Cargando…

Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center

INTRODUCTION: Despite widely appreciated barriers to successful clinical implementation, the literature regarding how to operationalize electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains sparse. We offer a detailed summary of the implementation of PROs into the standard of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatt, Surabhi, Davis, Kristina, Manning, David W., Barnard, Cynthia, Peabody, Terrance D., Rothrock, Nan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970573
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00034
_version_ 1783572065394098176
author Bhatt, Surabhi
Davis, Kristina
Manning, David W.
Barnard, Cynthia
Peabody, Terrance D.
Rothrock, Nan E.
author_facet Bhatt, Surabhi
Davis, Kristina
Manning, David W.
Barnard, Cynthia
Peabody, Terrance D.
Rothrock, Nan E.
author_sort Bhatt, Surabhi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite widely appreciated barriers to successful clinical implementation, the literature regarding how to operationalize electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains sparse. We offer a detailed summary of the implementation of PROs into the standard of care at a major tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Collection of four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests was piloted in a large academic orthopaedic surgery ambulatory clinic starting in October 2016. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests (Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, and Ability to Return to Social Roles and Activities) were initially implemented as manual order sets to be administered before surgery through 2 years after surgery. Completion rate over time, mean time to completion for all PRO domains, and the overall distribution of symptom severity were used to evaluate the success of the pilot. A subsequent optimization and redesign of the pilot was conducted using tablets, automation of questionnaire deployment, and improved results review to address obstacles encountered during the pilot phase. RESULTS: Two thousand nine distinct joint arthroplasty patients (mean age = 65) completed at least one set of PRO assessments, with overall completion rates reaching 68% and mean completion time of 3 minutes. Focal points during the implementation process included engagement and training of staff, selection of an appropriate patient population and outcome measures, and user friendly data displays for patients and providers. CONCLUSION: Our pilot program successfully demonstrated that PROs can be administered, scored, and made immediately available within the electronic health record to patients and their providers with minimal disruption of clinical workflows. Although considerable operational and technological challenges remain, we found that the implementation of PROs in clinical care within an ambulatory practice at an academic medical center can be achieved through a constellation of several key factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7434040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74340402020-09-02 Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center Bhatt, Surabhi Davis, Kristina Manning, David W. Barnard, Cynthia Peabody, Terrance D. Rothrock, Nan E. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article INTRODUCTION: Despite widely appreciated barriers to successful clinical implementation, the literature regarding how to operationalize electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains sparse. We offer a detailed summary of the implementation of PROs into the standard of care at a major tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Collection of four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests was piloted in a large academic orthopaedic surgery ambulatory clinic starting in October 2016. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests (Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, and Ability to Return to Social Roles and Activities) were initially implemented as manual order sets to be administered before surgery through 2 years after surgery. Completion rate over time, mean time to completion for all PRO domains, and the overall distribution of symptom severity were used to evaluate the success of the pilot. A subsequent optimization and redesign of the pilot was conducted using tablets, automation of questionnaire deployment, and improved results review to address obstacles encountered during the pilot phase. RESULTS: Two thousand nine distinct joint arthroplasty patients (mean age = 65) completed at least one set of PRO assessments, with overall completion rates reaching 68% and mean completion time of 3 minutes. Focal points during the implementation process included engagement and training of staff, selection of an appropriate patient population and outcome measures, and user friendly data displays for patients and providers. CONCLUSION: Our pilot program successfully demonstrated that PROs can be administered, scored, and made immediately available within the electronic health record to patients and their providers with minimal disruption of clinical workflows. Although considerable operational and technological challenges remain, we found that the implementation of PROs in clinical care within an ambulatory practice at an academic medical center can be achieved through a constellation of several key factors. Wolters Kluwer 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7434040/ /pubmed/33970573 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00034 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bhatt, Surabhi
Davis, Kristina
Manning, David W.
Barnard, Cynthia
Peabody, Terrance D.
Rothrock, Nan E.
Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center
title Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center
title_full Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center
title_fullStr Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center
title_short Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center
title_sort integration of patient-reported outcomes in a total joint arthroplasty program at a high-volume academic medical center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970573
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00034
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattsurabhi integrationofpatientreportedoutcomesinatotaljointarthroplastyprogramatahighvolumeacademicmedicalcenter
AT daviskristina integrationofpatientreportedoutcomesinatotaljointarthroplastyprogramatahighvolumeacademicmedicalcenter
AT manningdavidw integrationofpatientreportedoutcomesinatotaljointarthroplastyprogramatahighvolumeacademicmedicalcenter
AT barnardcynthia integrationofpatientreportedoutcomesinatotaljointarthroplastyprogramatahighvolumeacademicmedicalcenter
AT peabodyterranced integrationofpatientreportedoutcomesinatotaljointarthroplastyprogramatahighvolumeacademicmedicalcenter
AT rothrocknane integrationofpatientreportedoutcomesinatotaljointarthroplastyprogramatahighvolumeacademicmedicalcenter