Cargando…

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bou Akl, Imad, Berro, Juliett, Tfayli, Arafat, Shamseddine, Ali, Mukherji, Deborah, Temraz, Sally, El Cheikh, Jean, Alameh, Ibrahim A., Assi, Hazem I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849955
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277
_version_ 1783571494284034048
author Bou Akl, Imad
Berro, Juliett
Tfayli, Arafat
Shamseddine, Ali
Mukherji, Deborah
Temraz, Sally
El Cheikh, Jean
Alameh, Ibrahim A.
Assi, Hazem I.
author_facet Bou Akl, Imad
Berro, Juliett
Tfayli, Arafat
Shamseddine, Ali
Mukherji, Deborah
Temraz, Sally
El Cheikh, Jean
Alameh, Ibrahim A.
Assi, Hazem I.
author_sort Bou Akl, Imad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the overall response to treatment in patients with metastatic disease in relation to cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult metastatic cancer patients, treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors at American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary cancer center in Lebanon. Study enrollment began on January 1, 2014 and ended on January 12, 2016. Baseline demographics, epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the patients’ records. RESULTS: Our study consisted of 34 patients. Fifteen patients self-financed the treatment. The patients were prescribed immunotherapy without programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing as it was not part of the guidelines at the time. Twenty-two patients were treated with nivolumab and 12 patients with pembrolizumab. Thirteen patients showed partial response or stable disease, while 21 patients showed progression. CONCLUSION: Improvement in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival has been undercut by the lack of availability of these drugs and their cost. Considering that a large percentage of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, there is a need to use guidelines such as a preset PD-L1 level that ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent resource waste.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74308532020-08-25 Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience Bou Akl, Imad Berro, Juliett Tfayli, Arafat Shamseddine, Ali Mukherji, Deborah Temraz, Sally El Cheikh, Jean Alameh, Ibrahim A. Assi, Hazem I. World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the overall response to treatment in patients with metastatic disease in relation to cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult metastatic cancer patients, treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors at American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary cancer center in Lebanon. Study enrollment began on January 1, 2014 and ended on January 12, 2016. Baseline demographics, epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the patients’ records. RESULTS: Our study consisted of 34 patients. Fifteen patients self-financed the treatment. The patients were prescribed immunotherapy without programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing as it was not part of the guidelines at the time. Twenty-two patients were treated with nivolumab and 12 patients with pembrolizumab. Thirteen patients showed partial response or stable disease, while 21 patients showed progression. CONCLUSION: Improvement in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival has been undercut by the lack of availability of these drugs and their cost. Considering that a large percentage of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, there is a need to use guidelines such as a preset PD-L1 level that ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent resource waste. Elmer Press 2020-08 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7430853/ /pubmed/32849955 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277 Text en Copyright 2020, Bou Akl et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bou Akl, Imad
Berro, Juliett
Tfayli, Arafat
Shamseddine, Ali
Mukherji, Deborah
Temraz, Sally
El Cheikh, Jean
Alameh, Ibrahim A.
Assi, Hazem I.
Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
title Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
title_full Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
title_fullStr Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
title_full_unstemmed Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
title_short Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience
title_sort current status and future perspectives of immunotherapy in middle-income countries: a single-center early experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849955
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277
work_keys_str_mv AT bouaklimad currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT berrojuliett currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT tfayliarafat currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT shamseddineali currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT mukherjideborah currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT temrazsally currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT elcheikhjean currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT alamehibrahima currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience
AT assihazemi currentstatusandfutureperspectivesofimmunotherapyinmiddleincomecountriesasinglecenterearlyexperience