Cargando…

Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas

Introduction: For patients with localized node-negative (Stage I and II) clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), current clinicopathological staging has limited predictive capability because of their low risk. Analyzing molecular signatures at the time of nephrectomy can aid in understanding futur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shih, Andrew J., Murphy, Neal, Kozel, Zachary, Shah, Paras, Yaskiv, Oksana, Khalili, Houman, Liew, Anthony, Kavoussi, Louis, Hall, Simon, Vira, Manish, Zhu, Xin-Hua, Lee, Annette T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01383
_version_ 1783571597334937600
author Shih, Andrew J.
Murphy, Neal
Kozel, Zachary
Shah, Paras
Yaskiv, Oksana
Khalili, Houman
Liew, Anthony
Kavoussi, Louis
Hall, Simon
Vira, Manish
Zhu, Xin-Hua
Lee, Annette T.
author_facet Shih, Andrew J.
Murphy, Neal
Kozel, Zachary
Shah, Paras
Yaskiv, Oksana
Khalili, Houman
Liew, Anthony
Kavoussi, Louis
Hall, Simon
Vira, Manish
Zhu, Xin-Hua
Lee, Annette T.
author_sort Shih, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: For patients with localized node-negative (Stage I and II) clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), current clinicopathological staging has limited predictive capability because of their low risk. Analyzing molecular signatures at the time of nephrectomy can aid in understanding future metastatic potential. Objective: Develop a molecular signature that can stratify patients who have clinically low risk ccRCC, but have high risk genetic changes driving an aggressive metastatic phenotype. Patients, Materials, and Methods: Presented is the differential expression of mRNA and miRNA in 44 Stage I and Stage II patients, 21 who developed metastasis within 5 years of nephrectomy, compared to 23 patients who remained disease free for more than 5 years. Extracted RNA from nephrectomy specimens preserved in FFPE blocks was sequenced using RNAseq. MiRNA expression was performed using the TaqMan OpenArray qPCR protocol. Results: One hundred thirty one genes and 2 miRNA were differentially expressed between the two groups. Canonical correlation (CC) analysis was applied and four CCs (CC32, CC20, CC9, and CC7) have an AUC > 0.65 in our dataset with similar predictive power in the TCGA-KIRC dataset. Gene set enrichment showed CC9 as kidney development/adhesion, CC20 as oxidative phosphorylation pathway, CC32 as RNA binding/spindle and CC7 as immune response. In a multivariate Cox model, the four CCs were able to identify high/low risk groups for metastases in the TCGA-KIRC (p < 0.05) with odds ratios of CC32 = 5.7, CC20 = 4.4, CC9 = 3.6, and CC7 = 2.7. Conclusion: These results identify molecular signatures for more aggressive tumors in clinically low risk ccRCC patients who have a higher potential of metastasis than would be expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74315182020-08-25 Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas Shih, Andrew J. Murphy, Neal Kozel, Zachary Shah, Paras Yaskiv, Oksana Khalili, Houman Liew, Anthony Kavoussi, Louis Hall, Simon Vira, Manish Zhu, Xin-Hua Lee, Annette T. Front Oncol Oncology Introduction: For patients with localized node-negative (Stage I and II) clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), current clinicopathological staging has limited predictive capability because of their low risk. Analyzing molecular signatures at the time of nephrectomy can aid in understanding future metastatic potential. Objective: Develop a molecular signature that can stratify patients who have clinically low risk ccRCC, but have high risk genetic changes driving an aggressive metastatic phenotype. Patients, Materials, and Methods: Presented is the differential expression of mRNA and miRNA in 44 Stage I and Stage II patients, 21 who developed metastasis within 5 years of nephrectomy, compared to 23 patients who remained disease free for more than 5 years. Extracted RNA from nephrectomy specimens preserved in FFPE blocks was sequenced using RNAseq. MiRNA expression was performed using the TaqMan OpenArray qPCR protocol. Results: One hundred thirty one genes and 2 miRNA were differentially expressed between the two groups. Canonical correlation (CC) analysis was applied and four CCs (CC32, CC20, CC9, and CC7) have an AUC > 0.65 in our dataset with similar predictive power in the TCGA-KIRC dataset. Gene set enrichment showed CC9 as kidney development/adhesion, CC20 as oxidative phosphorylation pathway, CC32 as RNA binding/spindle and CC7 as immune response. In a multivariate Cox model, the four CCs were able to identify high/low risk groups for metastases in the TCGA-KIRC (p < 0.05) with odds ratios of CC32 = 5.7, CC20 = 4.4, CC9 = 3.6, and CC7 = 2.7. Conclusion: These results identify molecular signatures for more aggressive tumors in clinically low risk ccRCC patients who have a higher potential of metastasis than would be expected. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7431518/ /pubmed/32850445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01383 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shih, Murphy, Kozel, Shah, Yaskiv, Khalili, Liew, Kavoussi, Hall, Vira, Zhu and Lee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Shih, Andrew J.
Murphy, Neal
Kozel, Zachary
Shah, Paras
Yaskiv, Oksana
Khalili, Houman
Liew, Anthony
Kavoussi, Louis
Hall, Simon
Vira, Manish
Zhu, Xin-Hua
Lee, Annette T.
Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas
title Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas
title_full Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas
title_fullStr Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas
title_short Prognostic Molecular Signatures for Metastatic Potential in Clinically Low-Risk Stage I and II Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas
title_sort prognostic molecular signatures for metastatic potential in clinically low-risk stage i and ii clear cell renal cell carcinomas
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01383
work_keys_str_mv AT shihandrewj prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT murphyneal prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT kozelzachary prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT shahparas prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT yaskivoksana prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT khalilihouman prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT liewanthony prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT kavoussilouis prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT hallsimon prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT viramanish prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT zhuxinhua prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas
AT leeannettet prognosticmolecularsignaturesformetastaticpotentialinclinicallylowriskstageiandiiclearcellrenalcellcarcinomas