Cargando…

A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women

This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expendit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hattersley, John, Wilson, Adrian J., Gifford, Rob, Facer-Childs, Jamie, Stoten, Oliver, Cobb, Rinn, Thake, C. Doug, Reynolds, Rebecca M., Woods, David, Imray, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70296-4
_version_ 1783571612848619520
author Hattersley, John
Wilson, Adrian J.
Gifford, Rob
Facer-Childs, Jamie
Stoten, Oliver
Cobb, Rinn
Thake, C. Doug
Reynolds, Rebecca M.
Woods, David
Imray, Chris
author_facet Hattersley, John
Wilson, Adrian J.
Gifford, Rob
Facer-Childs, Jamie
Stoten, Oliver
Cobb, Rinn
Thake, C. Doug
Reynolds, Rebecca M.
Woods, David
Imray, Chris
author_sort Hattersley, John
collection PubMed
description This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expenditure and substrate utilisation were measured by a standardised 36 h calorimetry protocol; body composition was determined using air displacement plethysmography. Energy balance calculation were used to assess the physical challenge. There was difference in the daily energy expenditure (IM: 4,939 kcal day(−1); SP-17: 6,461 kcal day(−1), p = 0.004); differences related to physical activity were small, but statistically significant (IM = 2,282 kcal day(−1); SP-17 = 3,174 kcal day(−1); p = 0.004). Bodyweight loss was modest (IM = 7.8%, SP-17 = 6.5%; p > 0.05) as was fat loss (IM = 30.4%, SP-17 = 40.4%; p > 0.05). Lean tissue weight change was statistically significant (IM = − 2.5%, SP-17 = + 1.0%; p = 0.05). No difference was found in resting or sleeping energy expenditure, normalised to lean tissue weight (p > 0.05); nor in energy expenditure when exercising at 80, 100 and 120 steps min(−1), normalised to body weight (p > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the change in normalised substrate utilisation for any of the activities (p > 0.05). Analysis suggested that higher daily energy expenditures for the men in Spear-17 was the result of higher physical demands resulting in a reduced demand for energy to thermoregulate compared to the women in Ice Maiden. The lack of differences between men and women in the change in energy expenditure and substrate utilisation, suggests no sex difference in response to exposure to extreme environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74315842020-08-18 A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women Hattersley, John Wilson, Adrian J. Gifford, Rob Facer-Childs, Jamie Stoten, Oliver Cobb, Rinn Thake, C. Doug Reynolds, Rebecca M. Woods, David Imray, Chris Sci Rep Article This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expenditure and substrate utilisation were measured by a standardised 36 h calorimetry protocol; body composition was determined using air displacement plethysmography. Energy balance calculation were used to assess the physical challenge. There was difference in the daily energy expenditure (IM: 4,939 kcal day(−1); SP-17: 6,461 kcal day(−1), p = 0.004); differences related to physical activity were small, but statistically significant (IM = 2,282 kcal day(−1); SP-17 = 3,174 kcal day(−1); p = 0.004). Bodyweight loss was modest (IM = 7.8%, SP-17 = 6.5%; p > 0.05) as was fat loss (IM = 30.4%, SP-17 = 40.4%; p > 0.05). Lean tissue weight change was statistically significant (IM = − 2.5%, SP-17 = + 1.0%; p = 0.05). No difference was found in resting or sleeping energy expenditure, normalised to lean tissue weight (p > 0.05); nor in energy expenditure when exercising at 80, 100 and 120 steps min(−1), normalised to body weight (p > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the change in normalised substrate utilisation for any of the activities (p > 0.05). Analysis suggested that higher daily energy expenditures for the men in Spear-17 was the result of higher physical demands resulting in a reduced demand for energy to thermoregulate compared to the women in Ice Maiden. The lack of differences between men and women in the change in energy expenditure and substrate utilisation, suggests no sex difference in response to exposure to extreme environments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7431584/ /pubmed/32807833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70296-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hattersley, John
Wilson, Adrian J.
Gifford, Rob
Facer-Childs, Jamie
Stoten, Oliver
Cobb, Rinn
Thake, C. Doug
Reynolds, Rebecca M.
Woods, David
Imray, Chris
A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
title A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
title_full A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
title_fullStr A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
title_short A comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
title_sort comparison of the metabolic effects of sustained strenuous activity in polar environments on men and women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70296-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hattersleyjohn acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT wilsonadrianj acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT giffordrob acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT facerchildsjamie acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT stotenoliver acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT cobbrinn acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT thakecdoug acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT reynoldsrebeccam acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT woodsdavid acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT imraychris acomparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT hattersleyjohn comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT wilsonadrianj comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT giffordrob comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT facerchildsjamie comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT stotenoliver comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT cobbrinn comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT thakecdoug comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT reynoldsrebeccam comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT woodsdavid comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen
AT imraychris comparisonofthemetaboliceffectsofsustainedstrenuousactivityinpolarenvironmentsonmenandwomen