Cargando…

Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme

As the country with the largest carbon emissions globally, the effective operation of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is of great importance to the global community in terms of mitigating climate change. This paper considers China’s pilot ETS launched in 2013 as a quasi-natural experim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Di, Liang, Xiaoyu, Zhou, Ye, Tang, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155522
_version_ 1783571907290857472
author Zhou, Di
Liang, Xiaoyu
Zhou, Ye
Tang, Kai
author_facet Zhou, Di
Liang, Xiaoyu
Zhou, Ye
Tang, Kai
author_sort Zhou, Di
collection PubMed
description As the country with the largest carbon emissions globally, the effective operation of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is of great importance to the global community in terms of mitigating climate change. This paper considers China’s pilot ETS launched in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment. Exploring provincial industrial-level data that are more in line with the ETS coverage, the difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) model is used to evaluate the impact of the ETS on carbon productivity. Considering different pilot regions and industries, we also analyze the heterogeneous effect of ETS. Moreover, the mediating effects of technical progress and capital investment are explored. We find that China’s pilot ETS boosted carbon productivity. Among pilot regions, the best policy effectiveness appeared in Beijing, while the weakest effectiveness appeared in Chongqing. Among the pilot industries, the pilot ETS had better effectiveness in petrochemical and electric power industries and weaker effectiveness in building materials and transportation industries. Additionally, the pilot ETS promoted carbon productivity through both technological progress and capital investment, and the former contributed more. Our findings can provide empirical references and policy implications for nationwide implementation of ETS to further promote low-carbon economic transformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7432927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74329272020-08-28 Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme Zhou, Di Liang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Ye Tang, Kai Int J Environ Res Public Health Article As the country with the largest carbon emissions globally, the effective operation of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is of great importance to the global community in terms of mitigating climate change. This paper considers China’s pilot ETS launched in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment. Exploring provincial industrial-level data that are more in line with the ETS coverage, the difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) model is used to evaluate the impact of the ETS on carbon productivity. Considering different pilot regions and industries, we also analyze the heterogeneous effect of ETS. Moreover, the mediating effects of technical progress and capital investment are explored. We find that China’s pilot ETS boosted carbon productivity. Among pilot regions, the best policy effectiveness appeared in Beijing, while the weakest effectiveness appeared in Chongqing. Among the pilot industries, the pilot ETS had better effectiveness in petrochemical and electric power industries and weaker effectiveness in building materials and transportation industries. Additionally, the pilot ETS promoted carbon productivity through both technological progress and capital investment, and the former contributed more. Our findings can provide empirical references and policy implications for nationwide implementation of ETS to further promote low-carbon economic transformation. MDPI 2020-07-30 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7432927/ /pubmed/32751753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155522 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhou, Di
Liang, Xiaoyu
Zhou, Ye
Tang, Kai
Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
title Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
title_full Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
title_fullStr Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
title_full_unstemmed Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
title_short Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
title_sort does emission trading boost carbon productivity? evidence from china’s pilot emission trading scheme
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155522
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoudi doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme
AT liangxiaoyu doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme
AT zhouye doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme
AT tangkai doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme