Cargando…

Intraocular Pressure Changes after Water Drinking Test in Surgically Treated Primary Congenital Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To assess intraocular pressure (IOP) changes after the water drinking test (WDT) in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). METHODS: In this prospective interventional study, 20 eyes of 20 patients with PCG were included. All patients had undergone trabeculotomy. Six out of twenty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razeghinejad, Reza, Tajbakhsh, Zahra, Masoumpour, Masoumeh Beigom, Nowroozzadeh, M. Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7431708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864062
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i3.7450
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To assess intraocular pressure (IOP) changes after the water drinking test (WDT) in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). METHODS: In this prospective interventional study, 20 eyes of 20 patients with PCG were included. All patients had undergone trabeculotomy. Six out of twenty eyes had received a glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation. IOP was measured using an air-puff tonometer at baseline, and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after WDT. The repeated-measures analysis of variance test was used to compare the mean IOPs at different time points. RESULTS: The mean ([Formula: see text] standard deviation) of participants' age was 9.9 [Formula: see text] 2.7 years (range, 6 to 16 years), and 8 (40%) participants were male. The mean IOPs at baseline and 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the WDT were 15.8 [Formula: see text] 3.7, 18.6 [Formula: see text] 3.4, 19.0 [Formula: see text] 3.8, 17.9 [Formula: see text] 3.8, and 16.9 [Formula: see text] 3.5 mmHg, respectively (P [Formula: see text] 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed that the mean IOPs after 15 and 30 min were significantly greater than the baseline IOP (P [Formula: see text] 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively); however, the difference in mean IOPs after 45 and 60 min were not statistically significant from the baseline IOP. The averages of IOP peak and IOP fluctuation after the WDT were 20.0 [Formula: see text] 3.5 and 4.2 [Formula: see text] 2.9 mmHg, respectively. IOP fluctuation in those who underwent trabeculotomy alone was twice that of those with GDDs, but the difference was not statistically significant (5.0 vs 2.5 mmHg; P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: In patients with PCG, WDT induced significant IOP elevation 15 and 30 min after the test, which returned to pre-test values after 45 min.