Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale
BACKGROUND: The present study aims to evaluate the performance and the clinical applicability of the Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Department (ROSIER) scale via systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched between 1st January 2005 (wh...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01841-x |
_version_ | 1783571931957559296 |
---|---|
author | Han, Fei Zuo, Chao Zheng, Guodong |
author_facet | Han, Fei Zuo, Chao Zheng, Guodong |
author_sort | Han, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present study aims to evaluate the performance and the clinical applicability of the Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Department (ROSIER) scale via systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched between 1st January 2005 (when ROSIER developed) and 8th May 2020. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the ROSIER scale were included. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were combined using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Fagan nomogram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability of the ROSIER scale. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies incorporating 15 datasets were included in this meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–0.91], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52–0.77), 13.86 (95% CI, 7.67–25.07) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.90), respectively. Given the pre-test probability of 60.0%, Fagan nomogram suggested the post-test probability was increased to 79% when the ROSIER was positive. In comparison, it was decreased to 22% when ROSIER was negative. Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity of ROSIER in the European population was higher than that in Asia. In contrast, the pooled specificity was not significantly different between them. Moreover, results also suggested the male-to-female ratio ≤ 1.0 subgroup, prehospital setting subgroup, and other trained medical personnel subgroup had significantly higher sensitivity compared with their counterparts. At the same time, no significant differences were found in the pooled specificity between them. CONCLUSIONS: ROSIER is a valid scale with high clinical applicability, which has not only good diagnostic accuracy in Europe but also shows excellent performance in Asia. Moreover, the ROSIER scale exhibits good applicability in prehospital settings with other trained medical personnel. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7433071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74330712020-08-19 A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale Han, Fei Zuo, Chao Zheng, Guodong BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: The present study aims to evaluate the performance and the clinical applicability of the Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Department (ROSIER) scale via systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched between 1st January 2005 (when ROSIER developed) and 8th May 2020. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the ROSIER scale were included. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were combined using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Fagan nomogram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability of the ROSIER scale. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies incorporating 15 datasets were included in this meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–0.91], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52–0.77), 13.86 (95% CI, 7.67–25.07) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.90), respectively. Given the pre-test probability of 60.0%, Fagan nomogram suggested the post-test probability was increased to 79% when the ROSIER was positive. In comparison, it was decreased to 22% when ROSIER was negative. Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity of ROSIER in the European population was higher than that in Asia. In contrast, the pooled specificity was not significantly different between them. Moreover, results also suggested the male-to-female ratio ≤ 1.0 subgroup, prehospital setting subgroup, and other trained medical personnel subgroup had significantly higher sensitivity compared with their counterparts. At the same time, no significant differences were found in the pooled specificity between them. CONCLUSIONS: ROSIER is a valid scale with high clinical applicability, which has not only good diagnostic accuracy in Europe but also shows excellent performance in Asia. Moreover, the ROSIER scale exhibits good applicability in prehospital settings with other trained medical personnel. BioMed Central 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7433071/ /pubmed/32811447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01841-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Han, Fei Zuo, Chao Zheng, Guodong A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (rosier) scale |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01841-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanfei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoevaluatethediagnosticaccuracyofrecognitionofstrokeintheemergencydepartmentrosierscale AT zuochao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoevaluatethediagnosticaccuracyofrecognitionofstrokeintheemergencydepartmentrosierscale AT zhengguodong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistoevaluatethediagnosticaccuracyofrecognitionofstrokeintheemergencydepartmentrosierscale AT hanfei systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoevaluatethediagnosticaccuracyofrecognitionofstrokeintheemergencydepartmentrosierscale AT zuochao systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoevaluatethediagnosticaccuracyofrecognitionofstrokeintheemergencydepartmentrosierscale AT zhengguodong systematicreviewandmetaanalysistoevaluatethediagnosticaccuracyofrecognitionofstrokeintheemergencydepartmentrosierscale |