Cargando…

Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia

Garnering support for smoke-free policies is critical for their successful adoption, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence, such as Armenia and Georgia. In 2018, we surveyed 1456 residents (ages 18–64) of 28 cities in Armenia (n = 705) and Georgia (n = 751). We examined support for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topuridze, Marina, Berg, Carla J., Dekanosidze, Ana, Torosyan, Arevik, Grigoryan, Lilit, Bazarchyan, Alexander, Sargsyan, Zhanna, Hayrumyan, Varduhi, Maglakelidze, Nino, Sturua, Lela, Haardörfer, Regine, Kegler, Michelle C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155527
_version_ 1783571865607864320
author Topuridze, Marina
Berg, Carla J.
Dekanosidze, Ana
Torosyan, Arevik
Grigoryan, Lilit
Bazarchyan, Alexander
Sargsyan, Zhanna
Hayrumyan, Varduhi
Maglakelidze, Nino
Sturua, Lela
Haardörfer, Regine
Kegler, Michelle C.
author_facet Topuridze, Marina
Berg, Carla J.
Dekanosidze, Ana
Torosyan, Arevik
Grigoryan, Lilit
Bazarchyan, Alexander
Sargsyan, Zhanna
Hayrumyan, Varduhi
Maglakelidze, Nino
Sturua, Lela
Haardörfer, Regine
Kegler, Michelle C.
author_sort Topuridze, Marina
collection PubMed
description Garnering support for smoke-free policies is critical for their successful adoption, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence, such as Armenia and Georgia. In 2018, we surveyed 1456 residents (ages 18–64) of 28 cities in Armenia (n = 705) and Georgia (n = 751). We examined support for cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)/heated tobacco product (HTP) smoke-free policies in various locations and persuasiveness of pro- and anti-policy messaging. Participants were an average age of 43.35, 60.5% female, and 27.3% current smokers. Nonsmokers versus smokers indicated greater policy support for cigarette and ENDS/HTP and greater persuasiveness of pro-policy messaging. Armenians versus Georgians generally perceived pro- and anti-policy messaging more persuasive. In multilevel linear regression, sociodemographics (e.g., female) and tobacco use characteristics (e.g., smoking less frequently, higher quitting importance) correlated with more policy support. Greatest policy support was for healthcare, religious, government, and workplace settings; public transport; schools; and vehicles carrying children. Least policy support was for bar/restaurant outdoor areas. The most compelling pro-policy message focused on the right to clean air; the most compelling anti-policy message focused on using nonsmoking sections. Specific settings may present challenges for advancing smoke-free policies. Messaging focusing on individual rights to clean air and health may garner support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7432748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74327482020-08-27 Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia Topuridze, Marina Berg, Carla J. Dekanosidze, Ana Torosyan, Arevik Grigoryan, Lilit Bazarchyan, Alexander Sargsyan, Zhanna Hayrumyan, Varduhi Maglakelidze, Nino Sturua, Lela Haardörfer, Regine Kegler, Michelle C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Garnering support for smoke-free policies is critical for their successful adoption, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence, such as Armenia and Georgia. In 2018, we surveyed 1456 residents (ages 18–64) of 28 cities in Armenia (n = 705) and Georgia (n = 751). We examined support for cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)/heated tobacco product (HTP) smoke-free policies in various locations and persuasiveness of pro- and anti-policy messaging. Participants were an average age of 43.35, 60.5% female, and 27.3% current smokers. Nonsmokers versus smokers indicated greater policy support for cigarette and ENDS/HTP and greater persuasiveness of pro-policy messaging. Armenians versus Georgians generally perceived pro- and anti-policy messaging more persuasive. In multilevel linear regression, sociodemographics (e.g., female) and tobacco use characteristics (e.g., smoking less frequently, higher quitting importance) correlated with more policy support. Greatest policy support was for healthcare, religious, government, and workplace settings; public transport; schools; and vehicles carrying children. Least policy support was for bar/restaurant outdoor areas. The most compelling pro-policy message focused on the right to clean air; the most compelling anti-policy message focused on using nonsmoking sections. Specific settings may present challenges for advancing smoke-free policies. Messaging focusing on individual rights to clean air and health may garner support. MDPI 2020-07-30 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7432748/ /pubmed/32751714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155527 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Topuridze, Marina
Berg, Carla J.
Dekanosidze, Ana
Torosyan, Arevik
Grigoryan, Lilit
Bazarchyan, Alexander
Sargsyan, Zhanna
Hayrumyan, Varduhi
Maglakelidze, Nino
Sturua, Lela
Haardörfer, Regine
Kegler, Michelle C.
Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
title Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
title_full Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
title_fullStr Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
title_short Smokers’ and Nonsmokers’ Receptivity to Smoke-Free Policies and Pro- and Anti-Policy Messaging in Armenia and Georgia
title_sort smokers’ and nonsmokers’ receptivity to smoke-free policies and pro- and anti-policy messaging in armenia and georgia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155527
work_keys_str_mv AT topuridzemarina smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT bergcarlaj smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT dekanosidzeana smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT torosyanarevik smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT grigoryanlilit smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT bazarchyanalexander smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT sargsyanzhanna smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT hayrumyanvarduhi smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT maglakelidzenino smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT sturualela smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT haardorferregine smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia
AT keglermichellec smokersandnonsmokersreceptivitytosmokefreepoliciesandproandantipolicymessaginginarmeniaandgeorgia