Cargando…

Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review

BACKGROUND: In August 2017, the European Commission awarded the “European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference levels for X-ray Medical Imaging” project to the European Society of Radiology, to provide up-to-date Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications. The aim of this work was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulo, Graciano, Damilakis, John, Tsapaki, Virginia, Schegerer, Alexander A., Repussard, Jacques, Jaschke, Werner, Frija, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y
_version_ 1783571588805820416
author Paulo, Graciano
Damilakis, John
Tsapaki, Virginia
Schegerer, Alexander A.
Repussard, Jacques
Jaschke, Werner
Frija, Guy
author_facet Paulo, Graciano
Damilakis, John
Tsapaki, Virginia
Schegerer, Alexander A.
Repussard, Jacques
Jaschke, Werner
Frija, Guy
author_sort Paulo, Graciano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In August 2017, the European Commission awarded the “European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference levels for X-ray Medical Imaging” project to the European Society of Radiology, to provide up-to-date Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications. The aim of this work was to conduct an extensive literature review by analysing the most recent studies published and the data provided by the National Competent Authorities, to understand the current situation regarding Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for computed tomography. RESULTS: The literature review has identified 23 papers with Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for computed tomography from 15 countries; 12 of them from Europe. A total of 28 clinical indications for 6 anatomical areas (head, cervical spine/neck, chest, abdomen, abdomen-pelvis, chest-abdomen-pelvis) have been identified. CONCLUSIONS: In all the six anatomical areas for which Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications were found, a huge variation of computed tomography dose descriptor values was identified, providing evidence for a need to develop strategies to standardise and optimise computed tomography protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74314772020-08-20 Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review Paulo, Graciano Damilakis, John Tsapaki, Virginia Schegerer, Alexander A. Repussard, Jacques Jaschke, Werner Frija, Guy Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: In August 2017, the European Commission awarded the “European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference levels for X-ray Medical Imaging” project to the European Society of Radiology, to provide up-to-date Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications. The aim of this work was to conduct an extensive literature review by analysing the most recent studies published and the data provided by the National Competent Authorities, to understand the current situation regarding Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for computed tomography. RESULTS: The literature review has identified 23 papers with Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for computed tomography from 15 countries; 12 of them from Europe. A total of 28 clinical indications for 6 anatomical areas (head, cervical spine/neck, chest, abdomen, abdomen-pelvis, chest-abdomen-pelvis) have been identified. CONCLUSIONS: In all the six anatomical areas for which Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications were found, a huge variation of computed tomography dose descriptor values was identified, providing evidence for a need to develop strategies to standardise and optimise computed tomography protocols. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7431477/ /pubmed/32804275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paulo, Graciano
Damilakis, John
Tsapaki, Virginia
Schegerer, Alexander A.
Repussard, Jacques
Jaschke, Werner
Frija, Guy
Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
title Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
title_full Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
title_fullStr Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
title_short Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
title_sort diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y
work_keys_str_mv AT paulograciano diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT damilakisjohn diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT tsapakivirginia diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT schegereralexandera diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT repussardjacques diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT jaschkewerner diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT frijaguy diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview
AT diagnosticreferencelevelsbasedonclinicalindicationsincomputedtomographyaliteraturereview