Factors Related to Subjective Well-being in Workers Who Interact with Angry Clients

BACKGROUND: Among workers who interact with angry clients, there is limited information about the characteristics of workers who are most vulnerable to mental health problems. Thus, we determined the association of multiple demographic, socioeconomic, and modifiable work-related psychosocial factors with the subjective well-being of workers who interact with angry clients. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from the fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey, conducted in 2017. The study focused on workers who interacted with angry clients during 25% or more of their work time. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of multiple factors with self-reported subjective well-being after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, and modifiable psychosocial factors. RESULTS: Overall, 9.6% of men and 7.4% of women who interacted with angry clients reported poor subjective well-being. Poor well-being was significantly more likely to be reported by men who worked 40 hours or more per week (aOR, 3.97–5.37) and by men who were daily workers (aOR, 2.21). Poor subjective well-being had a significantly positive association with exposure to adverse social behaviors by clients (men: aOR, 1.54, women: aOR, 1.58), and significantly negative associations with unskilled manual work (women only: aOR, 0.30), job satisfaction (men: aOR, 0.70, women: aOR, 0.52), and good social climate (men: aOR, 0.70, women: aOR, 0.44). CONCLUSION: Workers who interact with angry clients were widely distributed over non-manual labor and manual labor, but not limited to service and sales job. We identified modifiable factors that affect the subjective well-being of workers who interact with angry clients. We suggest that employers provide protection to prevent adverse social behaviors by clients, and also make an effort to establish a good social climate at the workplace.