Cargando…

Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients

OBJECTIVE: Nebulised dexmedetomidine can be an easy alternative for preoperative sedation in paediatric patients, but data regarding its efficacy are very limited. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, double-blind study included 66 patients aged between 1 and 8 years. Patients were divided into tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anupriya, Jindal, Kurhekar, Pranjali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864647
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.78889
_version_ 1783572127621840896
author Anupriya, Jindal
Kurhekar, Pranjali
author_facet Anupriya, Jindal
Kurhekar, Pranjali
author_sort Anupriya, Jindal
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Nebulised dexmedetomidine can be an easy alternative for preoperative sedation in paediatric patients, but data regarding its efficacy are very limited. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, double-blind study included 66 patients aged between 1 and 8 years. Patients were divided into two groups as D2 and D3. The D2 group received 2 μg kg(−1) of nebulised dexmedetomidine, and the D3 group received 3 μg kg(−1) of nebulised dexmedetomidine preoperatively. All the patients received general anaesthesia and caudal epidural analgesia with 0.75 mL kg(−1) of 0.2% ropivacaine. Parental Separation Anxiety Scale at 30 min after the end of nebulisation, Mask Acceptance Score (MAS) during induction, haemodynamic variables, emergence agitation and duration of caudal analgesia were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was done using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULTS: All the parameters were comparable between the D2 and D3 groups; however, significantly more number of younger children was observed in the D3 group. Hence, further analysis was done after division into the lower age (1–3 years) and higher age (4–8 years) groups. In lower age group children, satisfactory parental separation was achieved in 100% of the patients in the D3 group compared to 20% of those in the D2 group (p=0.00). MAS was significantly better in the D3 group in both the lower (p=0.019) and higher (p=0.036) age groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that nebulised dexmedetomidine in a dose of 3 μg kg(−1) provides better parental separation and mask acceptance in younger children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7434347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74343472020-08-28 Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients Anupriya, Jindal Kurhekar, Pranjali Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: Nebulised dexmedetomidine can be an easy alternative for preoperative sedation in paediatric patients, but data regarding its efficacy are very limited. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, double-blind study included 66 patients aged between 1 and 8 years. Patients were divided into two groups as D2 and D3. The D2 group received 2 μg kg(−1) of nebulised dexmedetomidine, and the D3 group received 3 μg kg(−1) of nebulised dexmedetomidine preoperatively. All the patients received general anaesthesia and caudal epidural analgesia with 0.75 mL kg(−1) of 0.2% ropivacaine. Parental Separation Anxiety Scale at 30 min after the end of nebulisation, Mask Acceptance Score (MAS) during induction, haemodynamic variables, emergence agitation and duration of caudal analgesia were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was done using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULTS: All the parameters were comparable between the D2 and D3 groups; however, significantly more number of younger children was observed in the D3 group. Hence, further analysis was done after division into the lower age (1–3 years) and higher age (4–8 years) groups. In lower age group children, satisfactory parental separation was achieved in 100% of the patients in the D3 group compared to 20% of those in the D2 group (p=0.00). MAS was significantly better in the D3 group in both the lower (p=0.019) and higher (p=0.036) age groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that nebulised dexmedetomidine in a dose of 3 μg kg(−1) provides better parental separation and mask acceptance in younger children. Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020-08 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7434347/ /pubmed/32864647 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.78889 Text en © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Article
Anupriya, Jindal
Kurhekar, Pranjali
Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients
title Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients
title_full Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients
title_fullStr Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients
title_full_unstemmed Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients
title_short Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients
title_sort randomised comparison between the efficacy of two doses of nebulised dexmedetomidine for premedication in paediatric patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864647
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.78889
work_keys_str_mv AT anupriyajindal randomisedcomparisonbetweentheefficacyoftwodosesofnebuliseddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpaediatricpatients
AT kurhekarpranjali randomisedcomparisonbetweentheefficacyoftwodosesofnebuliseddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpaediatricpatients