Cargando…
Objecting to experiments even while approving of the policies or treatments they compare
We resolve a controversy over two competing hypotheses about why people object to randomized experiments: 1) People unsurprisingly object to experiments only when they object to a policy or treatment the experiment contains, or 2) people can paradoxically object to experiments even when they approve...
Autores principales: | Heck, Patrick R., Chabris, Christopher F., Watts, Duncan J., Meyer, Michelle N. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009030117 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Objecting to experiments that compare two unobjectionable policies or treatments
por: Meyer, Michelle N., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
An illusion of predictability in scientific results: Even experts confuse inferential uncertainty and outcome variability
por: Zhang, Sam, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Even lawyers do not like legalese
por: Martínez, Eric, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016
por: Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Greed communication predicts the approval and reach of US senators’ tweets
por: Mercadante, Eric J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)