Cargando…

Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study

BACKGROUND: Almost half (46%) of Americans have used a smart assistant of some kind (eg, Apple Siri), and 25% have used a stand-alone smart assistant (eg, Amazon Echo). This positions smart assistants as potentially useful modalities for retrieving health-related information; however, the accuracy o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrand, John, Hockensmith, Ryli, Houghton, Rebecca Fagen, Walsh-Buhi, Eric R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744508
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19018
_version_ 1783571734022062080
author Ferrand, John
Hockensmith, Ryli
Houghton, Rebecca Fagen
Walsh-Buhi, Eric R
author_facet Ferrand, John
Hockensmith, Ryli
Houghton, Rebecca Fagen
Walsh-Buhi, Eric R
author_sort Ferrand, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Almost half (46%) of Americans have used a smart assistant of some kind (eg, Apple Siri), and 25% have used a stand-alone smart assistant (eg, Amazon Echo). This positions smart assistants as potentially useful modalities for retrieving health-related information; however, the accuracy of smart assistant responses lacks rigorous evaluation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the levels of accuracy, misinformation, and sentiment in smart assistant responses to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination–related questions. METHODS: We systematically examined responses to questions about the HPV vaccine from the following four most popular smart assistants: Apple Siri, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Microsoft Cortana. One team member posed 10 questions to each smart assistant and recorded all queries and responses. Two raters independently coded all responses (κ=0.85). We then assessed differences among the smart assistants in terms of response accuracy, presence of misinformation, and sentiment regarding the HPV vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 103 responses were obtained from the 10 questions posed across the smart assistants. Google Assistant data were excluded owing to nonresponse. Over half (n=63, 61%) of the responses of the remaining three smart assistants were accurate. We found statistically significant differences across the smart assistants (N=103, χ(2)(2)=7.807, P=.02), with Cortana yielding the greatest proportion of misinformation. Siri yielded the greatest proportion of accurate responses (n=26, 72%), whereas Cortana yielded the lowest proportion of accurate responses (n=33, 54%). Most response sentiments across smart assistants were positive (n=65, 64%) or neutral (n=18, 18%), but Cortana’s responses yielded the largest proportion of negative sentiment (n=7, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Smart assistants appear to be average-quality sources for HPV vaccination information, with Alexa responding most reliably. Cortana returned the largest proportion of inaccurate responses, the most misinformation, and the greatest proportion of results with negative sentiments. More collaboration between technology companies and public health entities is necessary to improve the retrieval of accurate health information via smart assistants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7432152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74321522020-10-15 Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study Ferrand, John Hockensmith, Ryli Houghton, Rebecca Fagen Walsh-Buhi, Eric R J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Almost half (46%) of Americans have used a smart assistant of some kind (eg, Apple Siri), and 25% have used a stand-alone smart assistant (eg, Amazon Echo). This positions smart assistants as potentially useful modalities for retrieving health-related information; however, the accuracy of smart assistant responses lacks rigorous evaluation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the levels of accuracy, misinformation, and sentiment in smart assistant responses to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination–related questions. METHODS: We systematically examined responses to questions about the HPV vaccine from the following four most popular smart assistants: Apple Siri, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Microsoft Cortana. One team member posed 10 questions to each smart assistant and recorded all queries and responses. Two raters independently coded all responses (κ=0.85). We then assessed differences among the smart assistants in terms of response accuracy, presence of misinformation, and sentiment regarding the HPV vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 103 responses were obtained from the 10 questions posed across the smart assistants. Google Assistant data were excluded owing to nonresponse. Over half (n=63, 61%) of the responses of the remaining three smart assistants were accurate. We found statistically significant differences across the smart assistants (N=103, χ(2)(2)=7.807, P=.02), with Cortana yielding the greatest proportion of misinformation. Siri yielded the greatest proportion of accurate responses (n=26, 72%), whereas Cortana yielded the lowest proportion of accurate responses (n=33, 54%). Most response sentiments across smart assistants were positive (n=65, 64%) or neutral (n=18, 18%), but Cortana’s responses yielded the largest proportion of negative sentiment (n=7, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Smart assistants appear to be average-quality sources for HPV vaccination information, with Alexa responding most reliably. Cortana returned the largest proportion of inaccurate responses, the most misinformation, and the greatest proportion of results with negative sentiments. More collaboration between technology companies and public health entities is necessary to improve the retrieval of accurate health information via smart assistants. JMIR Publications 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7432152/ /pubmed/32744508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19018 Text en ©John Ferrand, Ryli Hockensmith, Rebecca Fagen Houghton, Eric R Walsh-Buhi. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 03.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ferrand, John
Hockensmith, Ryli
Houghton, Rebecca Fagen
Walsh-Buhi, Eric R
Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
title Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
title_full Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
title_fullStr Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
title_short Evaluating Smart Assistant Responses for Accuracy and Misinformation Regarding Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Content Analysis Study
title_sort evaluating smart assistant responses for accuracy and misinformation regarding human papillomavirus vaccination: content analysis study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32744508
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19018
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrandjohn evaluatingsmartassistantresponsesforaccuracyandmisinformationregardinghumanpapillomavirusvaccinationcontentanalysisstudy
AT hockensmithryli evaluatingsmartassistantresponsesforaccuracyandmisinformationregardinghumanpapillomavirusvaccinationcontentanalysisstudy
AT houghtonrebeccafagen evaluatingsmartassistantresponsesforaccuracyandmisinformationregardinghumanpapillomavirusvaccinationcontentanalysisstudy
AT walshbuhiericr evaluatingsmartassistantresponsesforaccuracyandmisinformationregardinghumanpapillomavirusvaccinationcontentanalysisstudy