Cargando…
Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches
AIMS: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform developme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072518815322 |
_version_ | 1783572086893051904 |
---|---|
author | Gedeon, Charlotte Sandell, Mikael Birkemose, Inge Kakko, Johan Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður Simojoki, Kaarlo Clausen, Thomas Nyberg, Fred Littlewood, Richard Alho, Hannu |
author_facet | Gedeon, Charlotte Sandell, Mikael Birkemose, Inge Kakko, Johan Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður Simojoki, Kaarlo Clausen, Thomas Nyberg, Fred Littlewood, Richard Alho, Hannu |
author_sort | Gedeon, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform development of a common standard. METHOD: Evidence of population sizes and treatment approach collected. Common standards for care (harm reduction, pharmacotherapy, psychology/social therapy) defined for each country. RESULTS: Evidence defines number in treatment; potential population needing treatment not defined for all countries. Populations sizes, treatment access (ratio in treatment programme compared to total country population) defined: Sweden 4,000 in OUD care (access ratio 40); Finland 3,000 (55); Norway 8,000 (154); Denmark 7,500 (132). Approach to treatment similar: integrated treatment programmes standard. Care provided by specialists in outpatient clinics/primary care; secondary care/inpatient services are available. Harm reduction is limited in Sweden but available and more accessible elsewhere. Treatment entry criteria: access relatively unlimited in Norway and Denmark, more limited in Finland and Sweden. Standards of care defined: easy access to high-quality services, individual planning, care not limited by time, management of relapse, education for patients, continuous engagement, holistic approach including management of comorbidities, needle equipment programmes without limit, treatment in prisons as community. CONCLUSION: There are opportunities to improve OUD care in the Nordics. Policy makers and clinicians can advance OUD care and share common success factors. Collaborative work across the Nordic countries is valuable. Further research in clinical practice development can yield important results for the benefit of patients with OUD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7434162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74341622020-09-14 Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches Gedeon, Charlotte Sandell, Mikael Birkemose, Inge Kakko, Johan Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður Simojoki, Kaarlo Clausen, Thomas Nyberg, Fred Littlewood, Richard Alho, Hannu Nordisk Alkohol Nark Overview AIMS: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform development of a common standard. METHOD: Evidence of population sizes and treatment approach collected. Common standards for care (harm reduction, pharmacotherapy, psychology/social therapy) defined for each country. RESULTS: Evidence defines number in treatment; potential population needing treatment not defined for all countries. Populations sizes, treatment access (ratio in treatment programme compared to total country population) defined: Sweden 4,000 in OUD care (access ratio 40); Finland 3,000 (55); Norway 8,000 (154); Denmark 7,500 (132). Approach to treatment similar: integrated treatment programmes standard. Care provided by specialists in outpatient clinics/primary care; secondary care/inpatient services are available. Harm reduction is limited in Sweden but available and more accessible elsewhere. Treatment entry criteria: access relatively unlimited in Norway and Denmark, more limited in Finland and Sweden. Standards of care defined: easy access to high-quality services, individual planning, care not limited by time, management of relapse, education for patients, continuous engagement, holistic approach including management of comorbidities, needle equipment programmes without limit, treatment in prisons as community. CONCLUSION: There are opportunities to improve OUD care in the Nordics. Policy makers and clinicians can advance OUD care and share common success factors. Collaborative work across the Nordic countries is valuable. Further research in clinical practice development can yield important results for the benefit of patients with OUD. SAGE Publications 2019-01-27 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7434162/ /pubmed/32934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072518815322 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Overview Gedeon, Charlotte Sandell, Mikael Birkemose, Inge Kakko, Johan Rúnarsdóttir, Valgerður Simojoki, Kaarlo Clausen, Thomas Nyberg, Fred Littlewood, Richard Alho, Hannu Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches |
title | Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic
approaches |
title_full | Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic
approaches |
title_fullStr | Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic
approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic
approaches |
title_short | Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic
approaches |
title_sort | standards for opioid use disorder care: an assessment of nordic
approaches |
topic | Overview |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1455072518815322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gedeoncharlotte standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT sandellmikael standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT birkemoseinge standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT kakkojohan standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT runarsdottirvalgerður standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT simojokikaarlo standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT clausenthomas standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT nybergfred standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT littlewoodrichard standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches AT alhohannu standardsforopioidusedisordercareanassessmentofnordicapproaches |