Cargando…
Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck
BACKGROUND: Microvascular reconstruction of defects in the head and neck has always been a challenge in patients who have undergone previous neck dissection, owing to the prior resection of potential recipient blood vessels used for free flap perfusion. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855923 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_201_19 |
_version_ | 1783572047915384832 |
---|---|
author | Reddy, Thyagraj Jayaram Sham, Ehtaih Ganesh, Mandakulutur S. Menon, P. Suresh Gowda, Karthik Vishwas Malick, Rayan |
author_facet | Reddy, Thyagraj Jayaram Sham, Ehtaih Ganesh, Mandakulutur S. Menon, P. Suresh Gowda, Karthik Vishwas Malick, Rayan |
author_sort | Reddy, Thyagraj Jayaram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microvascular reconstruction of defects in the head and neck has always been a challenge in patients who have undergone previous neck dissection, owing to the prior resection of potential recipient blood vessels used for free flap perfusion. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the reliability and safety of free flap reconstruction in patients who have had previous neck dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four free flaps were performed in 22 patients with a previous history of neck dissection for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. These included patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent cancer as well as patients undergoing secondary reconstruction following previous oncological resections. Flap includes 12 radial forearm free flaps, 5 fibula flaps, 1 rectus abdominis flap, and 6 anterolateral thigh flaps. RESULTS: In cases with the previous history of selective neck dissection, recipient vessels on the ipsilateral/same side of the previously operated neck were used, while contralateral vessels were used in patients with a history of modified radical or radical neck dissection. Vein grafts were not necessary, except for one case. In our series, we did not have any flap loss or considerable increase in operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Free flap reconstruction of head-and-neck defects is highly successful in patients with a history of previous neck dissection, despite a relative scarcity of recipient blood vessels. Careful planning and relying on flaps with a long vascular pedicle obviates the need to perform a suitable vein graft. In our present series, careful planning and the right choice of a free flap with a long vascular pedicle contributes to the absence of free flap failure. In our experience, previous neck dissection should not be considered as a contraindication to microvascular reconstruction of previously operated oncologic defects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7433941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74339412020-08-26 Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck Reddy, Thyagraj Jayaram Sham, Ehtaih Ganesh, Mandakulutur S. Menon, P. Suresh Gowda, Karthik Vishwas Malick, Rayan Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article – Evaluative Study BACKGROUND: Microvascular reconstruction of defects in the head and neck has always been a challenge in patients who have undergone previous neck dissection, owing to the prior resection of potential recipient blood vessels used for free flap perfusion. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the reliability and safety of free flap reconstruction in patients who have had previous neck dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four free flaps were performed in 22 patients with a previous history of neck dissection for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. These included patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent cancer as well as patients undergoing secondary reconstruction following previous oncological resections. Flap includes 12 radial forearm free flaps, 5 fibula flaps, 1 rectus abdominis flap, and 6 anterolateral thigh flaps. RESULTS: In cases with the previous history of selective neck dissection, recipient vessels on the ipsilateral/same side of the previously operated neck were used, while contralateral vessels were used in patients with a history of modified radical or radical neck dissection. Vein grafts were not necessary, except for one case. In our series, we did not have any flap loss or considerable increase in operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Free flap reconstruction of head-and-neck defects is highly successful in patients with a history of previous neck dissection, despite a relative scarcity of recipient blood vessels. Careful planning and relying on flaps with a long vascular pedicle obviates the need to perform a suitable vein graft. In our present series, careful planning and the right choice of a free flap with a long vascular pedicle contributes to the absence of free flap failure. In our experience, previous neck dissection should not be considered as a contraindication to microvascular reconstruction of previously operated oncologic defects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7433941/ /pubmed/32855923 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_201_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Evaluative Study Reddy, Thyagraj Jayaram Sham, Ehtaih Ganesh, Mandakulutur S. Menon, P. Suresh Gowda, Karthik Vishwas Malick, Rayan Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck |
title | Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck |
title_full | Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck |
title_short | Feasibility and Reliability of Microvascular Reconstruction in the Vessel-depleted Previously Operated Neck |
title_sort | feasibility and reliability of microvascular reconstruction in the vessel-depleted previously operated neck |
topic | Original Article – Evaluative Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855923 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_201_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reddythyagrajjayaram feasibilityandreliabilityofmicrovascularreconstructioninthevesseldepletedpreviouslyoperatedneck AT shamehtaih feasibilityandreliabilityofmicrovascularreconstructioninthevesseldepletedpreviouslyoperatedneck AT ganeshmandakuluturs feasibilityandreliabilityofmicrovascularreconstructioninthevesseldepletedpreviouslyoperatedneck AT menonpsuresh feasibilityandreliabilityofmicrovascularreconstructioninthevesseldepletedpreviouslyoperatedneck AT gowdakarthikvishwas feasibilityandreliabilityofmicrovascularreconstructioninthevesseldepletedpreviouslyoperatedneck AT malickrayan feasibilityandreliabilityofmicrovascularreconstructioninthevesseldepletedpreviouslyoperatedneck |