Cargando…

Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of a Mayo Scissor as a suburethral spacer compared with a Babcock clamp holding a loop of tape under the urethra results in different rates of abnormal bladder outcomes 12 months after retropubic midurethral sling surgery. METHODS: The MUST (Mid-Urethral Sling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brennand, Erin A., Wu, Guosong, Houlihan, Sara, Globerman, Dobrochna, Gagnon, Louise-Helene, Birch, Colin, Hyakutake, Momoe, Carlson, Kevin V., Al-Shankiti, Hanan, Robert, Magali, Lazare, Darren, Kim-Fine, Shunaha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004027
_version_ 1783571538149113856
author Brennand, Erin A.
Wu, Guosong
Houlihan, Sara
Globerman, Dobrochna
Gagnon, Louise-Helene
Birch, Colin
Hyakutake, Momoe
Carlson, Kevin V.
Al-Shankiti, Hanan
Robert, Magali
Lazare, Darren
Kim-Fine, Shunaha
author_facet Brennand, Erin A.
Wu, Guosong
Houlihan, Sara
Globerman, Dobrochna
Gagnon, Louise-Helene
Birch, Colin
Hyakutake, Momoe
Carlson, Kevin V.
Al-Shankiti, Hanan
Robert, Magali
Lazare, Darren
Kim-Fine, Shunaha
author_sort Brennand, Erin A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of a Mayo Scissor as a suburethral spacer compared with a Babcock clamp holding a loop of tape under the urethra results in different rates of abnormal bladder outcomes 12 months after retropubic midurethral sling surgery. METHODS: The MUST (Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning) trial was a block-randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial that allocated women to have their retropubic midurethral slings tensioned by Scissor or Babcock technique. The primary outcome (abnormal bladder) was a composite of persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder, and urinary retention. Secondary outcomes included outcomes of the composite, postoperative catheterization, incontinence-related questionnaires, repeat incontinence treatment, and uroflowmetry. Sample size of 159 in each arm (N=318) was planned for a superiority trial, hypothesizing a 10% difference in primary outcome. RESULTS: From September 2015 to December 2017, 506 women were screened and 318 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar in each arm. At 12 months, 253 (79.6%) women provided information on primary outcome: 40 of 128 (31.3%) patients with midurethral slings tensioned by Scissor experienced abnormal bladder, compared with 23 of 125 (18.4%) of those with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock (P=.018, relative difference 12.9%). Secondary analyses favored Babcock for median duration of catheterization and the proportions of women experiencing urinary retention requiring sling lysis. Uroflowmetry parameters suggest the Scissor technique is more restrictive. Rates of mesh erosion were lower for the Scissor arm. No differences occurred in proportions of women experiencing patient reported persistent SUI after surgery. CONCLUSION: Abnormal bladder outcomes were 12.9% less frequent for women with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock. Both techniques provided a comparable patient reported cure for SUI at 12 months. Women with midurethral slings tensioned by Scissors experienced more intervention for obstruction, whereas those with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock experienced higher rates of mesh erosion. This information about how the postoperative courses differ allows surgeons to better counsel patients preoperatively or tailor their choice of technique. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480231. FUNDING SOURCE: Boston Scientific.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74311542020-09-04 Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial Brennand, Erin A. Wu, Guosong Houlihan, Sara Globerman, Dobrochna Gagnon, Louise-Helene Birch, Colin Hyakutake, Momoe Carlson, Kevin V. Al-Shankiti, Hanan Robert, Magali Lazare, Darren Kim-Fine, Shunaha Obstet Gynecol Contents OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of a Mayo Scissor as a suburethral spacer compared with a Babcock clamp holding a loop of tape under the urethra results in different rates of abnormal bladder outcomes 12 months after retropubic midurethral sling surgery. METHODS: The MUST (Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning) trial was a block-randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial that allocated women to have their retropubic midurethral slings tensioned by Scissor or Babcock technique. The primary outcome (abnormal bladder) was a composite of persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder, and urinary retention. Secondary outcomes included outcomes of the composite, postoperative catheterization, incontinence-related questionnaires, repeat incontinence treatment, and uroflowmetry. Sample size of 159 in each arm (N=318) was planned for a superiority trial, hypothesizing a 10% difference in primary outcome. RESULTS: From September 2015 to December 2017, 506 women were screened and 318 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar in each arm. At 12 months, 253 (79.6%) women provided information on primary outcome: 40 of 128 (31.3%) patients with midurethral slings tensioned by Scissor experienced abnormal bladder, compared with 23 of 125 (18.4%) of those with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock (P=.018, relative difference 12.9%). Secondary analyses favored Babcock for median duration of catheterization and the proportions of women experiencing urinary retention requiring sling lysis. Uroflowmetry parameters suggest the Scissor technique is more restrictive. Rates of mesh erosion were lower for the Scissor arm. No differences occurred in proportions of women experiencing patient reported persistent SUI after surgery. CONCLUSION: Abnormal bladder outcomes were 12.9% less frequent for women with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock. Both techniques provided a comparable patient reported cure for SUI at 12 months. Women with midurethral slings tensioned by Scissors experienced more intervention for obstruction, whereas those with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock experienced higher rates of mesh erosion. This information about how the postoperative courses differ allows surgeons to better counsel patients preoperatively or tailor their choice of technique. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480231. FUNDING SOURCE: Boston Scientific. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7431154/ /pubmed/32769657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004027 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Contents
Brennand, Erin A.
Wu, Guosong
Houlihan, Sara
Globerman, Dobrochna
Gagnon, Louise-Helene
Birch, Colin
Hyakutake, Momoe
Carlson, Kevin V.
Al-Shankiti, Hanan
Robert, Magali
Lazare, Darren
Kim-Fine, Shunaha
Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort two intraoperative techniques for midurethral sling tensioning: a randomized controlled trial
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004027
work_keys_str_mv AT brennanderina twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuguosong twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT houlihansara twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT globermandobrochna twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gagnonlouisehelene twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT birchcolin twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hyakutakemomoe twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT carlsonkevinv twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alshankitihanan twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT robertmagali twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lazaredarren twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimfineshunaha twointraoperativetechniquesformidurethralslingtensioningarandomizedcontrolledtrial