Cargando…
Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game
Predicting and modeling human behavior and finding trends within human decision-making processes is a major problem of social science. Rock Paper Scissors (RPS) is the fundamental strategic question in many game theory problems and real-world competitions. Finding the right approach to beat a partic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70544-7 |
_version_ | 1783571604404436992 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lei Huang, Wenbin Li, Yuanpeng Evans, Julian He, Sailing |
author_facet | Wang, Lei Huang, Wenbin Li, Yuanpeng Evans, Julian He, Sailing |
author_sort | Wang, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Predicting and modeling human behavior and finding trends within human decision-making processes is a major problem of social science. Rock Paper Scissors (RPS) is the fundamental strategic question in many game theory problems and real-world competitions. Finding the right approach to beat a particular human opponent is challenging. Here we use an AI (artificial intelligence) algorithm based on Markov Models of one fixed memory length (abbreviated as “single AI”) to compete against humans in an iterated RPS game. We model and predict human competition behavior by combining many Markov Models with different fixed memory lengths (abbreviated as “multi-AI”), and develop an architecture of multi-AI with changeable parameters to adapt to different competition strategies. We introduce a parameter called “focus length” (a positive number such as 5 or 10) to control the speed and sensitivity for our multi-AI to adapt to the opponent’s strategy change. The focus length is the number of previous rounds that the multi-AI should look at when determining which Single-AI has the best performance and should choose to play for the next game. We experimented with 52 different people, each playing 300 rounds continuously against one specific multi-AI model, and demonstrated that our strategy could win against more than 95% of human opponents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7431549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74315492020-08-18 Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game Wang, Lei Huang, Wenbin Li, Yuanpeng Evans, Julian He, Sailing Sci Rep Article Predicting and modeling human behavior and finding trends within human decision-making processes is a major problem of social science. Rock Paper Scissors (RPS) is the fundamental strategic question in many game theory problems and real-world competitions. Finding the right approach to beat a particular human opponent is challenging. Here we use an AI (artificial intelligence) algorithm based on Markov Models of one fixed memory length (abbreviated as “single AI”) to compete against humans in an iterated RPS game. We model and predict human competition behavior by combining many Markov Models with different fixed memory lengths (abbreviated as “multi-AI”), and develop an architecture of multi-AI with changeable parameters to adapt to different competition strategies. We introduce a parameter called “focus length” (a positive number such as 5 or 10) to control the speed and sensitivity for our multi-AI to adapt to the opponent’s strategy change. The focus length is the number of previous rounds that the multi-AI should look at when determining which Single-AI has the best performance and should choose to play for the next game. We experimented with 52 different people, each playing 300 rounds continuously against one specific multi-AI model, and demonstrated that our strategy could win against more than 95% of human opponents. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7431549/ /pubmed/32807813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70544-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Lei Huang, Wenbin Li, Yuanpeng Evans, Julian He, Sailing Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title | Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title_full | Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title_fullStr | Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title_short | Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title_sort | multi-ai competing and winning against humans in iterated rock-paper-scissors game |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70544-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglei multiaicompetingandwinningagainsthumansiniteratedrockpaperscissorsgame AT huangwenbin multiaicompetingandwinningagainsthumansiniteratedrockpaperscissorsgame AT liyuanpeng multiaicompetingandwinningagainsthumansiniteratedrockpaperscissorsgame AT evansjulian multiaicompetingandwinningagainsthumansiniteratedrockpaperscissorsgame AT hesailing multiaicompetingandwinningagainsthumansiniteratedrockpaperscissorsgame |