Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery

INTRODUCTION: Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahimov, Chingiz R., Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G., Rahimli, Masuma Ch., Farzaliyev, Ismayil M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855907
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_183_19
_version_ 1783572048389341184
author Rahimov, Chingiz R.
Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G.
Rahimli, Masuma Ch.
Farzaliyev, Ismayil M.
author_facet Rahimov, Chingiz R.
Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G.
Rahimli, Masuma Ch.
Farzaliyev, Ismayil M.
author_sort Rahimov, Chingiz R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our study is to present the surgical outcomes of orbital reconstruction aided by our algorithm of patient-specific virtual planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study was performed on 77 patients with orbital wall fractures who were categorized into two groups: Group A – 42 patients (virtual planning) and Group B – 35 patients (traditional approach). Criteria of analysis included the presence of diplopia postoperatively and duration of surgical procedures. RESULTS: Diplopia was recorded right after surgery in 16 cases (38.1%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. However, 6 months postreconstruction, residual diplopia was recorded in 4 cases (9.5%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. Mean operation time in Group A for the patients with isolated zygoma fracture was 2.23 h; for isolated orbital wall fracture was 1.98 h; and for combined zygoma, orbital wall, and facial bone fracture was 3.07 h. In Group B, these indexes were 3.47, 2.05, and 3.31 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Application of virtual planning could significantly improve postoperative outcomes in orbital reconstruction. However, application of this technology could be limited by complicated defects of the orbital walls, which would require complex shape of the implant that might be difficult to be prevent virtually.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7433943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74339432020-08-26 Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery Rahimov, Chingiz R. Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G. Rahimli, Masuma Ch. Farzaliyev, Ismayil M. Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Comparative Study INTRODUCTION: Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our study is to present the surgical outcomes of orbital reconstruction aided by our algorithm of patient-specific virtual planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study was performed on 77 patients with orbital wall fractures who were categorized into two groups: Group A – 42 patients (virtual planning) and Group B – 35 patients (traditional approach). Criteria of analysis included the presence of diplopia postoperatively and duration of surgical procedures. RESULTS: Diplopia was recorded right after surgery in 16 cases (38.1%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. However, 6 months postreconstruction, residual diplopia was recorded in 4 cases (9.5%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. Mean operation time in Group A for the patients with isolated zygoma fracture was 2.23 h; for isolated orbital wall fracture was 1.98 h; and for combined zygoma, orbital wall, and facial bone fracture was 3.07 h. In Group B, these indexes were 3.47, 2.05, and 3.31 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Application of virtual planning could significantly improve postoperative outcomes in orbital reconstruction. However, application of this technology could be limited by complicated defects of the orbital walls, which would require complex shape of the implant that might be difficult to be prevent virtually. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7433943/ /pubmed/32855907 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_183_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article - Comparative Study
Rahimov, Chingiz R.
Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G.
Rahimli, Masuma Ch.
Farzaliyev, Ismayil M.
Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
title Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
title_full Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
title_short Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
title_sort three-dimensional diagnosis in orbital reconstructive surgery
topic Original Article - Comparative Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855907
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_183_19
work_keys_str_mv AT rahimovchingizr threedimensionaldiagnosisinorbitalreconstructivesurgery
AT ahmadovsirajadding threedimensionaldiagnosisinorbitalreconstructivesurgery
AT rahimlimasumach threedimensionaldiagnosisinorbitalreconstructivesurgery
AT farzaliyevismayilm threedimensionaldiagnosisinorbitalreconstructivesurgery