Cargando…
Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme
As the country with the largest carbon emissions globally, the effective operation of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is of great importance to the global community in terms of mitigating climate change. This paper considers China’s pilot ETS launched in 2013 as a quasi-natural experim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155522 |
_version_ | 1783571907290857472 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Di Liang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Ye Tang, Kai |
author_facet | Zhou, Di Liang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Ye Tang, Kai |
author_sort | Zhou, Di |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the country with the largest carbon emissions globally, the effective operation of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is of great importance to the global community in terms of mitigating climate change. This paper considers China’s pilot ETS launched in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment. Exploring provincial industrial-level data that are more in line with the ETS coverage, the difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) model is used to evaluate the impact of the ETS on carbon productivity. Considering different pilot regions and industries, we also analyze the heterogeneous effect of ETS. Moreover, the mediating effects of technical progress and capital investment are explored. We find that China’s pilot ETS boosted carbon productivity. Among pilot regions, the best policy effectiveness appeared in Beijing, while the weakest effectiveness appeared in Chongqing. Among the pilot industries, the pilot ETS had better effectiveness in petrochemical and electric power industries and weaker effectiveness in building materials and transportation industries. Additionally, the pilot ETS promoted carbon productivity through both technological progress and capital investment, and the former contributed more. Our findings can provide empirical references and policy implications for nationwide implementation of ETS to further promote low-carbon economic transformation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7432927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74329272020-08-28 Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme Zhou, Di Liang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Ye Tang, Kai Int J Environ Res Public Health Article As the country with the largest carbon emissions globally, the effective operation of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) is of great importance to the global community in terms of mitigating climate change. This paper considers China’s pilot ETS launched in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment. Exploring provincial industrial-level data that are more in line with the ETS coverage, the difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) model is used to evaluate the impact of the ETS on carbon productivity. Considering different pilot regions and industries, we also analyze the heterogeneous effect of ETS. Moreover, the mediating effects of technical progress and capital investment are explored. We find that China’s pilot ETS boosted carbon productivity. Among pilot regions, the best policy effectiveness appeared in Beijing, while the weakest effectiveness appeared in Chongqing. Among the pilot industries, the pilot ETS had better effectiveness in petrochemical and electric power industries and weaker effectiveness in building materials and transportation industries. Additionally, the pilot ETS promoted carbon productivity through both technological progress and capital investment, and the former contributed more. Our findings can provide empirical references and policy implications for nationwide implementation of ETS to further promote low-carbon economic transformation. MDPI 2020-07-30 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7432927/ /pubmed/32751753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155522 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Di Liang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Ye Tang, Kai Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme |
title | Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme |
title_full | Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme |
title_fullStr | Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme |
title_short | Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme |
title_sort | does emission trading boost carbon productivity? evidence from china’s pilot emission trading scheme |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7432927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoudi doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme AT liangxiaoyu doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme AT zhouye doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme AT tangkai doesemissiontradingboostcarbonproductivityevidencefromchinaspilotemissiontradingscheme |