Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis
Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3276 |
_version_ | 1783572030258413568 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Yuzhou Yang, Tinghan Wu, Qingbin Yang, Xuyang Hao, Jianqi Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Shuo Gu, Chaoyang Wang, Ziqiang |
author_facet | Zhu, Yuzhou Yang, Tinghan Wu, Qingbin Yang, Xuyang Hao, Jianqi Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Shuo Gu, Chaoyang Wang, Ziqiang |
author_sort | Zhu, Yuzhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty‐one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76‐0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88‐0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79‐0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72‐0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75‐0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95‐0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89‐0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87‐0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7433831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74338312020-08-20 Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis Zhu, Yuzhou Yang, Tinghan Wu, Qingbin Yang, Xuyang Hao, Jianqi Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Shuo Gu, Chaoyang Wang, Ziqiang Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty‐one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76‐0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88‐0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79‐0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72‐0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75‐0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95‐0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89‐0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87‐0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7433831/ /pubmed/32628360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3276 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Zhu, Yuzhou Yang, Tinghan Wu, Qingbin Yang, Xuyang Hao, Jianqi Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Shuo Gu, Chaoyang Wang, Ziqiang Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title | Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuyuzhou diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT yangtinghan diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT wuqingbin diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT yangxuyang diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT haojianqi diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT dengxiangbing diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT yangshuo diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT guchaoyang diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT wangziqiang diagnosticperformanceofvariousliquidbiopsymethodsindetectingcolorectalcancerametaanalysis |