Cargando…
Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Advanced cancer affects people’s lives, often causing stress, anxiety and depression. Peer mentor interventions are used to address psychosocial concerns, but their outcomes and effect are not known. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of delivering and investigating a novel p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00631-z |
_version_ | 1783571953657839616 |
---|---|
author | Walshe, Catherine Roberts, Diane Calman, Lynn Appleton, Lynda Croft, Robert Skevington, Suzanne Lloyd-Williams, Mari Grande, Gunn Perez Algorta, Guillermo |
author_facet | Walshe, Catherine Roberts, Diane Calman, Lynn Appleton, Lynda Croft, Robert Skevington, Suzanne Lloyd-Williams, Mari Grande, Gunn Perez Algorta, Guillermo |
author_sort | Walshe, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advanced cancer affects people’s lives, often causing stress, anxiety and depression. Peer mentor interventions are used to address psychosocial concerns, but their outcomes and effect are not known. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of delivering and investigating a novel peer mentor intervention to promote and maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer. METHODS: A mixed methods design incorporating a two-armed controlled trial (random allocation ratio 1:1) of a proactive peer mentor intervention plus usual care, vs. usual care alone, and a qualitative process evaluation. Peer mentors were recruited, trained, and matched with people with advanced cancer. Quantitative data assessed quality of life, coping styles, depression, social support and use of healthcare and other supports. Qualitative interviews probed experiences of the study and intervention. RESULTS: Peer mentor training and numbers (n = 12) met feasibility targets. Patient participants (n = 12, from 181 eligible who received an information pack) were not recruited to feasibility targets. Those who entered the study demonstrated that intervention delivery and data collection were feasible. Outcome data must be treated with extreme caution due to small numbers, but indicate that the intervention may have a positive effect on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Peer mentor interventions are worthy of further study and researchers can learn from these feasibility data in planning participant recruitment and data collection strategies. Pragmatic trials, where the effectiveness of an intervention is tested in real-world routine practice, may be most appropriate. Peer mentor interventions may have merit in enabling survivors with advanced cancer cope with their disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered 13.6.2016: ISRCTN10276684. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7433175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74331752020-08-19 Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial Walshe, Catherine Roberts, Diane Calman, Lynn Appleton, Lynda Croft, Robert Skevington, Suzanne Lloyd-Williams, Mari Grande, Gunn Perez Algorta, Guillermo BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Advanced cancer affects people’s lives, often causing stress, anxiety and depression. Peer mentor interventions are used to address psychosocial concerns, but their outcomes and effect are not known. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of delivering and investigating a novel peer mentor intervention to promote and maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer. METHODS: A mixed methods design incorporating a two-armed controlled trial (random allocation ratio 1:1) of a proactive peer mentor intervention plus usual care, vs. usual care alone, and a qualitative process evaluation. Peer mentors were recruited, trained, and matched with people with advanced cancer. Quantitative data assessed quality of life, coping styles, depression, social support and use of healthcare and other supports. Qualitative interviews probed experiences of the study and intervention. RESULTS: Peer mentor training and numbers (n = 12) met feasibility targets. Patient participants (n = 12, from 181 eligible who received an information pack) were not recruited to feasibility targets. Those who entered the study demonstrated that intervention delivery and data collection were feasible. Outcome data must be treated with extreme caution due to small numbers, but indicate that the intervention may have a positive effect on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Peer mentor interventions are worthy of further study and researchers can learn from these feasibility data in planning participant recruitment and data collection strategies. Pragmatic trials, where the effectiveness of an intervention is tested in real-world routine practice, may be most appropriate. Peer mentor interventions may have merit in enabling survivors with advanced cancer cope with their disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered 13.6.2016: ISRCTN10276684. BioMed Central 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7433175/ /pubmed/32807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00631-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walshe, Catherine Roberts, Diane Calman, Lynn Appleton, Lynda Croft, Robert Skevington, Suzanne Lloyd-Williams, Mari Grande, Gunn Perez Algorta, Guillermo Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | peer support to maintain psychological wellbeing in people with advanced cancer: findings from a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00631-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walshecatherine peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT robertsdiane peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT calmanlynn peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT appletonlynda peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT croftrobert peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT skevingtonsuzanne peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lloydwilliamsmari peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT grandegunn peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT perezalgortaguillermo peersupporttomaintainpsychologicalwellbeinginpeoplewithadvancedcancerfindingsfromafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |