Cargando…
Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform
BACKGROUND: We have developed an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform (KD‐295). OBJECTIVES: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12755 |
_version_ | 1783571626476961792 |
---|---|
author | Endo, Masafumi Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi Ibaragi, Kayo Hayashida, Kenshi Fukuda, Tadashi Tanabe, Tetsuro Naruse, Takeshi Kino, Yoichiro Ueda, Kohji |
author_facet | Endo, Masafumi Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi Ibaragi, Kayo Hayashida, Kenshi Fukuda, Tadashi Tanabe, Tetsuro Naruse, Takeshi Kino, Yoichiro Ueda, Kohji |
author_sort | Endo, Masafumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We have developed an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform (KD‐295). OBJECTIVES: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group comparison study and the phase III study was conducted in an open‐label, non‐randomized, uncontrolled study. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers aged 20 ‐ 64 years enrolled in the phase II and III studies (N = 248 and N = 369) received KD‐295 intramuscularly twice with a 21‐day interval. After administration, immune response and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase II study, four different vaccine formulations were compared: MA (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA] antigen + AS03 adjuvant system), MB (3.75 μg HA + 1/2AS03), HA (7.5 μg HA + AS03), and HB (7.5 μg HA + 1/2AS03). In the phase III study, the MA formulation was further evaluated. RESULTS: In the phase II study, all four vaccine formulations were well‐tolerated and no SAE related to vaccination were observed. The MA formulation was slightly more immunogenic and less reactogenic among the vaccine formulations. Therefore, the MA formulation was selected for the phase III study, and it was well‐tolerated and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed. The vaccine fulfilled the three immunogenicity criteria described in the Japanese guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the MA formulation of KD‐295 was well‐tolerated and highly immunogenic and it can be considered a useful pandemic and pre‐pandemic influenza vaccine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7431644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74316442020-09-01 Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform Endo, Masafumi Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi Ibaragi, Kayo Hayashida, Kenshi Fukuda, Tadashi Tanabe, Tetsuro Naruse, Takeshi Kino, Yoichiro Ueda, Kohji Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: We have developed an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform (KD‐295). OBJECTIVES: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group comparison study and the phase III study was conducted in an open‐label, non‐randomized, uncontrolled study. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers aged 20 ‐ 64 years enrolled in the phase II and III studies (N = 248 and N = 369) received KD‐295 intramuscularly twice with a 21‐day interval. After administration, immune response and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase II study, four different vaccine formulations were compared: MA (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA] antigen + AS03 adjuvant system), MB (3.75 μg HA + 1/2AS03), HA (7.5 μg HA + AS03), and HB (7.5 μg HA + 1/2AS03). In the phase III study, the MA formulation was further evaluated. RESULTS: In the phase II study, all four vaccine formulations were well‐tolerated and no SAE related to vaccination were observed. The MA formulation was slightly more immunogenic and less reactogenic among the vaccine formulations. Therefore, the MA formulation was selected for the phase III study, and it was well‐tolerated and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed. The vaccine fulfilled the three immunogenicity criteria described in the Japanese guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the MA formulation of KD‐295 was well‐tolerated and highly immunogenic and it can be considered a useful pandemic and pre‐pandemic influenza vaccine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-24 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7431644/ /pubmed/32579785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12755 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Endo, Masafumi Tanishima, Mitsuyoshi Ibaragi, Kayo Hayashida, Kenshi Fukuda, Tadashi Tanabe, Tetsuro Naruse, Takeshi Kino, Yoichiro Ueda, Kohji Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform |
title | Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform |
title_full | Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform |
title_fullStr | Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform |
title_short | Clinical phase II and III studies of an AS03‐adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66(®) cell culture platform |
title_sort | clinical phase ii and iii studies of an as03‐adjuvanted h5n1 influenza vaccine produced in an eb66(®) cell culture platform |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT endomasafumi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT tanishimamitsuyoshi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT ibaragikayo clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT hayashidakenshi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT fukudatadashi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT tanabetetsuro clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT narusetakeshi clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT kinoyoichiro clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform AT uedakohji clinicalphaseiiandiiistudiesofanas03adjuvantedh5n1influenzavaccineproducedinaneb66cellcultureplatform |