Cargando…

Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform

BACKGROUND: We have developed an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform (KD‐295). OBJECTIVES: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endo, Masafumi, Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi, Ibaragi, Kayo, Hayashida, Kenshi, Fukuda, Tadashi, Tanabe, Tetsuro, Naruse, Takeshi, Kino, Yoichiro, Ueda, Kohji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12755
_version_ 1783571626476961792
author Endo, Masafumi
Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi
Ibaragi, Kayo
Hayashida, Kenshi
Fukuda, Tadashi
Tanabe, Tetsuro
Naruse, Takeshi
Kino, Yoichiro
Ueda, Kohji
author_facet Endo, Masafumi
Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi
Ibaragi, Kayo
Hayashida, Kenshi
Fukuda, Tadashi
Tanabe, Tetsuro
Naruse, Takeshi
Kino, Yoichiro
Ueda, Kohji
author_sort Endo, Masafumi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We have developed an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform (KD‐295). OBJECTIVES: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group comparison study and the phase III study was conducted in an open‐label, non‐randomized, uncontrolled study. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers aged 20 ‐ 64 years enrolled in the phase II and III studies (N = 248 and N = 369) received KD‐295 intramuscularly twice with a 21‐day interval. After administration, immune response and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase II study, four different vaccine formulations were compared: MA (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA] antigen + AS03 adjuvant system), MB (3.75 μg HA + 1/2AS03), HA (7.5 μg HA + AS03), and HB (7.5 μg HA + 1/2AS03). In the phase III study, the MA formulation was further evaluated. RESULTS: In the phase II study, all four vaccine formulations were well‐tolerated and no SAE related to vaccination were observed. The MA formulation was slightly more immunogenic and less reactogenic among the vaccine formulations. Therefore, the MA formulation was selected for the phase III study, and it was well‐tolerated and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed. The vaccine fulfilled the three immunogenicity criteria described in the Japanese guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the MA formulation of KD‐295 was well‐tolerated and highly immunogenic and it can be considered a useful pandemic and pre‐pandemic influenza vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7431644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74316442020-09-01 Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform Endo, Masafumi Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi Ibaragi, Kayo Hayashida, Kenshi Fukuda, Tadashi Tanabe, Tetsuro Naruse, Takeshi Kino, Yoichiro Ueda, Kohji Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: We have developed an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform (KD‐295). OBJECTIVES: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group comparison study and the phase III study was conducted in an open‐label, non‐randomized, uncontrolled study. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers aged 20 ‐ 64 years enrolled in the phase II and III studies (N = 248 and N = 369) received KD‐295 intramuscularly twice with a 21‐day interval. After administration, immune response and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase II study, four different vaccine formulations were compared: MA (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA] antigen + AS03 adjuvant system), MB (3.75 μg HA + 1/2AS03), HA (7.5 μg HA + AS03), and HB (7.5 μg HA + 1/2AS03). In the phase III study, the MA formulation was further evaluated. RESULTS: In the phase II study, all four vaccine formulations were well‐tolerated and no SAE related to vaccination were observed. The MA formulation was slightly more immunogenic and less reactogenic among the vaccine formulations. Therefore, the MA formulation was selected for the phase III study, and it was well‐tolerated and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed. The vaccine fulfilled the three immunogenicity criteria described in the Japanese guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the MA formulation of KD‐295 was well‐tolerated and highly immunogenic and it can be considered a useful pandemic and pre‐pandemic influenza vaccine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-24 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7431644/ /pubmed/32579785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12755 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Endo, Masafumi
Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi
Ibaragi, Kayo
Hayashida, Kenshi
Fukuda, Tadashi
Tanabe, Tetsuro
Naruse, Takeshi
Kino, Yoichiro
Ueda, Kohji
Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
title Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
title_full Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
title_fullStr Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
title_full_unstemmed Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
title_short Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
title_sort clinical phase ii and iii studies of an as03‐adjuvanted h5n1 influenza vaccine produced in an eb66(®) cell culture platform
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12755
work_keys_str_mv AT endomasafumi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT tanishimamitsuyoshi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT ibaragikayo clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT hayashidakenshi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT fukudatadashi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT tanabetetsuro clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT narusetakeshi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT kinoyoichiro clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform
AT uedakohji clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform