Cargando…
A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expendit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70296-4 |
_version_ | 1783571612848619520 |
---|---|
author | Hattersley, John Wilson, Adrian J. Gifford, Rob Facer-Childs, Jamie Stoten, Oliver Cobb, Rinn Thake, C. Doug Reynolds, Rebecca M. Woods, David Imray, Chris |
author_facet | Hattersley, John Wilson, Adrian J. Gifford, Rob Facer-Childs, Jamie Stoten, Oliver Cobb, Rinn Thake, C. Doug Reynolds, Rebecca M. Woods, David Imray, Chris |
author_sort | Hattersley, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expenditure and substrate utilisation were measured by a standardised 36 h calorimetry protocol; body composition was determined using air displacement plethysmography. Energy balance calculation were used to assess the physical challenge. There was difference in the daily energy expenditure (IM: 4,939 kcal day(−1); SP-17: 6,461 kcal day(−1), p = 0.004); differences related to physical activity were small, but statistically significant (IM = 2,282 kcal day(−1); SP-17 = 3,174 kcal day(−1); p = 0.004). Bodyweight loss was modest (IM = 7.8%, SP-17 = 6.5%; p > 0.05) as was fat loss (IM = 30.4%, SP-17 = 40.4%; p > 0.05). Lean tissue weight change was statistically significant (IM = − 2.5%, SP-17 = + 1.0%; p = 0.05). No difference was found in resting or sleeping energy expenditure, normalised to lean tissue weight (p > 0.05); nor in energy expenditure when exercising at 80, 100 and 120 steps min(−1), normalised to body weight (p > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the change in normalised substrate utilisation for any of the activities (p > 0.05). Analysis suggested that higher daily energy expenditures for the men in Spear-17 was the result of higher physical demands resulting in a reduced demand for energy to thermoregulate compared to the women in Ice Maiden. The lack of differences between men and women in the change in energy expenditure and substrate utilisation, suggests no sex difference in response to exposure to extreme environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7431584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74315842020-08-18 A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women Hattersley, John Wilson, Adrian J. Gifford, Rob Facer-Childs, Jamie Stoten, Oliver Cobb, Rinn Thake, C. Doug Reynolds, Rebecca M. Woods, David Imray, Chris Sci Rep Article This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expenditure and substrate utilisation were measured by a standardised 36 h calorimetry protocol; body composition was determined using air displacement plethysmography. Energy balance calculation were used to assess the physical challenge. There was difference in the daily energy expenditure (IM: 4,939 kcal day(−1); SP-17: 6,461 kcal day(−1), p = 0.004); differences related to physical activity were small, but statistically significant (IM = 2,282 kcal day(−1); SP-17 = 3,174 kcal day(−1); p = 0.004). Bodyweight loss was modest (IM = 7.8%, SP-17 = 6.5%; p > 0.05) as was fat loss (IM = 30.4%, SP-17 = 40.4%; p > 0.05). Lean tissue weight change was statistically significant (IM = − 2.5%, SP-17 = + 1.0%; p = 0.05). No difference was found in resting or sleeping energy expenditure, normalised to lean tissue weight (p > 0.05); nor in energy expenditure when exercising at 80, 100 and 120 steps min(−1), normalised to body weight (p > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the change in normalised substrate utilisation for any of the activities (p > 0.05). Analysis suggested that higher daily energy expenditures for the men in Spear-17 was the result of higher physical demands resulting in a reduced demand for energy to thermoregulate compared to the women in Ice Maiden. The lack of differences between men and women in the change in energy expenditure and substrate utilisation, suggests no sex difference in response to exposure to extreme environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7431584/ /pubmed/32807833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70296-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hattersley, John Wilson, Adrian J. Gifford, Rob Facer-Childs, Jamie Stoten, Oliver Cobb, Rinn Thake, C. Doug Reynolds, Rebecca M. Woods, David Imray, Chris A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
title | A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
title_full | A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
title_short | A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
title_sort | comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70296-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hattersleyjohn acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT wilsonadrianj acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT giffordrob acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT facerchildsjamie acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT stotenoliver acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT cobbrinn acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT thakecdoug acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT reynoldsrebeccam acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT woodsdavid acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT imraychris acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT hattersleyjohn comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT wilsonadrianj comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT giffordrob comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT facerchildsjamie comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT stotenoliver comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT cobbrinn comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT thakecdoug comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT reynoldsrebeccam comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT woodsdavid comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen AT imraychris comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen |