Cargando…

Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus

BACKGROUND: Implant protrusion into the nasal and maxillary sinuses presents a challenge in cases of severely resorbed maxillae. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effects of BECES(®) implant penetration depth into the nasal and maxillary sinuses. SETTING AND DE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awadalkreem, Fadia, Ahmad, Abdelnasir Gafar, Ihde, Stefan, Osman, Motaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855926
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_42_20
_version_ 1783572052851032064
author Awadalkreem, Fadia
Ahmad, Abdelnasir Gafar
Ihde, Stefan
Osman, Motaz
author_facet Awadalkreem, Fadia
Ahmad, Abdelnasir Gafar
Ihde, Stefan
Osman, Motaz
author_sort Awadalkreem, Fadia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implant protrusion into the nasal and maxillary sinuses presents a challenge in cases of severely resorbed maxillae. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effects of BECES(®) implant penetration depth into the nasal and maxillary sinuses. SETTING AND DESIGN: This was an observational study conducted in a tertiary institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine BECES(®) implants were inserted into the maxilla of patients who presented with severely resorbed ridges but no history of sinusitis. Forty-five implants protruded into the sinus cavities. Patients were examined clinically and radiographically at 1 week and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after insertion. Maxillary sinus health, survival and success rates, and peri-implant health were assessed using the plaque index (PI), calculus index, modified gingival index (MGI), and probing pocket depth (PPD). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann–Whitney test were used in this study. RESULTS: Four (8.16%) of the 45 implants that penetrated the cavities reached the sinus floor without disrupting the membrane; the penetration depth was ≥4 mm in 20 implants (44.44%) and <4 mm in 25 (55.56%). No patient showed clinical or radiographic signs of sinusitis during the observation period. There were significant differences in the PI, MGI, and PPD values between baseline and the 18-month follow-up with no association with the penetration depth. All implants showed radiographically direct bone-to-implant contact. Where the implant tip barely reached the sinus floor, the membrane healed uneventfully while when deeply penetrating the sinus, the membrane healed around the implant but did not cover the tip. All prostheses and implants survived during the observation period. CONCLUSION: Penetration depth of polished implants with cortical engagement into the maxillary sinus or the floor of the nose does not negatively affect implant survival, the success rate of the treatment, nor peri-implant soft-tissue health. It also does not provoke the development of sinusitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7433962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74339622020-08-26 Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus Awadalkreem, Fadia Ahmad, Abdelnasir Gafar Ihde, Stefan Osman, Motaz Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Prospective Study BACKGROUND: Implant protrusion into the nasal and maxillary sinuses presents a challenge in cases of severely resorbed maxillae. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effects of BECES(®) implant penetration depth into the nasal and maxillary sinuses. SETTING AND DESIGN: This was an observational study conducted in a tertiary institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine BECES(®) implants were inserted into the maxilla of patients who presented with severely resorbed ridges but no history of sinusitis. Forty-five implants protruded into the sinus cavities. Patients were examined clinically and radiographically at 1 week and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after insertion. Maxillary sinus health, survival and success rates, and peri-implant health were assessed using the plaque index (PI), calculus index, modified gingival index (MGI), and probing pocket depth (PPD). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann–Whitney test were used in this study. RESULTS: Four (8.16%) of the 45 implants that penetrated the cavities reached the sinus floor without disrupting the membrane; the penetration depth was ≥4 mm in 20 implants (44.44%) and <4 mm in 25 (55.56%). No patient showed clinical or radiographic signs of sinusitis during the observation period. There were significant differences in the PI, MGI, and PPD values between baseline and the 18-month follow-up with no association with the penetration depth. All implants showed radiographically direct bone-to-implant contact. Where the implant tip barely reached the sinus floor, the membrane healed uneventfully while when deeply penetrating the sinus, the membrane healed around the implant but did not cover the tip. All prostheses and implants survived during the observation period. CONCLUSION: Penetration depth of polished implants with cortical engagement into the maxillary sinus or the floor of the nose does not negatively affect implant survival, the success rate of the treatment, nor peri-implant soft-tissue health. It also does not provoke the development of sinusitis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7433962/ /pubmed/32855926 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_42_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article - Prospective Study
Awadalkreem, Fadia
Ahmad, Abdelnasir Gafar
Ihde, Stefan
Osman, Motaz
Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus
title Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus
title_full Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus
title_fullStr Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus
title_short Effects of Corticobasal Implant Protrusion inside the Nasal and Maxillary Sinus
title_sort effects of corticobasal implant protrusion inside the nasal and maxillary sinus
topic Original Article - Prospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855926
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_42_20
work_keys_str_mv AT awadalkreemfadia effectsofcorticobasalimplantprotrusioninsidethenasalandmaxillarysinus
AT ahmadabdelnasirgafar effectsofcorticobasalimplantprotrusioninsidethenasalandmaxillarysinus
AT ihdestefan effectsofcorticobasalimplantprotrusioninsidethenasalandmaxillarysinus
AT osmanmotaz effectsofcorticobasalimplantprotrusioninsidethenasalandmaxillarysinus