Cargando…

Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches

AIMS: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform developme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gedeon, Charlotte, Sandell, Mikael, Birkemose, Inge, Kakko, Johan, Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður, Simojoki, Kaarlo, Clausen, Thomas, Nyberg, Fred, Littlewood, Richard, Alho, Hannu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072518815322
_version_ 1783572086893051904
author Gedeon, Charlotte
Sandell, Mikael
Birkemose, Inge
Kakko, Johan
Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður
Simojoki, Kaarlo
Clausen, Thomas
Nyberg, Fred
Littlewood, Richard
Alho, Hannu
author_facet Gedeon, Charlotte
Sandell, Mikael
Birkemose, Inge
Kakko, Johan
Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður
Simojoki, Kaarlo
Clausen, Thomas
Nyberg, Fred
Littlewood, Richard
Alho, Hannu
author_sort Gedeon, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform development of a common standard. METHOD: Evidence of population sizes and treatment approach collected. Common standards for care (harm reduction, pharmacotherapy, psychology/social therapy) defined for each country. RESULTS: Evidence defines number in treatment; potential population needing treatment not defined for all countries. Populations sizes, treatment access (ratio in treatment programme compared to total country population) defined: Sweden 4,000 in OUD care (access ratio 40); Finland 3,000 (55); Norway 8,000 (154); Denmark 7,500 (132). Approach to treatment similar: integrated treatment programmes standard. Care provided by specialists in outpatient clinics/primary care; secondary care/inpatient services are available. Harm reduction is limited in Sweden but available and more accessible elsewhere. Treatment entry criteria: access relatively unlimited in Norway and Denmark, more limited in Finland and Sweden. Standards of care defined: easy access to high-quality services, individual planning, care not limited by time, management of relapse, education for patients, continuous engagement, holistic approach including management of comorbidities, needle equipment programmes without limit, treatment in prisons as community. CONCLUSION: There are opportunities to improve OUD care in the Nordics. Policy makers and clinicians can advance OUD care and share common success factors. Collaborative work across the Nordic countries is valuable. Further research in clinical practice development can yield important results for the benefit of patients with OUD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7434162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74341622020-09-14 Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches Gedeon, Charlotte Sandell, Mikael Birkemose, Inge Kakko, Johan Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður Simojoki, Kaarlo Clausen, Thomas Nyberg, Fred Littlewood, Richard Alho, Hannu Nordisk Alkohol Nark Overview AIMS: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform development of a common standard. METHOD: Evidence of population sizes and treatment approach collected. Common standards for care (harm reduction, pharmacotherapy, psychology/social therapy) defined for each country. RESULTS: Evidence defines number in treatment; potential population needing treatment not defined for all countries. Populations sizes, treatment access (ratio in treatment programme compared to total country population) defined: Sweden 4,000 in OUD care (access ratio 40); Finland 3,000 (55); Norway 8,000 (154); Denmark 7,500 (132). Approach to treatment similar: integrated treatment programmes standard. Care provided by specialists in outpatient clinics/primary care; secondary care/inpatient services are available. Harm reduction is limited in Sweden but available and more accessible elsewhere. Treatment entry criteria: access relatively unlimited in Norway and Denmark, more limited in Finland and Sweden. Standards of care defined: easy access to high-quality services, individual planning, care not limited by time, management of relapse, education for patients, continuous engagement, holistic approach including management of comorbidities, needle equipment programmes without limit, treatment in prisons as community. CONCLUSION: There are opportunities to improve OUD care in the Nordics. Policy makers and clinicians can advance OUD care and share common success factors. Collaborative work across the Nordic countries is valuable. Further research in clinical practice development can yield important results for the benefit of patients with OUD. SAGE Publications 2019-01-27 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7434162/ /pubmed/32934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072518815322 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Overview
Gedeon, Charlotte
Sandell, Mikael
Birkemose, Inge
Kakko, Johan
Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður
Simojoki, Kaarlo
Clausen, Thomas
Nyberg, Fred
Littlewood, Richard
Alho, Hannu
Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
title Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
title_full Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
title_fullStr Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
title_full_unstemmed Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
title_short Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
title_sort standards for opioid use disorder care: an assessment of nordic approaches
topic Overview
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072518815322
work_keys_str_mv AT gedeoncharlotte standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT sandellmikael standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT birkemoseinge standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT kakkojohan standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT runarsdottirvalgerður standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT simojokikaarlo standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT clausenthomas standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT nybergfred standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT littlewoodrichard standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches
AT alhohannu standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches