaccine on vaccine recipients. However, vaccination is also known to bring about indirect benefits to a population through the reduction of virus circulation. The indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can play a key role in reducing case counts and COVID-19 deaths. To illustrate this point, we show through simulation that a vaccine with strong indirect effects has the potential to reduce SARS-CoV-2 circulation and COVID-19 deaths to a greater extent than an alternative vaccine with stronger direct effects but weaker indirect effects. Protection via indirect effects may be of particular importance in the context of this virus, because elderly individuals are at an elevated risk of death but are also less likely to be directly protected by vaccination due to immune senescence. We therefore encourage ongoing data collection and model development aimed at evaluating the indirect effects of forthcoming SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7430602/ /pubmed/32817958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.20170456 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gallagher, Molly E.
Sieben, Andrew J.
Nelson, Kristin N.
Kraay, Alicia N. M.
Lopman, Ben
Handel, Andreas
Koelle, Katia
Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
title Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
title_full Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
title_fullStr Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
title_full_unstemmed Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
title_short Considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
title_sort considering indirect benefits is critical when evaluating sars-cov-2 vaccine candidates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.20170456
work_keys_str_mv AT gallaghermollye consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates
AT siebenandrewj consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates
AT nelsonkristinn consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates
AT kraayalicianm consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates
AT lopmanben consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates
AT handelandreas consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates
AT koellekatia consideringindirectbenefitsiscriticalwhenevaluatingsarscov2vaccinecandidates