Cargando…

Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study

OBJECTIVE: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and surgical treatments of SPN and compare the clinical behavior and prognosis between men and women with SPN. METHODS: We collected the population data of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jiali, Mao, Yize, Jiang, Yiquan, Song, Yunda, Yu, Ping, Sun, Shuxin, Li, Shengping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32578384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3180
_version_ 1783572031666651136
author Wu, Jiali
Mao, Yize
Jiang, Yiquan
Song, Yunda
Yu, Ping
Sun, Shuxin
Li, Shengping
author_facet Wu, Jiali
Mao, Yize
Jiang, Yiquan
Song, Yunda
Yu, Ping
Sun, Shuxin
Li, Shengping
author_sort Wu, Jiali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and surgical treatments of SPN and compare the clinical behavior and prognosis between men and women with SPN. METHODS: We collected the population data of patients with SPN diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 from the SEER database. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS), and log‐rank tests were used to evaluate the differences between subgroups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to screen out prognostic risk factors of SPN. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients with SPN were included, with 246 (65.1%) female patients. 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall survival rates were 98.9%, 95.7%, and 93.7%, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that regardless of stage, patients with SPN who underwent surgical interventions still had a significantly better prognosis than those without surgical interventions (P < .001). The patients with lymphatic dissection had a significantly better prognosis than those without lymphatic dissection (P < .001). Moreover, compared with female patients, male patients had significantly poorer OS and DSS (P < .001). Female SPN showed a bimodal age‐frequency distribution with early‐onset incidence at 28 years and late‐onset peak incidence at 62 years, while male SPN presented a unimodal distribution with peak incidence at approximately age 64 years. In female patients, the tumor size in premenopausal females (<65 years old) was significantly larger than that in postmenopausal females (≥65 years old) (P < .001). Clinicopathological characteristic profiles were different not only between male SPN and premenopausal female SPN but also between premenopausal and postmenopausal female SPN. CONCLUSION: SPN presents indolent behavior and predominantly occurs in young women. Regardless of stage, surgical intervention is recommended. Moreover, our study is the first large enough study to demonstrate sex‐related discrepancies in SPN. Thus, different treatment strategies should be designed for patients of different sexes at different ages and hormone therapy is a promising approach for SPN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7433837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74338372020-08-20 Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study Wu, Jiali Mao, Yize Jiang, Yiquan Song, Yunda Yu, Ping Sun, Shuxin Li, Shengping Cancer Med Cancer Prevention OBJECTIVE: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and surgical treatments of SPN and compare the clinical behavior and prognosis between men and women with SPN. METHODS: We collected the population data of patients with SPN diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 from the SEER database. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS), and log‐rank tests were used to evaluate the differences between subgroups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to screen out prognostic risk factors of SPN. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients with SPN were included, with 246 (65.1%) female patients. 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall survival rates were 98.9%, 95.7%, and 93.7%, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that regardless of stage, patients with SPN who underwent surgical interventions still had a significantly better prognosis than those without surgical interventions (P < .001). The patients with lymphatic dissection had a significantly better prognosis than those without lymphatic dissection (P < .001). Moreover, compared with female patients, male patients had significantly poorer OS and DSS (P < .001). Female SPN showed a bimodal age‐frequency distribution with early‐onset incidence at 28 years and late‐onset peak incidence at 62 years, while male SPN presented a unimodal distribution with peak incidence at approximately age 64 years. In female patients, the tumor size in premenopausal females (<65 years old) was significantly larger than that in postmenopausal females (≥65 years old) (P < .001). Clinicopathological characteristic profiles were different not only between male SPN and premenopausal female SPN but also between premenopausal and postmenopausal female SPN. CONCLUSION: SPN presents indolent behavior and predominantly occurs in young women. Regardless of stage, surgical intervention is recommended. Moreover, our study is the first large enough study to demonstrate sex‐related discrepancies in SPN. Thus, different treatment strategies should be designed for patients of different sexes at different ages and hormone therapy is a promising approach for SPN. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7433837/ /pubmed/32578384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3180 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Wu, Jiali
Mao, Yize
Jiang, Yiquan
Song, Yunda
Yu, Ping
Sun, Shuxin
Li, Shengping
Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study
title Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study
title_full Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study
title_fullStr Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study
title_short Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based study
title_sort sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: a population‐based study
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32578384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3180
work_keys_str_mv AT wujiali sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy
AT maoyize sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy
AT jiangyiquan sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy
AT songyunda sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy
AT yuping sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy
AT sunshuxin sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy
AT lishengping sexdifferencesinsolidpseudopapillaryneoplasmofthepancreasapopulationbasedstudy