Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis

Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Yuzhou, Yang, Tinghan, Wu, Qingbin, Yang, Xuyang, Hao, Jianqi, Deng, Xiangbing, Yang, Shuo, Gu, Chaoyang, Wang, Ziqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3276
_version_ 1783572030258413568
author Zhu, Yuzhou
Yang, Tinghan
Wu, Qingbin
Yang, Xuyang
Hao, Jianqi
Deng, Xiangbing
Yang, Shuo
Gu, Chaoyang
Wang, Ziqiang
author_facet Zhu, Yuzhou
Yang, Tinghan
Wu, Qingbin
Yang, Xuyang
Hao, Jianqi
Deng, Xiangbing
Yang, Shuo
Gu, Chaoyang
Wang, Ziqiang
author_sort Zhu, Yuzhou
collection PubMed
description Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty‐one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76‐0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88‐0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79‐0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72‐0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75‐0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95‐0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89‐0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87‐0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7433831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74338312020-08-20 Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis Zhu, Yuzhou Yang, Tinghan Wu, Qingbin Yang, Xuyang Hao, Jianqi Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Shuo Gu, Chaoyang Wang, Ziqiang Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty‐one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76‐0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88‐0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79‐0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72‐0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75‐0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95‐0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89‐0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87‐0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7433831/ /pubmed/32628360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3276 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Zhu, Yuzhou
Yang, Tinghan
Wu, Qingbin
Yang, Xuyang
Hao, Jianqi
Deng, Xiangbing
Yang, Shuo
Gu, Chaoyang
Wang, Ziqiang
Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
title Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_full Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_short Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: a meta‐analysis
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3276
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyuzhou diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT yangtinghan diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT wuqingbin diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT yangxuyang diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT haojianqi diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT dengxiangbing diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT yangshuo diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT guchaoyang diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT wangziqiang diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis