Cargando…

Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?

The aim of the study was to answer the questions whether a chronic disease can have a significant impact on the level of adherence and whether there are differences in adherence-related predictors depending on the chronic disease. The study included 1,571 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 11.3) with chronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jankowska-Polańska, Beata, Karniej, Piotr, Polański, Jacek, Seń, Mariola, Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia, Grochans, Elżbieta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01157
_version_ 1783571771410087936
author Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
Karniej, Piotr
Polański, Jacek
Seń, Mariola
Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia
Grochans, Elżbieta
author_facet Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
Karniej, Piotr
Polański, Jacek
Seń, Mariola
Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia
Grochans, Elżbieta
author_sort Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to answer the questions whether a chronic disease can have a significant impact on the level of adherence and whether there are differences in adherence-related predictors depending on the chronic disease. The study included 1,571 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 11.3) with chronic diseases [1,030 diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and 541 hypertension (HA)]. Adherence was assessed using the Adherence Refills Medication Scale (ARMS). The average adherence score for the whole group was 18.9. Fifty-five percent of patients had a low level of adherence. A comparison between DM and HA shows a statistically significant difference and a higher level of adherence with pharmacological recommendations in the group of patients with type 2 DM (17.5 ± 12.0 vs 19.2 ± 8.0). In the single factors analysis, HA diagnosis had a statistically significant negative effect on adherence (β=0.92, p ≤ 0.001). In simple linear regression analysis, independent of chronic disease, a higher level of adherence was observed among women (β=−0.40, p=0.015), people with secondary education (β=−1.26, p ≤ 0.001), and inactive patients (β=−0.48; p=0.005). However, place of residence - countryside (β =0.35, p=0.044) and higher education (β=0.90, p ≤ 0.001) had a negative influence on the level of adherence. In multiple linear regression analysis HA (B=0.99; p ≤ 0.001), female gender (B=−0.47; p=0.003) and secondary education (B=−1.16; p ≤ 0.001) were important independent determinants of adherence. (1) Hypertension is an independent, statistically significant predictor that reduces the adherence level. (2) Female gender and higher education are the most important determinants improving adherence to pharmacological therapy. (3) There is a different pattern of predictors of adherence among patients: occupational activity plays an important role in DM, while education plays a role in HA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7432322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74323222020-08-25 Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence? Jankowska-Polańska, Beata Karniej, Piotr Polański, Jacek Seń, Mariola Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia Grochans, Elżbieta Front Pharmacol Pharmacology The aim of the study was to answer the questions whether a chronic disease can have a significant impact on the level of adherence and whether there are differences in adherence-related predictors depending on the chronic disease. The study included 1,571 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 11.3) with chronic diseases [1,030 diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and 541 hypertension (HA)]. Adherence was assessed using the Adherence Refills Medication Scale (ARMS). The average adherence score for the whole group was 18.9. Fifty-five percent of patients had a low level of adherence. A comparison between DM and HA shows a statistically significant difference and a higher level of adherence with pharmacological recommendations in the group of patients with type 2 DM (17.5 ± 12.0 vs 19.2 ± 8.0). In the single factors analysis, HA diagnosis had a statistically significant negative effect on adherence (β=0.92, p ≤ 0.001). In simple linear regression analysis, independent of chronic disease, a higher level of adherence was observed among women (β=−0.40, p=0.015), people with secondary education (β=−1.26, p ≤ 0.001), and inactive patients (β=−0.48; p=0.005). However, place of residence - countryside (β =0.35, p=0.044) and higher education (β=0.90, p ≤ 0.001) had a negative influence on the level of adherence. In multiple linear regression analysis HA (B=0.99; p ≤ 0.001), female gender (B=−0.47; p=0.003) and secondary education (B=−1.16; p ≤ 0.001) were important independent determinants of adherence. (1) Hypertension is an independent, statistically significant predictor that reduces the adherence level. (2) Female gender and higher education are the most important determinants improving adherence to pharmacological therapy. (3) There is a different pattern of predictors of adherence among patients: occupational activity plays an important role in DM, while education plays a role in HA. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7432322/ /pubmed/32848766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01157 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jankowska-Polańska, Karniej, Polański, Seń, Świątoniowska-Lonc and Grochans http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Jankowska-Polańska, Beata
Karniej, Piotr
Polański, Jacek
Seń, Mariola
Świątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia
Grochans, Elżbieta
Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?
title Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?
title_full Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?
title_fullStr Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?
title_short Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension—Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?
title_sort diabetes mellitus versus hypertension—does disease affect pharmacological adherence?
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01157
work_keys_str_mv AT jankowskapolanskabeata diabetesmellitusversushypertensiondoesdiseaseaffectpharmacologicaladherence
AT karniejpiotr diabetesmellitusversushypertensiondoesdiseaseaffectpharmacologicaladherence
AT polanskijacek diabetesmellitusversushypertensiondoesdiseaseaffectpharmacologicaladherence
AT senmariola diabetesmellitusversushypertensiondoesdiseaseaffectpharmacologicaladherence
AT swiatoniowskaloncnatalia diabetesmellitusversushypertensiondoesdiseaseaffectpharmacologicaladherence
AT grochanselzbieta diabetesmellitusversushypertensiondoesdiseaseaffectpharmacologicaladherence