Cargando…

Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety

This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (56-week treatment; 24-week follow-up) assessed tanezumab in patients with chronic low back pain and history of inadequate response to standard-of-care analgesics (NCT02528253). Patients received placebo, subcutaneous tanezumab (5 or 10 mg every 8 weeks),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markman, John D., Bolash, Robert B., McAlindon, Timothy E., Kivitz, Alan J., Pombo-Suarez, Manuel, Ohtori, Seiji, Roemer, Frank W., Li, David J., Viktrup, Lars, Bramson, Candace, West, Christine R., Verburg, Kenneth M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001928
_version_ 1783571536498655232
author Markman, John D.
Bolash, Robert B.
McAlindon, Timothy E.
Kivitz, Alan J.
Pombo-Suarez, Manuel
Ohtori, Seiji
Roemer, Frank W.
Li, David J.
Viktrup, Lars
Bramson, Candace
West, Christine R.
Verburg, Kenneth M.
author_facet Markman, John D.
Bolash, Robert B.
McAlindon, Timothy E.
Kivitz, Alan J.
Pombo-Suarez, Manuel
Ohtori, Seiji
Roemer, Frank W.
Li, David J.
Viktrup, Lars
Bramson, Candace
West, Christine R.
Verburg, Kenneth M.
author_sort Markman, John D.
collection PubMed
description This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (56-week treatment; 24-week follow-up) assessed tanezumab in patients with chronic low back pain and history of inadequate response to standard-of-care analgesics (NCT02528253). Patients received placebo, subcutaneous tanezumab (5 or 10 mg every 8 weeks), or oral tramadol prolonged-release (100-300 mg/day). Primary endpoint was change in low back pain intensity (LBPI) at week 16 for tanezumab vs placebo. Key secondary endpoints were proportion of patients with ≥50% decrease in LBPI at week 16, change in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at week 16, and change in LBPI at week 2 for tanezumab vs placebo. Adverse events and joint safety were assessed through weeks 56 and 80, respectively. Tanezumab 10 mg met the primary endpoint by significantly improving LBPI at week 16 vs placebo; least squares (LS) mean (95% CI) difference = −0.40 (−0.76 to −0.04; P = 0.0281). Tanezumab 10 mg significantly improved all key secondary endpoints. Tanezumab 5 mg did not meet the primary endpoint (LS mean [95% CI] treatment difference vs placebo = −0.30 [−0.66 to 0.07; P = 0.1117]), preventing formal testing of key secondary endpoints for this dose. The proportion of patients with ≥50% improvement in LBPI at week 16 was 37.4% in the placebo group, 43.3% in the tanezumab 5 mg group (Odds ratio [95% CI] vs placebo = 1.28 [0.97 to 1.70; P = 0.0846]), and 46.3% in the tanezumab 10 mg group (Odds ratio [95% CI] vs placebo = 1.45 [1.09 to 1.91; P = 0.0101]). Prespecified joint safety events were more frequent with tanezumab 10 mg (2.6%) than tanezumab 5 mg (1.0%), tramadol (0.2%), or placebo (0%). Seven patients, all in the tanezumab 10 mg group (1.4%), underwent total joint replacement. In conclusion, tanezumab 10 mg significantly improved pain and function vs placebo in patients with difficult-to-treat chronic low back pain. Tanezumab was associated with a low rate of joint safety events, some requiring joint replacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74311402020-09-04 Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety Markman, John D. Bolash, Robert B. McAlindon, Timothy E. Kivitz, Alan J. Pombo-Suarez, Manuel Ohtori, Seiji Roemer, Frank W. Li, David J. Viktrup, Lars Bramson, Candace West, Christine R. Verburg, Kenneth M. Pain Research Paper This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (56-week treatment; 24-week follow-up) assessed tanezumab in patients with chronic low back pain and history of inadequate response to standard-of-care analgesics (NCT02528253). Patients received placebo, subcutaneous tanezumab (5 or 10 mg every 8 weeks), or oral tramadol prolonged-release (100-300 mg/day). Primary endpoint was change in low back pain intensity (LBPI) at week 16 for tanezumab vs placebo. Key secondary endpoints were proportion of patients with ≥50% decrease in LBPI at week 16, change in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at week 16, and change in LBPI at week 2 for tanezumab vs placebo. Adverse events and joint safety were assessed through weeks 56 and 80, respectively. Tanezumab 10 mg met the primary endpoint by significantly improving LBPI at week 16 vs placebo; least squares (LS) mean (95% CI) difference = −0.40 (−0.76 to −0.04; P = 0.0281). Tanezumab 10 mg significantly improved all key secondary endpoints. Tanezumab 5 mg did not meet the primary endpoint (LS mean [95% CI] treatment difference vs placebo = −0.30 [−0.66 to 0.07; P = 0.1117]), preventing formal testing of key secondary endpoints for this dose. The proportion of patients with ≥50% improvement in LBPI at week 16 was 37.4% in the placebo group, 43.3% in the tanezumab 5 mg group (Odds ratio [95% CI] vs placebo = 1.28 [0.97 to 1.70; P = 0.0846]), and 46.3% in the tanezumab 10 mg group (Odds ratio [95% CI] vs placebo = 1.45 [1.09 to 1.91; P = 0.0101]). Prespecified joint safety events were more frequent with tanezumab 10 mg (2.6%) than tanezumab 5 mg (1.0%), tramadol (0.2%), or placebo (0%). Seven patients, all in the tanezumab 10 mg group (1.4%), underwent total joint replacement. In conclusion, tanezumab 10 mg significantly improved pain and function vs placebo in patients with difficult-to-treat chronic low back pain. Tanezumab was associated with a low rate of joint safety events, some requiring joint replacement. Wolters Kluwer 2020-09 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7431140/ /pubmed/32453139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001928 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Markman, John D.
Bolash, Robert B.
McAlindon, Timothy E.
Kivitz, Alan J.
Pombo-Suarez, Manuel
Ohtori, Seiji
Roemer, Frank W.
Li, David J.
Viktrup, Lars
Bramson, Candace
West, Christine R.
Verburg, Kenneth M.
Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
title Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
title_full Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
title_fullStr Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
title_full_unstemmed Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
title_short Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
title_sort tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001928
work_keys_str_mv AT markmanjohnd tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT bolashrobertb tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT mcalindontimothye tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT kivitzalanj tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT pombosuarezmanuel tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT ohtoriseiji tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT roemerfrankw tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT lidavidj tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT viktruplars tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT bramsoncandace tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT westchristiner tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety
AT verburgkennethm tanezumabforchroniclowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindplaceboandactivecontrolledphase3studyofefficacyandsafety