Cargando…

Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation

AIMS: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and without revascularisation options. Previous studies have shown that SCS improves the quality of life in this patient group and reduces the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vervaat, F. E., van der Gaag, A., van Suijlekom, H., Botman, C. J., Teeuwen, K., Wijnbergen, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0
_version_ 1783571590047334400
author Vervaat, F. E.
van der Gaag, A.
van Suijlekom, H.
Botman, C. J.
Teeuwen, K.
Wijnbergen, I.
author_facet Vervaat, F. E.
van der Gaag, A.
van Suijlekom, H.
Botman, C. J.
Teeuwen, K.
Wijnbergen, I.
author_sort Vervaat, F. E.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and without revascularisation options. Previous studies have shown that SCS improves the quality of life in this patient group and reduces the severity of the angina pectoris. The aim of this prospective, single-arm observational study is to show this effect in a single-centre cohort using a multidisciplinary team approach to the selection process, with a follow-up period of 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2010 and March 2017, 87 patients with RAP referred to our centre received SCS. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) were completed at baseline, prior to implantation, and 1 year post-implantation. After 1 year of follow-up there was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of angina pectoris attacks from more than 4 times a day to 1–2 times a week (p < 0.001). The SAQ showed statistically significant improvement in four of the five dimensions: physical limitation (p < 0.001), angina frequency (p < 0.001), angina stability (p < 0.001) and quality of life (p < 0.001). The RAND-36 showed statistically significant improvement in all nine dimensions: physical functioning (p = 0.001), role/physical (p < 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.03), role/emotional (p < 0.05), bodily pain (p < 0.001), general health (p < 0.001), vitality (p < 0.001), mental health (p = 0.02) and health change (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of angina pectoris severity after 1 year of follow-up in patients treated with SCS for RAP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74314822020-08-20 Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation Vervaat, F. E. van der Gaag, A. van Suijlekom, H. Botman, C. J. Teeuwen, K. Wijnbergen, I. Neth Heart J Original Article AIMS: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and without revascularisation options. Previous studies have shown that SCS improves the quality of life in this patient group and reduces the severity of the angina pectoris. The aim of this prospective, single-arm observational study is to show this effect in a single-centre cohort using a multidisciplinary team approach to the selection process, with a follow-up period of 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2010 and March 2017, 87 patients with RAP referred to our centre received SCS. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) were completed at baseline, prior to implantation, and 1 year post-implantation. After 1 year of follow-up there was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of angina pectoris attacks from more than 4 times a day to 1–2 times a week (p < 0.001). The SAQ showed statistically significant improvement in four of the five dimensions: physical limitation (p < 0.001), angina frequency (p < 0.001), angina stability (p < 0.001) and quality of life (p < 0.001). The RAND-36 showed statistically significant improvement in all nine dimensions: physical functioning (p = 0.001), role/physical (p < 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.03), role/emotional (p < 0.05), bodily pain (p < 0.001), general health (p < 0.001), vitality (p < 0.001), mental health (p = 0.02) and health change (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of angina pectoris severity after 1 year of follow-up in patients treated with SCS for RAP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-05-19 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7431482/ /pubmed/32430654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vervaat, F. E.
van der Gaag, A.
van Suijlekom, H.
Botman, C. J.
Teeuwen, K.
Wijnbergen, I.
Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
title Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
title_full Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
title_fullStr Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
title_short Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
title_sort improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vervaatfe improvementinqualityoflifeandanginapectoris1yearfollowupofpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisandspinalcordstimulation
AT vandergaaga improvementinqualityoflifeandanginapectoris1yearfollowupofpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisandspinalcordstimulation
AT vansuijlekomh improvementinqualityoflifeandanginapectoris1yearfollowupofpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisandspinalcordstimulation
AT botmancj improvementinqualityoflifeandanginapectoris1yearfollowupofpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisandspinalcordstimulation
AT teeuwenk improvementinqualityoflifeandanginapectoris1yearfollowupofpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisandspinalcordstimulation
AT wijnbergeni improvementinqualityoflifeandanginapectoris1yearfollowupofpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisandspinalcordstimulation