Cargando…
Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently and increasingly performed worldwide. Although catheters for coronary angiography are considered as single-use devices, some people still question this decision. This study evaluated the structural characteristics...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849970 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1134 |
_version_ | 1783571503988604928 |
---|---|
author | Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Bonfim, Flavia Vinhas, Maria Silva, Ivan Teixeira, Magno Galembeck, Andre |
author_facet | Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Bonfim, Flavia Vinhas, Maria Silva, Ivan Teixeira, Magno Galembeck, Andre |
author_sort | Oliveira, Dinaldo C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently and increasingly performed worldwide. Although catheters for coronary angiography are considered as single-use devices, some people still question this decision. This study evaluated the structural characteristics and thermal stability of new and reprocessed catheters. METHODS: Five catheters (Judkins left) of the same brand and manufacturer were selected for each analysis. We evaluated: new catheters, catheters reprocessed once (first), twice (second), thrice (third), and seven times (seventh). The optical analyses of the proximal, middle and distal parts of the catheters were performed by magnifying glass. Besides, thermogravimetric analyses were done. RESULTS: After reprocessing, the crushing, color changes, folds, dents, deformations, and lumen narrowing were observed; the stainless-steel framework, the external tortuosity, the interlaced mesh of stainless-steel wires and loss of polymeric material were visualized. Thermogravimetric analysis showed lost of mass of the catheters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the structural integrity and mass of catheters are lost with reprocessing. These findings may be caused by several steps of reprocessing; however, regardless of which step or steps were responsible, the presence of structural integrity loss leads to the recommendation of not reusing this type of device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7430894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74308942020-08-25 Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Bonfim, Flavia Vinhas, Maria Silva, Ivan Teixeira, Magno Galembeck, Andre Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently and increasingly performed worldwide. Although catheters for coronary angiography are considered as single-use devices, some people still question this decision. This study evaluated the structural characteristics and thermal stability of new and reprocessed catheters. METHODS: Five catheters (Judkins left) of the same brand and manufacturer were selected for each analysis. We evaluated: new catheters, catheters reprocessed once (first), twice (second), thrice (third), and seven times (seventh). The optical analyses of the proximal, middle and distal parts of the catheters were performed by magnifying glass. Besides, thermogravimetric analyses were done. RESULTS: After reprocessing, the crushing, color changes, folds, dents, deformations, and lumen narrowing were observed; the stainless-steel framework, the external tortuosity, the interlaced mesh of stainless-steel wires and loss of polymeric material were visualized. Thermogravimetric analysis showed lost of mass of the catheters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the structural integrity and mass of catheters are lost with reprocessing. These findings may be caused by several steps of reprocessing; however, regardless of which step or steps were responsible, the presence of structural integrity loss leads to the recommendation of not reusing this type of device. Elmer Press 2020-10 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7430894/ /pubmed/32849970 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1134 Text en Copyright 2020, Oliveira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Bonfim, Flavia Vinhas, Maria Silva, Ivan Teixeira, Magno Galembeck, Andre Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe |
title | Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe |
title_full | Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe |
title_fullStr | Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe |
title_full_unstemmed | Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe |
title_short | Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe |
title_sort | catheter reprocessing for coronary angiography: it is not safe |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849970 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliveiradinaldoc catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe AT bonfimflavia catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe AT vinhasmaria catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe AT silvaivan catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe AT teixeiramagno catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe AT galembeckandre catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe |