Cargando…

Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study

PURPOSE: The hospital accreditation system in Iran is relatively young, having been introduced in 2012. Therefore, there is a real need for research on the status and impact of hospital accreditation in Iran. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare attitudes towards accreditation and q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakemam, Edris, Rajabi, Mohammad Reza, Raeissi, Pouran, Ehlers, Lars Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884279
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S263811
_version_ 1783571582721982464
author Kakemam, Edris
Rajabi, Mohammad Reza
Raeissi, Pouran
Ehlers, Lars Holger
author_facet Kakemam, Edris
Rajabi, Mohammad Reza
Raeissi, Pouran
Ehlers, Lars Holger
author_sort Kakemam, Edris
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The hospital accreditation system in Iran is relatively young, having been introduced in 2012. Therefore, there is a real need for research on the status and impact of hospital accreditation in Iran. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare attitudes towards accreditation and quality improvement activities among hospital employees, specifically the attitudes towards the impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare and its benefits in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out at 23 teaching hospitals in three metropolises in Iran, all of which successfully passed national accreditation surveys. Some 1213 hospital managers, administrative staff, nurses, and para-clinical staff participated in the survey. The main outcome measures were quality results, and the activities related to quality improvement include senior managers' commitment and support, strategic quality planning, education and training, rewards and recognition, quality management, use of data, the involvement of professionals in accreditation, and accreditation benefits. The questionnaire was applied using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean values between respondent groups. RESULTS: Among nurses and managers, there was low support for accreditation and even less among para-clinical staff who fail to see accreditation having a positive impact on healthcare quality. Also, nurses' attitudes toward the accreditation benefits were more positive compared with the two other groups. Staff stated that the main reasons for low support were a lack of education and training to act upon the accreditation survey results and a lack of management visibility and support for quality improvement. CONCLUSION: Improving quality through means of hospital accreditation is a complex process with high demands for management and employees. Questionnaires on employees’ attitudes and perceptions of the impact of accreditation and quality improvement-related activities in the hospitals can provide valuable information on the current problems of a hospital accreditation program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74314512020-09-02 Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study Kakemam, Edris Rajabi, Mohammad Reza Raeissi, Pouran Ehlers, Lars Holger J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: The hospital accreditation system in Iran is relatively young, having been introduced in 2012. Therefore, there is a real need for research on the status and impact of hospital accreditation in Iran. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare attitudes towards accreditation and quality improvement activities among hospital employees, specifically the attitudes towards the impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare and its benefits in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out at 23 teaching hospitals in three metropolises in Iran, all of which successfully passed national accreditation surveys. Some 1213 hospital managers, administrative staff, nurses, and para-clinical staff participated in the survey. The main outcome measures were quality results, and the activities related to quality improvement include senior managers' commitment and support, strategic quality planning, education and training, rewards and recognition, quality management, use of data, the involvement of professionals in accreditation, and accreditation benefits. The questionnaire was applied using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean values between respondent groups. RESULTS: Among nurses and managers, there was low support for accreditation and even less among para-clinical staff who fail to see accreditation having a positive impact on healthcare quality. Also, nurses' attitudes toward the accreditation benefits were more positive compared with the two other groups. Staff stated that the main reasons for low support were a lack of education and training to act upon the accreditation survey results and a lack of management visibility and support for quality improvement. CONCLUSION: Improving quality through means of hospital accreditation is a complex process with high demands for management and employees. Questionnaires on employees’ attitudes and perceptions of the impact of accreditation and quality improvement-related activities in the hospitals can provide valuable information on the current problems of a hospital accreditation program. Dove 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7431451/ /pubmed/32884279 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S263811 Text en © 2020 Kakemam et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kakemam, Edris
Rajabi, Mohammad Reza
Raeissi, Pouran
Ehlers, Lars Holger
Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study
title Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study
title_full Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study
title_fullStr Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study
title_short Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study
title_sort attitudes towards accreditation and quality improvement activities among hospital employees in iran: a quantitative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884279
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S263811
work_keys_str_mv AT kakemamedris attitudestowardsaccreditationandqualityimprovementactivitiesamonghospitalemployeesiniranaquantitativestudy
AT rajabimohammadreza attitudestowardsaccreditationandqualityimprovementactivitiesamonghospitalemployeesiniranaquantitativestudy
AT raeissipouran attitudestowardsaccreditationandqualityimprovementactivitiesamonghospitalemployeesiniranaquantitativestudy
AT ehlerslarsholger attitudestowardsaccreditationandqualityimprovementactivitiesamonghospitalemployeesiniranaquantitativestudy