Cargando…

Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe

BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently and increasingly performed worldwide. Although catheters for coronary angiography are considered as single-use devices, some people still question this decision. This study evaluated the structural characteristics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Dinaldo C., Bonfim, Flavia, Vinhas, Maria, Silva, Ivan, Teixeira, Magno, Galembeck, Andre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849970
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1134
_version_ 1783571503988604928
author Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
Bonfim, Flavia
Vinhas, Maria
Silva, Ivan
Teixeira, Magno
Galembeck, Andre
author_facet Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
Bonfim, Flavia
Vinhas, Maria
Silva, Ivan
Teixeira, Magno
Galembeck, Andre
author_sort Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently and increasingly performed worldwide. Although catheters for coronary angiography are considered as single-use devices, some people still question this decision. This study evaluated the structural characteristics and thermal stability of new and reprocessed catheters. METHODS: Five catheters (Judkins left) of the same brand and manufacturer were selected for each analysis. We evaluated: new catheters, catheters reprocessed once (first), twice (second), thrice (third), and seven times (seventh). The optical analyses of the proximal, middle and distal parts of the catheters were performed by magnifying glass. Besides, thermogravimetric analyses were done. RESULTS: After reprocessing, the crushing, color changes, folds, dents, deformations, and lumen narrowing were observed; the stainless-steel framework, the external tortuosity, the interlaced mesh of stainless-steel wires and loss of polymeric material were visualized. Thermogravimetric analysis showed lost of mass of the catheters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the structural integrity and mass of catheters are lost with reprocessing. These findings may be caused by several steps of reprocessing; however, regardless of which step or steps were responsible, the presence of structural integrity loss leads to the recommendation of not reusing this type of device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74308942020-08-25 Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Bonfim, Flavia Vinhas, Maria Silva, Ivan Teixeira, Magno Galembeck, Andre Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently and increasingly performed worldwide. Although catheters for coronary angiography are considered as single-use devices, some people still question this decision. This study evaluated the structural characteristics and thermal stability of new and reprocessed catheters. METHODS: Five catheters (Judkins left) of the same brand and manufacturer were selected for each analysis. We evaluated: new catheters, catheters reprocessed once (first), twice (second), thrice (third), and seven times (seventh). The optical analyses of the proximal, middle and distal parts of the catheters were performed by magnifying glass. Besides, thermogravimetric analyses were done. RESULTS: After reprocessing, the crushing, color changes, folds, dents, deformations, and lumen narrowing were observed; the stainless-steel framework, the external tortuosity, the interlaced mesh of stainless-steel wires and loss of polymeric material were visualized. Thermogravimetric analysis showed lost of mass of the catheters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the structural integrity and mass of catheters are lost with reprocessing. These findings may be caused by several steps of reprocessing; however, regardless of which step or steps were responsible, the presence of structural integrity loss leads to the recommendation of not reusing this type of device. Elmer Press 2020-10 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7430894/ /pubmed/32849970 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1134 Text en Copyright 2020, Oliveira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
Bonfim, Flavia
Vinhas, Maria
Silva, Ivan
Teixeira, Magno
Galembeck, Andre
Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
title Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
title_full Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
title_fullStr Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
title_full_unstemmed Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
title_short Catheter Reprocessing for Coronary Angiography: It is Not Safe
title_sort catheter reprocessing for coronary angiography: it is not safe
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849970
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1134
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiradinaldoc catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe
AT bonfimflavia catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe
AT vinhasmaria catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe
AT silvaivan catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe
AT teixeiramagno catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe
AT galembeckandre catheterreprocessingforcoronaryangiographyitisnotsafe