Cargando…
Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849955 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277 |
_version_ | 1783571494284034048 |
---|---|
author | Bou Akl, Imad Berro, Juliett Tfayli, Arafat Shamseddine, Ali Mukherji, Deborah Temraz, Sally El Cheikh, Jean Alameh, Ibrahim A. Assi, Hazem I. |
author_facet | Bou Akl, Imad Berro, Juliett Tfayli, Arafat Shamseddine, Ali Mukherji, Deborah Temraz, Sally El Cheikh, Jean Alameh, Ibrahim A. Assi, Hazem I. |
author_sort | Bou Akl, Imad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the overall response to treatment in patients with metastatic disease in relation to cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult metastatic cancer patients, treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors at American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary cancer center in Lebanon. Study enrollment began on January 1, 2014 and ended on January 12, 2016. Baseline demographics, epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the patients’ records. RESULTS: Our study consisted of 34 patients. Fifteen patients self-financed the treatment. The patients were prescribed immunotherapy without programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing as it was not part of the guidelines at the time. Twenty-two patients were treated with nivolumab and 12 patients with pembrolizumab. Thirteen patients showed partial response or stable disease, while 21 patients showed progression. CONCLUSION: Improvement in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival has been undercut by the lack of availability of these drugs and their cost. Considering that a large percentage of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, there is a need to use guidelines such as a preset PD-L1 level that ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent resource waste. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7430853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74308532020-08-25 Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience Bou Akl, Imad Berro, Juliett Tfayli, Arafat Shamseddine, Ali Mukherji, Deborah Temraz, Sally El Cheikh, Jean Alameh, Ibrahim A. Assi, Hazem I. World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the overall response to treatment in patients with metastatic disease in relation to cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult metastatic cancer patients, treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors at American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary cancer center in Lebanon. Study enrollment began on January 1, 2014 and ended on January 12, 2016. Baseline demographics, epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the patients’ records. RESULTS: Our study consisted of 34 patients. Fifteen patients self-financed the treatment. The patients were prescribed immunotherapy without programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing as it was not part of the guidelines at the time. Twenty-two patients were treated with nivolumab and 12 patients with pembrolizumab. Thirteen patients showed partial response or stable disease, while 21 patients showed progression. CONCLUSION: Improvement in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival has been undercut by the lack of availability of these drugs and their cost. Considering that a large percentage of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, there is a need to use guidelines such as a preset PD-L1 level that ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent resource waste. Elmer Press 2020-08 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7430853/ /pubmed/32849955 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277 Text en Copyright 2020, Bou Akl et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bou Akl, Imad Berro, Juliett Tfayli, Arafat Shamseddine, Ali Mukherji, Deborah Temraz, Sally El Cheikh, Jean Alameh, Ibrahim A. Assi, Hazem I. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience |
title | Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience |
title_full | Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience |
title_fullStr | Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience |
title_short | Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience |
title_sort | current status and future perspectives of immunotherapy in middle-income countries: a single-center early experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849955 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bouaklimad currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT berrojuliett currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT tfayliarafat currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT shamseddineali currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT mukherjideborah currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT temrazsally currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT elcheikhjean currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT alamehibrahima currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience AT assihazemi currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience |